If there's one thing Microsoft can't build right...

By Reacon
in General Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Reacon

Posted
Posted

... It's brand reputation.

Geeks, let alone normal consumers, will never part with their old habit of typing out "M$", and regardless of their current tone of advertisement, Apple has already set in our minds that Microsoft products are insecure and prone to viruses.

For the better part of the decade leading up to the release of Windows 7, Microsoft have steadily lost their brand respect, while Apple have been working on quite the opposite. The change was gradual, but a combination of buggy drivers, being the majority target of malicious software, and the association with business and work eventually lead to being labelled as simply "uncool" and "bad". Surely Microsoft did not intend for this to happen, and while it is certainly not entirely their fault, it definitely happened.

As positive to Microsoft as this forum tends to be, it is not reality - we are not the majority. We are knowledgeable enough to judge a product based on its performance and quality, rather than its brand. But given the fact that even a layperson tech enthusiast these days holds a negative opinion of Microsoft, it would seem that the damage is too fargone at this point. Perhaps I can elaborate on why.

Let's rewind to a decade long past, when the computer finally makes its jump from business, to home and recreation application. The start of the information age.

In a burgeoning market for personal computing, computers still require a small amount of knowledge to use. A basic understanding of what more RAM actually does, for instance. By relinquishing hardware decisions to the customer, Microsoft offered a degree of freedom to ice their new, intuitive GUI cake. The market of the mid-late 90's welcomed this freedom of choice, and they monopolised this tidal wave to ride it straight to the top.

Fast forward to the mid 2000's, and Microsoft have not only paved the road, but has driven computing right up to the doorstep of daily first-world life. It is no longer acceptable to lack internet access and a PC of your own. The PC is now no longer an opt-in for those with an enthusiasm for technology. The PC has become a necessity.

With computers now being force fed into the households of any who wishes to make it in today's world, the consumer no longer cares about performance, about versatility and modularity. The consumer merely wants her browser to work so she can check her email and Myspace. She doesn't have time to care about and understand why Sims is very choppy - she wouldn't be on a computer if it were still an enthusiast device, but now she can't imagine living without it. Unfortunately for her, there are not only performance problems and pesky Windows updates to contend to, but there are certain groups that take a mal-intented interest in the average, helpless user's PC.

Enter Apple. Now that personal computers have broken into the mindless majority market. With an "invulnerability" to viruses, a reputation for being bug-free, and a controlled hardware ecosystem, the new target market for personal computers welcomes them with open arms. Price is of no obstruction to them, because Apple tell them they are state of the art machines years beyond any buggy "PC". But most importantly, to the user, the machines "Just Work," and seldom malfunction.

As such, by the means of their own rise, Microsoft begin to decline. If Microsoft manage to soar with fifteen years of dead weight on their brand, it will certainly be the success of the decade. But I guess we'll see come the quarterly report.

So let's face it: Despite being technologically superior in nearly every way, the Surface will not make a sizeable dent in iPad's sales. Despite raving reviews, the consumer is still highly sceptical that it won't catch a virus and fall apart in their hands.

Windows Phone 7 was largely unattractive to the cell phone market in America due to "Windows" branding, and nobody ever cared to buy a Zune over the likes of an iPod.

Such is reputation.

Grand Master

Reacon

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Huh?

It just amazes me the amount of deluded positivity that inhabits this forum, when just about everywhere else in the world it's the exact opposite.

I'm sure you're enjoying your Windows Phone and Windows 8, but the fact is that the majority will never know about the true capabilities of either.

Grand Master

vcfan

Posted
Posted

same delusional nonsense from apple fans.

if what you said was true, then macs wouldn't have %4 marketshare, then Microsoft wouldn't have sold 750 million windows 7 licenses in a few years. Microsoft wouldn't have sold 4 million upgrades only to windows 8 in 4 days.

So you've just proved what others who want to appear like they are educated in technology and its history have, that you get your tech info from blogs like engadget and the verge. you guys have no real idea of the market. go into a best buy and watch the swarm of people in the windows computers section.

oh I know whats going on. apples had the ipad out for a few years now without Microsoft ,who has been developing their product in that time, and all the apple cheerleaders are running around saying we won without actually having a competitor in the race. so enter Microsoft,and now all you guys know whats coming,so to make yourselves feel better you go around all the Microsoft forums and blogs and try to spread your BS to try to distort reality and what is going to happen very soon.

all I gotta say is enjoy your posts like these for the short term,because you guys will be sent back where you belong, %4 marketshare enjoy.

Grand Master

Reacon

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Still hearing only what you want to hear, eh Neowin? Note just to the left, that I use Windows as well. I can't stand Apple, but I'm not going to ignore the truth about where Microsoft is headed.

"Too little too late" in the phone and tablet market, when the computing is transitioning largely to more mobile platforms. Fewer and fewer people are sitting at home on their desktops like we are now. Microsoft may hold a majority in the x86 market, now and probably until the architecture dies (due to the software ecosystem), but I'm convinced that's just not where the world is headed. We see Microsoft, late to the party with little in the way of true innovation (kickstands and covers, as nifty as they are, do not count).

They made a damn good product, but they didn't shake the industry like Windows 95 did, of which no less is required to make an impact in an already saturated market.

Mentor

Digitalfox

Posted
Posted

Ok I'll bite. :)

I'm a iPhone user since 2008, and because of that I tend to be a regular in Apple news sites, say AI, MR, iC, iM, etc...

I like to know what new updates are coming and when and of course new technology. Like jailbreak's etc...

Neowin, might be a "fanboy" home for many Windows folks, but there's still good points on favor and against Microsoft stuff around here. On those sites?

My god Apple is like a GOD that can do no wrong, no matter what stupid decisions or even when ripping people of. I like to read those forums just to make sure I'm still in the possession of my brain.

And to be honest, I do believe (even if I dislike a lot Metro, see I can say what I like or dislike around here) it's the right track what Microsoft is doing.

I also believe Microsoft has give a dolphin bite to Apple with Surface that could became a shark bite (This recent management changes are more than meet the eye). "Oh but it's still no where near the iPad sales". Right, but do give it some time and let's see.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

... It's brand reputation.

Geeks, let alone normal consumers, will never part with their old habit of typing out "M$", and regardless of their current tone of advertisement, Apple has already set in our minds that Microsoft products are insecure and prone to viruses.

Geeks and normal consumers don't write MS, anti fanboys do, mostly of the tweenage FOSS variety. Though some of the Mac variety do as well, but that's just funny, like the split and beam thing.

Veteran

rfirth

Posted
Posted

"Too little too late" in the phone and tablet market, when the computing is transitioning largely to more mobile platforms. Fewer and fewer people are sitting at home on their desktops like we are now. Microsoft may hold a majority in the x86 market, now and probably until the architecture dies (due to the software ecosystem), but I'm convinced that's just not where the world is headed. We see Microsoft, late to the party with little in the way of true innovation (kickstands and covers, as nifty as they are, do not count).

The desktop isn't dying. It isn't going anywhere. But x86 and x86-64 might. But when the desktop market shifts gears and moves over to ARM, Microsoft will be ready and waiting with Windows RT. Windows RT (Windows 8.5/9 RT) is only going to get more powerful as ARM processors get better and built into more devices like laptops, desktops, and servers.

And there is no "too late". You have to think long term. This isn't a race to a finish line. There is no finish line.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

Also people didn't not buy the first gen WP sets because of Window, 99% of them didn't even know they had anything windows on them. They sold bad because of salesmen who didn't care about the customer, but about selling their favorite phone systems.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By Hamid Ganji · Posted

      Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG

      By datacenter · Posted

      Will test it, thanks!
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By Steven P. · Posted

    • Laptop Processor Question

      By +Edouard · Posted

      Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Laptop Processor Question

      By Steven P. · Posted

      Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!