• 0

Show Off Your Website Here


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

My site isn't really relevant.

Just made one where I collect interesting trailers:

http://www.paranormalmovies.org/

I thought your second navigation (the one closer to the content) was broken for a second till I realized you went with a 2-color nav. Kinda cool but I would try to make the the bottom color closer to the top color so it doesn't appear broken to visitors.

  • 0
http://digiex.net/ - I really need to work on the theme, I think the one i did on VB3 looked miles better. Had to start again with VB4 and never really had time to perfect it, especially for the CMS. Just need to find the time to sit down and do something about it.
  • Like 2
  • 0

mines it

http://www.haggistech.co.uk

I dont use it for anything other than playing with code

even the news storys are copied and pasted from other sites just so i had content to work with lol

  • 0

Here's my site: http://7pmtech.com

Is that your site!? Cool. I used that alot after getting win8!(if you know what I mean xD) Really loved it and was glad I found such a resource easily. Well done

http://seapip.com

I really need to update it :p

Love all your work! Everything I see of yours is just to my taste! Loving the animated css background!

  • Like 3
  • 0

http://seapip.com

I really need to update it :p

Wow, talk about a "clean" interface ... :|

VERY nice

Here's my "semi-work-in-progress-hopefully-will-finish-one-day"

http://www.gamechug.com

:D

(nowhere near as good as what you guys have)

  • 0

Has very poor contrast though.

They call that a monitor screen that is wrong configured lol (over saturated)

But I need to update it as I said and I want to improve the contrast with the bg and content but the text is dark enough and not a contrast problem in my opinion.

oh before I forget my site has also other color schemes (and yes the contrast on these is way too low :p):

http://seapip.com/#charcoal

http://seapip.com/#ocean

  • 0

They call that a monitor screen that is wrong configured lol (over saturated)

But I need to update it as I said and I want to improve the contrast with the bg and content but the text is dark enough and not a contrast problem in my opinion.

oh before I forget my site has also other color schemes (and yes the contrast on these is way too low :p):

http://seapip.com/#charcoal

http://seapip.com/#ocean

The contrast between the background of the content/tabs and the text colour doesn't come close to meeting WCAG AA for example.

  • 0

The contrast between the background of the content/tabs and the text colour doesn't come close to meeting WCAG AA for example.

I know that those styles fail at the contrast standard that's why they aren't default.

Also the default style is quite low contrast which needs to be changed* but haven't had time to do that yet have been working too much on my projects ^^

* edit: not changing I mean, was planning to rewrite.

  • 0

rofl

let's stay ontopic instead of trolling xD

LoL, sorry,.... is just that i had the "pleasure" of working in Tandem with that agency, and boy do they think too high of themselves.

Ok, sorry, back in topic, your website looks awesome, and as a GOOD designer should know, dont adhere to standards, just "best practices" otherwise you will kill all design innovation. :)

  • 0

blog is in my sig...

but if you got that turned off then

http://remixedcat.blogspot.com

my other sites are in the sidebar of that

early preview of a thing i'm playing with

  • 0

LoL, sorry,.... is just that i had the "pleasure" of working in Tandem with that agency, and boy do they think too high of themselves.

Ok, sorry, back in topic, your website looks awesome, and as a GOOD designer should know, dont adhere to standards, just "best practices" otherwise you will kill all design innovation. :)

Fraid not.

And a good web designer thinks about the content first. If the content is hard to read then it's a pretty big stumbling block right out of the gate. In this case the standard is very much a "best practice".

  • Like 2
  • 0

I thought your second navigation (the one closer to the content) was broken for a second till I realized you went with a 2-color nav. Kinda cool but I would try to make the the bottom color closer to the top color so it doesn't appear broken to visitors.

Hmm good idea. I'll give that a try when I have time. going out right now. :)

Thanks mate.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!