Recommended Posts

Ok... I got your point.. :)

If virtual machine has no network for access to your host,your host won't get affect by any virus in your guest operating system. :)

What? You're thinking of trojans, viruses don't need internet/network connections to operate.

His point was that if the guest can not access host via network, then its not possible to jump from guest to host. Which is true - guest unless setup has no access to host file system, so if no network access it should not be possible for infection to jump from guest to host.

Unless person with access to host filesystem exe something off guest file system.

His point was that if the guest can not access host via network, then its not possible to jump from guest to host. Which is true - guest unless setup has no access to host file system, so if no network access it should not be possible for infection to jump from guest to host.

Unless person with access to host filesystem exe something off guest file system.

No it's not true, viruses can exploit sandbox/VM things which is why recently as I said on the other page that hyperV, virtualbox, and all the other large-scale VM solutions with the exception of VMware had an exploit leaked that will pass from the guest to the host no problem. You've also got bugs in CPUs that can allow exploits too.

And that is a RARE specific exploit - I run vmware esxi, I have not heard of any guest to host exploits?

Could you link to these exploits from guest to host?

And along with I normally run antivirus on my windows guests. And when I use that to access questionable locations or files, I have a snapshot taken before and after done just rollback to before.

I agree no system is going to be 100% fullproof - but the odds of moving from guest to host has got to be rare. My point was that if the vm has network access or shared access to the host filesystem, then sure it would be easy for something to jump to another box on the network if a worm and other boxes are open to it, and or if guest has write access to host filesystem it could infect/encrypt/delete/etc files on the host filesystem.

Ok - 2nd one is dos attack, not a guest-host escape

"This is a denial of service vulnerability. An attacker who exploited this vulnerability could cause the affected Hyper-V server to stop responding, requiring a restart. Note that the denial of service vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate their user rights on the Hyper-V server, but it could cause the affected system to stop accepting requests."

3rd one again is talking about dos, not escape.

Again not saying they don't exist - there was Cloudburst back in 2009. But do you know of any active guest-host escapes in the wild? Other than whitepapers discussing the possibility?

Are you aware of any malware/extortionware/virus that uses such complicated exploits?

Again I will agree that nothing is 100% secure, and yes there always going to be security issues that need to be addressed. But it comes down to is the exploit in the wild? Is it something that you surfing the underbelly of the net, or driveby or even running some keygen or hacked game or application is going to be infecting your machine and jumping to your host?

I would be more concerned with running bad code (worm) that then could then seek out your other vms or physical or even host machine via network than a guest-host escape.

Generally speaking, not talking a targeted attack against your infrastructure - some paid hacker getting into a company through a vm that is exposed to the public net, etc. Just generally speaking its unlikely to have to be worried about a guest-host escape no matter what your running be it virtualbox, vmware workstation (type2) or something like esxi/xen/kvm (type1).

Should you be aware that such things can exist - sure! If your tinfoil hat is a bit tight, maybe you don't run the vm tools on your vm - this is generally going to be the attack vector currently. Must of the stuff I have seen has been against intel, so run amd cpus on your host ;)

But common sense would tell you not to allow your VMs to have rw to your host filesystem via vm sharing tools or setup, etc. And if your playing with bad code - you might want to isolate their network connectivity to the rest of your vms/host/local network.

I don't know of any publically available viruses that utilise it no, but the reason for that is because the people that know about these security flaws will be governments and incredibly sophisticated hackers, they won't be telling OEMs about them nor releasing POCs about them either but will use them discreetly in the shadows without anyone knowing.

"about these security flaws will be governments and incredibly sophisticated hackers"

So you think a virus scanner you got from mcafee or nod or whatever is going to protect against a government backed attack?

So as I was saying, generally speaking guest-host escapes is not something the general user base - say running some vms on my home lab box for example needs to be worried about protecting against. Other than making sure your VM software be it type1 or 2 is updated, and host os are patched and securely configured.

And in this context you could be pretty sure that this form of exploit is not going to be used when you download that keygen or hacked exe of some game or application or surf the dark underbelly of the net. What you should be concerned with is more that you can roll the vm back after you play with something like that. Or that the box does not become infected with the lastest worm that could infect your other vms/local network.

I think we are the same page yes?

Hello,

There was a discussion not too long ago of the Windows version of OSX/Crisis infecting virtual machines, and I though the Koobface malware contained an exploit for VMware that allowed it to escape from the guest OS to the host OS, but I cannot seem to find an exact reference to it. I think this would have been around 2009-2010, though.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

The recent one was fine if you use vmware, it was not vulnerable.

Here's some links to things about the bugs;

http://www.aidanfinn.com/?p=12837

http://technet.micro...lletin/ms11-047

http://blog.coresecu...ploit-ms10-102/

Hello,

I am unsure of why McAfee or ESET of any of the other anti-malware programs would not protect you. They detect various pieces of malware such as ACAD/Medre, OSX/Lamadai, Win32/Duqu, Win32/Flamer, Win32/Georbot, Win32/R2D2 and Win32/Stuxnet which are generally acknowledged to be created (or tacitly approved by) various nation-states around the globe.

While it seems ludicrous that an anti-malware company might be fettered by the intelligence apparatus of the country in which it is headquartered, even if you were not to rule that out of hand, there are anti-malware companies located in countries around the world that are mutually antagonistic towards each other, and I could see a Chinese or a Russian anti-malware company treating malware created by an American or European government as a PR goldmine. The truth of the matter, though, is that governments are going to be pretty unlikely to inform anti-malware companies of malware they have developed or are using, since that violates the whole point of using malware in the first place: Plausible deniability.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

"about these security flaws will be governments and incredibly sophisticated hackers"

So you think a virus scanner you got from mcafee or nod or whatever is going to protect against a government backed attack?

So as I was saying, generally speaking guest-host escapes is not something the general user base - say running some vms on my home lab box for example needs to be worried about protecting against. Other than making sure your VM software be it type1 or 2 is updated, and host os are patched and securely configured.

And in this context you could be pretty sure that this form of exploit is not going to be used when you download that keygen or hacked exe of some game or application or surf the dark underbelly of the net. What you should be concerned with is more that you can roll the vm back after you play with something like that. Or that the box does not become infected with the lastest worm that could infect your other vms/local network.

I think we are the same page yes?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!