Blizzard Sued over Battle.net Authentication


Recommended Posts

Dumb. #1 It's optional and not mandatory.

It is mandatory. Blizzard security is not first class. In fact this is probably one of the less secure online service around.

I got my battle.net account hacked even if i was using a perfectly secure password 10 random digits (numbers and letters with a cap and a special) that was unique. I did not have any keyloggers on my system and did not fall for any scam or phishing. All the addons was clean addons millions of people use like dbm and i downloaded them using my 2nd PC. Never bought money i farm my own things. The PC was clean as it is also my work PC and i never use it to browse sites that are not offcial or forums (like neowin) or to check hotmail or gmail. This is my work PC and it is used to work only (check my work emails, browse msdn and such) and also play games since it is a good machine. I use my 2nd less powerful PC to browse the web and do not so much secure things. I'm 100% sure the breach came from Blizzard side.

I never got hacked ever. Not before not after. Hotmail never hacked. Gmail never hacked. Guild Wars 1 and 2 never hacked. Live never hacked. I think most people using battle.net without an auth got hacked at least once.

I will honestly not shed a tear for Activision Blizzard after faction change. They got greedy and i would call this karma. Well deserved class action lawsuit.

i was forced to use one by blizzard after my account was comprimised or they wouldnt reinstate my account, and hell it was thier fault my account was comprimised not mine

I can't wait to hear your explanation as to how its Blizzard's fault your account was compromised.

I never got hacked ever. Not before not after. Hotmail never hacked. Gmail never hacked. Guild Wars 1 and 2 never hacked. Live never hacked. I think most people using battle.net without an auth got hacked at least once.

Yeah, not even close.

Since Blizzard doesn't even make passwords case sensitive, it opens everyone's accounts up to being hacked rather easily. Doesn't take long for people to brute force a password, especially when you don't have to do capital letters anywhere.

Blizzard has posted time and time agian, if you don't have an Authenticator, you are compromising your account. That if you do get hacked, it will be harder to get anything back because you "Didn't take ALL the avenues to secure it."

Due to blizzard basically saying in the past that an Authenticator is needed to keep your account secure, they have opened themselves up for this.

Doesn't matter what you think, because the law doesn't work that way. There is merit to this suit, although in reality, it is stupid.

capitals doesn't necessarily make your password safer.

password_strength.png

Sure it does. It adds an extra layer of protection. You could have horseapplestaplebattery, or you could have HorseaPPlestaPLEbatterY, which would make it even more complex. It doesn't make sense to leave an option out that only helps strengthen something.

Not sure the lawsuit makes sense, unless the guy wants restitution for the $4 or so it costs to get the authenticator. For those almighty people here saying that the hacking is "Your fault!" not Blizzards, you may want to research the issue and see how many people with and without authenticators have been hacked. I myself was hacked, and had a very very good password for the account as well as an authenticator; now, before you say "well, it had to be your computer!", i give you some info about my pc and me. I am an IT manager who has worked for companies such as Symantec IT internal department, MessageLabs IT internal department and now a private Chemical plant, again internal IT deparment....so with all that in mind, i have made sure that my PC IS as secure and clean as possible, not only for a stupid game, but also to make sure information on my pc is not compromised.

I also ran wow clean, without addons etc, and any updates were all downloaded using the client....so when my account got hacked, i made sure to do before calling blizzard a full forensic analysis of my machine, including firewall logs, av scans, spyware scans, etc, etc, etc......what i found was that my computer was clean, and my account was hacked either directly from Blizzard or my isp had some issues with man in the middle attacks, and blizzards traffic encryption had or has been compromised (do not know which).

So, going back to the suit.....smart? maybe, depends what the person wants, if he wants restitution for the authenticator then sure, have blizzard refund his $4 or so...anything else is a joke, although having blizzard change some of their warnings or making them give out warnings when something does happen like getting hacked would be nice.

While many times it's the user's fault for being hacked, there are times when they truly did nothing wrong.

I have 2 WoW accounts for example, both with strong unique passwords not used anywhere else. My main one has an authenticator on it, and was never hacked. My old one however, despite not being in use anymore, didn't have an authenticator. 2 years of having not logged into that account, I receive an email that the account has been suspended. Not exactly sure what the hell they did to break into the account, as my password was strong, unique, and hadn't even been used for 2 years...

Same thing happened to a friend of mine with his Guild Wars account.

So yeah, I'm quite under the belief that if you don't have an authenticator, you will likely be hacked eventually. Doesn't matter if hasn't happened thus far, it's still possible, even if your account isn't in use.

---

Anyway, I'm definitely no fan of Blizzard these days. Still, I think this case is just straight baloney. :sleep2:

While many times it's the user's fault for being hacked, there are times when they truly did nothing wrong.

I have 2 WoW accounts for example, both with strong unique passwords not used anywhere else. My main one has an authenticator on it, and was never hacked. My old one however, despite not being in use anymore, didn't have an authenticator. 2 years of having not logged into that account, I receive an email that the account has been suspended. Not exactly sure what the hell they did to break into the account, as my password was strong, unique, and hadn't even been used for 2 years...

Same thing happened to a friend of mine with his Guild Wars account.

So yeah, I'm quite under the belief that if you don't have an authenticator, you will likely be hacked eventually. Doesn't matter if hasn't happened thus far, it's still possible, even if your account isn't in use.

---

Anyway, I'm definitely no fan of Blizzard these days. Still, I think this case is just straight baloney. :sleep2:

Are you sure those weren't phishing emails like the ones every gets regardless of if they even play the game?

Are you sure those weren't phishing emails like the ones every gets regardless of if they even play the game?

No, but I do get those as well. I never open them, and they're properly placed in the spam section of Gmail. I worked with Blizzard to have the account restored, simply for the fact that it was my account and I didn't want anyone using it for whatever malicious purposes. Also slapped the iOS authenticator on it for (free) added safety.

Sure it does. It adds an extra layer of protection. You could have horseapplestaplebattery, or you could have HorseaPPlestaPLEbatterY, which would make it even more complex. It doesn't make sense to leave an option out that only helps strengthen something.

But it only makes it more complex to remember.

Are you sure those weren't phishing emails like the ones every gets regardless of if they even play the game?

I know in my case it wasn't. I know which ones are real/fake but even then, for ANY link dealing with accounts, I always check to see if the link is actually valid. I've never had anything hacked before.

This is pretty common with WoW. Lots of people I've known that practice good computer security stopped playing WoW and then had their accounts hacked (they didn't have authenticators). Authenticators are pretty much a requirement now or you're guaranteed to get hacked...

Not by much. And the added security can only help.

Not really, there's a level where security peaks and there's not really a point in adding further security anyway, and it does make it significantly harder to remember when random stuff in the password is upper cased.

Personally my password isn't technically nearly as complex as the base password there. but in reality it's more secure and shorter and doesn't rely on any special cases, and I don't get hacked.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!