Recommended Posts

Hello! This post will be long but I need some help.

I have recently run into an interesting dilemma and need some advice. I'm in college and live in a large house with a lot of other people. I have my own internet connection in my room, and up to now everyone in the house used another kids internet connection. He recently disabled his internet because nobody was paying him even though they used his connection. SO a few people came to me asking if they could use mine for a few days, and being the nonconfrontational person that I am, I gave them the info.

Well now everyone in the house is using it, and I have 15 separate devices connected to my wireless router. Now I could just change the password, but it would no doubt be an endless cycle, and as I said I hate confrontation. So I really want to set up a custom router so that I can control what is going on.

I'm considering two options, either buying an older used computer(<100$) and turning it into a software router, or putting custom firmware on a router. I was hoping you guys could help me figure out which would be better for me, because I can't decide.

I have to be able to limit bandwidth to users, because I payed for a separate connection in the first place so that I could have quick internet all to myself. I have a few roommates that I know torrent illegally like crazy, and I don't want to deal with that, so I want to be able to block that and be able to set up a terms of use agreement splash page. I would really really like to be able to set up a pay to use thing, so I don't even allow them to connect unless I've gotten money for the month (to completely avoid what happened to the other kid).

I've read some articles about both methods, and I still can't decide. I'm a computer science major and just the thought of setting up a linux box and learning all of the network stuff and implementing it myself gets me excited, but I am kind of pressed for time too. I also wouldn't mind having a file/media server.

Any thoughts, suggestions, ideas? I just don't know where to start.

Anything that can run tomato firmware, or a router that has a guest network feature.

With tomatoUSB from shabby or toastman you can set up a bandwidth limit within the QoS menu on the same ranges your DHCP scope. You then set all your own devices to static up in dhcp on the router(not on the devices).

Or if you use a router with a guest network feature, I believe you can set up BW limits on the guest network, us I'm not sure. Of course with tomato you could also set up a feature where they would have to pay to your Paypal account for noter net access, which seems the fair option ;)

  • Like 1

WPA Enterprise will let you give each user a different username and key but needs an external computer with a radius installed, You might want to look at the Cisco (not Linksys) 87x series which are going cheap online these days.

Anyone with any experience with a software router solution rather than a hardware solution? What advantages/disadvantages does running an older computer as a router have over running customer firmware on a hardware router? (Other than more power consumption)

Build a pfsense box and get an amped wireless!!!

For the wireless stuff

Pfsense is really powerful enterprise grade router software you install on a pc.

you tune their bandwidth down with the right router and let it go. its been a long time for me since school but i recall seeing some real payback when you take something away. if that orange juice taste funny you will know why.....just saying something to think about.

If you have the time and wanting to learn something good go with pfSense (look at their website, you'll find good stuff there) but if you don't have time go with the already suggested Tomato firmware or ww-drt on an old router (read the specs of the firmware because they don't support all routers and hardwares) it's easy to set up and you'll like how it looks too. ;)

pfSense:

www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&Itemid=43

Tomato:

www.polarcloud.com

ww-drt:

www.dd-wrt.com/site/index

Good luck and please post if ya need further help.

Nabz0r, I think you got that backwards.. It's not WW-DRT. Even your link says DD-WRT, lol. :p

I used ptSense in the past. Awesome software.

(OT: CJ33, I miss Vivi :( )

Your going to have to learn how to deal with confrontation if you plan on coexisting in the real world.

Change the password - and be done with it. When they ask you to use it again for "a couple" of days. That has already passed, and it seems you like to share since now there are 15 people using it, etc.

Going forward.

If you go with say pfsense on your own hardware - you could setup a captive portal that allow for vouchers (version 2.x of pfsense). And you could limit the bandwidth as well. You could create vouchers that are good for say different periods of time be it 1 hour, be it 24, 7 days, month, etc.. Then as they give you money you give them the voucher number that matches up with that amount of time. Once they put in the voucher number - clock starts ticking. Once time is up they loose access and would have to pay for new voucher number.

http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Captive_Portal_Vouchers

  On 05/11/2012 at 15:56, Mindovermaster said:

Nabz0r, I think you got that backwards.. It's not WW-DRT. Even your link says DD-WRT, lol. :p

LOL! It was 6 in the morning and I was on the train on my way to work and I am glad that this was the only mistake I made. :p

Back to topic:

How did it go? Any updates?

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

I have a similar situation and I throttle devices with abandon. I use the stock software on a newish Linksys router. The stock firmware will do what you want it to, but its really your call on that. Getting it all setup is the time consuming part, obviously, but it can be done. My router now features a parental control feature. You can time allow/disallow devices-I LOVE THIS.

I also agree with the bit about charging people for using your bandwidth. Fair is fair.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD thinks Ryzen Threadripper 9000 wipes the floor with Intel by Sayan Sen At Computex 2025 earlier this year, AMD revealed its new Zen 5-based Ryzen Threadripper 9000 series with up to 96 cores, comprising the PRO 9000WX series and 9000 series chips. At the time though the company did not share performance numbers but given the specs, we had a fairly good idea of their capability. For those who may not be familiar with Ryzen Threadripper, it is AMD's desktop CPU lineup meant for workstations and HEDT (high-end desktop) builds and is placed between the mainstream Ryzen and the server EPYC lineups. With the launch expected to happen next month, performance numbers for the Ryzen Threadripper 9000 are now out. Before diving into the performance details, AMD has also shared a recap of some of the platform details and the compatible sTR5 socket. These new premium chips support up to 8 channels of DDR5-6400 memory and up to 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes for I/O. AMD also promises over 7000 MT/s of DDR5 support with EXPO. The specs of the Ryzen Threadripper 9000 lineup are given below: Processor SKU Cores Threads Base Clock (GHz) Boost Clock (GHz) L3 Cache (MB) Memory Channels PCIe Lanes TDP (W) AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX 96 192 2.5 5.45 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX 64 128 3.2 5.4 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX 32 64 3.2 5.4 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24 48 3.2 5.4 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX 16 32 3.2 5.4 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX 12 24 3.2 5.4 384 8‑channel DDR5‑6400 ECC 128 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X 64 128 3.2 5.4 256 4‑channel DDR5‑6400 92 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9970X 32 64 3.2 5.4 256 4‑channel DDR5‑6400 92 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X 24 48 3.2 5.4 256 4‑channel DDR5‑6400 92 PCIe Gen5 350 AMD has compared the 96-core 9995WX against the previous-gen 7995WX (images below), also with the same core configuration, and the 64-core 9980X, against Intel's 60-core Xeon W9-3595X. While Xeon has generally been associated with Server CPUs, the Xeon W chips are designed to be used in workstations. AMD follows a similar naming, too, wherein the W in the WX is meant to indicate workstation, and the non-W Threadripper is for HEDT. AMD claims up to 26% faster throughput on the newer 96-core 9995WX compared to the 7995WX. Meanwhile, against the Intel Xeon w9-3595X, AMD expects utter dominance from its 9980X with up to 108% faster performance. Even the lowest gain, says the company, is 22% over the Intel chip, and that is still very significant. AMD also compared the AI performance of the 9995WX vs the Xeon w9-3595X. The company promises up to 49% faster LLM processing, but keep in mind that the figures given include a GPU as well. Besides AI, performance related to other creative and professional workloads was also shared. In Keyshot rendering, for example, AMD claims up to 119% gains over the Xeon SKU. And in Chaos V-Ray, the 9995WX is said to offer nearly 2.5 times the performance. AMD has not released pricing information for the Threadripper 9000 series.
    • Funk Microsoft - I would switch from PS5 as you have better deals but the Xbox interface (I tried One S and later on, even one X i hate the interface and considering all MS changes in Windows interface over the years.. I hope they have a good one coming ps5 has also weird interface I had to get used too. But considering the library of ps4 games I wanted to be playable for me… I got used and adapted
    • I loved Sonic CD so much. I think I must have almost worn out that disc!
    • For what it's worth, if the game was scheduled for a September release, then most if not all of art assets, etc. were complete. That's the really expensive part of any AAA game. So going back into the code, game play, combat loop, etc. should be much easier and faster than re-imagining the look of the game entirely. That took years and zillions to create.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Ian_ earned a badge
      First Post
    • Explorer
      JaviAl went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Reacting Well
      Cole Multipass earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Reacting Well
      JLP earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Rhydderch earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      653
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      267
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      218
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      188
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      146
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!