Recommended Posts

Ok... I got your point.. :)

If virtual machine has no network for access to your host,your host won't get affect by any virus in your guest operating system. :)

What? You're thinking of trojans, viruses don't need internet/network connections to operate.

His point was that if the guest can not access host via network, then its not possible to jump from guest to host. Which is true - guest unless setup has no access to host file system, so if no network access it should not be possible for infection to jump from guest to host.

Unless person with access to host filesystem exe something off guest file system.

His point was that if the guest can not access host via network, then its not possible to jump from guest to host. Which is true - guest unless setup has no access to host file system, so if no network access it should not be possible for infection to jump from guest to host.

Unless person with access to host filesystem exe something off guest file system.

No it's not true, viruses can exploit sandbox/VM things which is why recently as I said on the other page that hyperV, virtualbox, and all the other large-scale VM solutions with the exception of VMware had an exploit leaked that will pass from the guest to the host no problem. You've also got bugs in CPUs that can allow exploits too.

And that is a RARE specific exploit - I run vmware esxi, I have not heard of any guest to host exploits?

Could you link to these exploits from guest to host?

And along with I normally run antivirus on my windows guests. And when I use that to access questionable locations or files, I have a snapshot taken before and after done just rollback to before.

I agree no system is going to be 100% fullproof - but the odds of moving from guest to host has got to be rare. My point was that if the vm has network access or shared access to the host filesystem, then sure it would be easy for something to jump to another box on the network if a worm and other boxes are open to it, and or if guest has write access to host filesystem it could infect/encrypt/delete/etc files on the host filesystem.

Ok - 2nd one is dos attack, not a guest-host escape

"This is a denial of service vulnerability. An attacker who exploited this vulnerability could cause the affected Hyper-V server to stop responding, requiring a restart. Note that the denial of service vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate their user rights on the Hyper-V server, but it could cause the affected system to stop accepting requests."

3rd one again is talking about dos, not escape.

Again not saying they don't exist - there was Cloudburst back in 2009. But do you know of any active guest-host escapes in the wild? Other than whitepapers discussing the possibility?

Are you aware of any malware/extortionware/virus that uses such complicated exploits?

Again I will agree that nothing is 100% secure, and yes there always going to be security issues that need to be addressed. But it comes down to is the exploit in the wild? Is it something that you surfing the underbelly of the net, or driveby or even running some keygen or hacked game or application is going to be infecting your machine and jumping to your host?

I would be more concerned with running bad code (worm) that then could then seek out your other vms or physical or even host machine via network than a guest-host escape.

Generally speaking, not talking a targeted attack against your infrastructure - some paid hacker getting into a company through a vm that is exposed to the public net, etc. Just generally speaking its unlikely to have to be worried about a guest-host escape no matter what your running be it virtualbox, vmware workstation (type2) or something like esxi/xen/kvm (type1).

Should you be aware that such things can exist - sure! If your tinfoil hat is a bit tight, maybe you don't run the vm tools on your vm - this is generally going to be the attack vector currently. Must of the stuff I have seen has been against intel, so run amd cpus on your host ;)

But common sense would tell you not to allow your VMs to have rw to your host filesystem via vm sharing tools or setup, etc. And if your playing with bad code - you might want to isolate their network connectivity to the rest of your vms/host/local network.

I don't know of any publically available viruses that utilise it no, but the reason for that is because the people that know about these security flaws will be governments and incredibly sophisticated hackers, they won't be telling OEMs about them nor releasing POCs about them either but will use them discreetly in the shadows without anyone knowing.

"about these security flaws will be governments and incredibly sophisticated hackers"

So you think a virus scanner you got from mcafee or nod or whatever is going to protect against a government backed attack?

So as I was saying, generally speaking guest-host escapes is not something the general user base - say running some vms on my home lab box for example needs to be worried about protecting against. Other than making sure your VM software be it type1 or 2 is updated, and host os are patched and securely configured.

And in this context you could be pretty sure that this form of exploit is not going to be used when you download that keygen or hacked exe of some game or application or surf the dark underbelly of the net. What you should be concerned with is more that you can roll the vm back after you play with something like that. Or that the box does not become infected with the lastest worm that could infect your other vms/local network.

I think we are the same page yes?

Hello,

There was a discussion not too long ago of the Windows version of OSX/Crisis infecting virtual machines, and I though the Koobface malware contained an exploit for VMware that allowed it to escape from the guest OS to the host OS, but I cannot seem to find an exact reference to it. I think this would have been around 2009-2010, though.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

The recent one was fine if you use vmware, it was not vulnerable.

Here's some links to things about the bugs;

http://www.aidanfinn.com/?p=12837

http://technet.micro...lletin/ms11-047

http://blog.coresecu...ploit-ms10-102/

Hello,

I am unsure of why McAfee or ESET of any of the other anti-malware programs would not protect you. They detect various pieces of malware such as ACAD/Medre, OSX/Lamadai, Win32/Duqu, Win32/Flamer, Win32/Georbot, Win32/R2D2 and Win32/Stuxnet which are generally acknowledged to be created (or tacitly approved by) various nation-states around the globe.

While it seems ludicrous that an anti-malware company might be fettered by the intelligence apparatus of the country in which it is headquartered, even if you were not to rule that out of hand, there are anti-malware companies located in countries around the world that are mutually antagonistic towards each other, and I could see a Chinese or a Russian anti-malware company treating malware created by an American or European government as a PR goldmine. The truth of the matter, though, is that governments are going to be pretty unlikely to inform anti-malware companies of malware they have developed or are using, since that violates the whole point of using malware in the first place: Plausible deniability.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

"about these security flaws will be governments and incredibly sophisticated hackers"

So you think a virus scanner you got from mcafee or nod or whatever is going to protect against a government backed attack?

So as I was saying, generally speaking guest-host escapes is not something the general user base - say running some vms on my home lab box for example needs to be worried about protecting against. Other than making sure your VM software be it type1 or 2 is updated, and host os are patched and securely configured.

And in this context you could be pretty sure that this form of exploit is not going to be used when you download that keygen or hacked exe of some game or application or surf the dark underbelly of the net. What you should be concerned with is more that you can roll the vm back after you play with something like that. Or that the box does not become infected with the lastest worm that could infect your other vms/local network.

I think we are the same page yes?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • 47% profit margin? Wtf!! I know companies are in business to make money but come on man. I know for a fact I'll never own one of these.
    • Most AI-powered mainframe migration vendors expected to fail by 2030, Gartner warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels You may have read that many companies still run code written in ancient programming languages like COBOL and pay a handsome sum for those who can maintain that code. Well, it looks like this area of the tech world could be the scene of an AI bubble. It turns out that there are mainframe exit vendors, helping companies move their legacy mainframe systems to modern cloud environments or servers such as Microsoft Azure and AWS, using generative AI tooling. Unfortunately, 75% of these vendors are now expected to pivot or cease operations as market realities take hold by 2030. Alessandro Galimberti from Gartner said: Some of the companies in the mainframe exit market are IBM, 21CS, BMC, Broadcom, Rocket Software, DXC, GTSG, and Kyndryl. The reasons some of these firms are expected to quit the market are a reset of market expectations and a decline in demand for one-size-fits-all migration solutions. The reset in expectations is likely to be driven by cost overruns and threats to business, and the potential occurrence of critical failures within businesses as a result of bad transition implementations. These insights from Gartner are pretty interesting because it’s a specific area of the market where doubt is being cast on generative AI. Many people have cast doubt on whether AI companies will successfully justify the massive amounts spent on GenAI to date, and this data from Gartner suggests the road could be rocky for GenAI.
    • Heaven forbid they lose pennies from their Trillions! Like always, the consumer pays the most. Why is Tim Cooks even talking.....shouldn't he be packing up his office??
    • If you have the budget...! Some solo or indies just want to either learn or start their game and aren't in a capacity to pay salaries or to contractors... Get real.
    • Source and more 35 years old?! And if my maths is mathing, that means she was around 10 when The Ring came out?! Damn...scariest 10 year old I think I've ever seen. 
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      537
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      neufuse
      64
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!