Even Microsoft Stores selling out of Windows Phone 8 handsets


Recommended Posts

Ben Rudolph has tweeted this picture, taken at the Bellevue Microsoft Store, earlier today, indicating that the store has run out of both the Nokia Lumia 920 and the HTC 8X.

Twitter is also full of potential buyers hunting from store to store trying to find a Nokia Lumia 920 in particular, which seems to be the one that is in shortest supply.

http://wmpoweruser.com/even-microsoft-stores-selling-out-of-windows-phone-8-handsets/

I can understand this - I think the L920 looks like the 'perfect' phone for ME. I want solid design, only glass at the front (id actually prefer the samsung plastic screen). Good res, moderate screen size, LTE.

The only issue i may have is with WP8 - i haven't checked out the details of it, and I just hope they've made it 'business ready'... and that they've got it up to par with a few features other OS' have (because, face it, its missing a few things other OS' has - while it does also have features they don't have, which i love)

Oh...and that I can get this lovely phone in Aust for a reasonable price!! (USA price + shipping to be specific)

Edit: The 8X doesn't have LTE in Aust I don't think =(

The Lumia 920 looks like a great phone but it's way too expensive and the non-removable battery really hurts it, especially given most reviews say it lasts less than a day during normal usage. If it's selling out it's not because it's selling more than the iPhone 5 or the Galaxy S3 - it's because there weren't as many available to start with.

The Lumia 920 looks like a great phone but it's way too expensive and the non-removable battery really hurts it, especially given most reviews say it lasts less than a day during normal usage. If it's selling out it's not because it's selling more than the iPhone 5 or the Galaxy S3 - it's because there weren't as many available to start with.

How much are they selling the 920 for where you live? Over here it's one of the less expensive phones, especially when considering all the specs.

How much are they selling the 920 for where you live? Over here it's one of the less expensive phones, especially when considering all the specs.

To get it on 4G it's ?36 / $57 a month with a 24-month contract, while the handset costs ?130 / $206 - the basic plan has unlimited calls and texts but only 500MB of data. That means it costs ?994 / $1578 in total, with a data package that is simply too small for a 4G phone. Oh, and the nearest 4G area from me is over 170 miles away. For the 8GB package it would cost ?1364 / $2165.

It's only slightly cheaper than the iPhone 5 (the only difference is the cost of the handset). My contract isn't up for renewal until next June so it's too far away for me to be thinking about what to get, though the Lumia 920 is certainly one of my favourites at the moment - I'm just really annoyed that the battery isn't changeable and that it's so expensive for what it is.

How much are they selling the 920 for where you live? Over here it's one of the less expensive phones, especially when considering all the specs.

In the UK it's currently as expensive to buy sim free as the Galaxy S3, and more on contract.

To get it on 4G it's ?36 / $57 a month with a 24-month contract, while the handset costs ?130 / $206 - the basic plan has unlimited calls and texts but only 500MB of data. That means it costs ?994 / $1578 in total, with a data package that is simply too small for a 4G phone. Oh, and the nearest 4G area from me is over 170 miles away. For the 8GB package it would cost ?1364 / $2165.

It's only slightly cheaper than the iPhone 5 (the only difference is the cost of the handset). My contract isn't up for renewal until next June so it's too far away for me to be thinking about what to get, though the Lumia 920 is certainly one of my favourites at the moment - I'm just really annoyed that the battery isn't changeable and that it's so expensive for what it is.

I guess I'm used to paying too much for my phone service. I pay $89 a month for "unlimited" service. I wish they would reduce my monthly rate if I bought the phone "off contract" for $449.

The Lumia 920 looks like a great phone but it's way too expensive and the non-removable battery really hurts it, especially given most reviews say it lasts less than a day during normal usage. If it's selling out it's not because it's selling more than the iPhone 5 or the Galaxy S3 - it's because there weren't as many available to start with.

Huh, all the reviews I've seen say it lasts well over a day with heavy review usage.

In the UK it's currently as expensive to buy sim free as the Galaxy S3, and more on contract.

It should be more expensive just because it doesn't have a terrible Samsung smiled screen that tints blue/green if viewed at a slight angle :p

I guess I'm used to paying too much for my phone service. I pay $89 a month for "unlimited" service. I wish they would reduce my monthly rate if I bought the phone "off contract" for $449.

I pay 74$/month (before taxes, comes out to 85$ or so after), on a 3 year contract with my Atrix (cost me 75$ when I got it, was on a promo + counted as new contract, would have been ~600$ to buy outright)

200 minutes

Fab 10 (Unlimited Talk / Long Distance with any 10 numbers)

Unlimited Text Messaging

Unlimited Picture/Video Messaging

1GB Data

Standard Long Distance Fees

Caller Display

Voice Mail

Still over the course of 36 months, I'll have paid ~3100$

Huh, all the reviews I've seen say it lasts well over a day with heavy review usage.

Well, given that it only has a 2000mAh battery that seems remarkably unlikely. TechRadar said "with careful usage you will be able to get a whole day's use out of the Nokia Lumia 920, but if you actually want to use you brand new phone for more than just a couple of calls and few texts you'll need to watch the battery". CNET said "it certainly won't last an entire working day".

Those reviews were from major sites, so it's not like I'm just trying to dig up dirt on the phone. Virtually every review I've seen has complained about the battery life. Some reckon that it can last over a day, with others adamant that it can't.

Here's what WPCentral had to say about the phone's battery:

Battery life on the phone is decent. It won?t set any records nor will it send you running for a charger every few hours. The Snapdragon S4 is said to be very nimble with the battery (here at 2000 mAh) and so far from our experience this is accurate. After 8 hours of heavy usage?a few phone calls, lots of photos, 30 minutes of a gaming, push services?we?re at 54% with a whopping 18 hours of estimated battery left. In short, no complaints and we think Nokia got the right balance here.

I'd trust TechRadar but I certainly wouldn't trust anything that CNet has to say.

Well, given that it only has a 2000mAh battery that seems remarkably unlikely. TechRadar said "with careful usage you will be able to get a whole day's use out of the Nokia Lumia 920, but if you actually want to use you brand new phone for more than just a couple of calls and few texts you'll need to watch the battery". CNET said "it certainly won't last an entire working day".

Those reviews were from major sites, so it's not like I'm just trying to dig up dirt on the phone. Virtually every review I've seen has complained about the battery life. Some reckon that it can last over a day, with others adamant that it can't.

Well it doesn't match up with what other reviewer have said. also I don't find it remarkably unlikely at all, but then I'm used to the remarkable ability of WP to save on battery, whereas my current android will eat battery even if I don't use it, and if I try to use a GPS app or play a game... then it's gone in a second.

Even the best battery saver apps for Android don't match what's built into WP, and at best only badly mimic WP's ability to do sensible stuff like turn off radios that aren't necessary whent he screen is on, only turning on 3G and WiFi intermittently to check mails or other stuff. the problem with android is that such a battery savign feature isn't built into the core OS, which means even IF a third party tool could add a feature like this, the apps wouldn't know about it and either wouldn't find the necessary radio's off, or they would constantly make the battery saver app turn them on. instead of the OS turning it on for a quick "check updates" round, and informing all the apps that "hey, it's time to check for updates".

even so the reviewer use the phones heavily and the off screen battery saving doesn't even factor in to the battery time on the 920. and 54% left after 8 hours of heavy usage seems like more than enough for a day and a half of usage to me. something I don't see many Android phones able to do, maybe except the Razr MAXX, and that's not because it's so energy efficient ;)

If the marketing holds up the way MS makes it sound and the sales reps in the stores don't try to make you buy something else when you even ask for a WP8 device then it should sell well.

Well it doesn't match up with what other reviewer have said. also I don't find it remarkably unlikely at all, but then I'm used to the remarkable ability of WP to save on battery, whereas my current android will eat battery even if I don't use it, and if I try to use a GPS app or play a game... then it's gone in a second.

I was only pointing out the reviews, which nearly all mention that it has poor battery life. Even the most favourable reviews only puts the battery life at little more than a day, which is pretty terrible for a phone without a changeable battery. Even accepting that WP is better with battery life than Android - which I'm not challenging - we're still talking about matters of degrees rather than factors. Lasting around a day is still bad by any objective measure. It means you have to moderate your usage and be looking to recharge it whenever possible. Most of the positive reviews that you mention base their praise upon the specs rather than real world usage - on paper it's a reasonable battery but lasting at best a little more than a day is poor.

Don't get me wrong, I think it looks like one of the best phones on the market but the lack of a replaceable battery and its weight give me cause for concern. It wouldn't be as much of an issue if I could simply carry an extra battery or two around to be safe, which I do with my current phone. Sometimes I like to play games while I'm out and about and carrying an extra battery allows me the flexibility to do that - with the Nokia Lumia 920, Apple iPhone 5 or the HTC One X you can't do that because of their non-changeable batteries.

The Lumia 920 ticks most of the boxes and the wireless charging facility is brilliant but by the time my contract expires in about 6 months I'm sure they'll be something better on the market.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!