Facebook auto sign used as stolen laptop locator?


Recommended Posts

Facebook auto sign used as stolen laptop locator?

So I helped a girl out remotely with her computer this morning and then 2 hours after that when she returned from lunch someone had stolen her DSLR and her new laptop. So that made me think. What would have been on her computer, which could possibly help locate it? There was no anti-theft technology. But then I had a thought. What if she had her computer log her into automatically to Facebook? She told me she never uses Facebook on that computer, which sucks, but what if she had? Facebook keeps track of all of the locations you log into your Facebook from. So if a thief were to have obtained her machine, taken it home, connected it to his internet and proceeded to log into Facebook by going to Facebook.com, it would have logged her in automatically her into her account.

She could then go to her Facebook profile settings under security and Active sessions. She would then see her laptop log into to her Facebook account and the IP address it was done on.

So while it?s not perfect, it would be better than nothing.

At first I thought you were telling a heroic story about how you actually did this, then it turned sad, lol. You could potentially use this method with any website that she could automatically log into though, not just Facebook, or websites that support logging in with Facebook, like Neowin, since even though the user didn't actually sign in on Facebook.com, they authenticated with the Facebook servers.

Don't all modern Windows OSs "phone home" to ensure they are geunine when they are connected to the internet? So if she knew her Windows service tag, Microsoft could potentially tell you the IP that the computer checks in from. Then again, that adds a 3rd party to the mix, Microsoft, and not just the ISP, so you increase overhead and the time it would take to find the laptop.

At first I thought you were telling a heroic story about how you actually did this, then it turned sad, lol. You could potentially use this method with any website that she could automatically log into though, not just Facebook, or websites that support logging in with Facebook, like Neowin, since even though the user didn't actually sign in on Facebook.com, they authenticated with the Facebook servers.

Don't all modern Windows OSs "phone home" to ensure they are geunine when they are connected to the internet? So if she knew her Windows service tag, Microsoft could potentially tell you the IP that the computer checks in from. Then again, that adds a 3rd party to the mix, Microsoft, and not just the ISP, so you increase overhead and the time it would take to find the laptop.

True, but it works better on a website that the thief is more than like going to go to first.

Gmail also tracks and lets you view the IP address that the account has logged in from. But that doesn't really get you anywhere.

Simply having the IP address doesn't get you any closer to getting it back. You'd have to go through the police to get a warrant from the service provider to trace the IP to the physical location, which takes days, not minutes. By the time the police got the warrant (which they likely would not, because you don't really have enough evidence) the laptop would be long gone.

Why not load this on all of your computers you touch. It works really well and is open source.

http://preyproject.com/

Yep, there are plenty of tools out there. The problem in this scenario though was that it was an end user who didn't think to install anti-theft software. Prey is supposed to be a great one. (Y)

But yeah, something like Facebook or Gmail would work if the user set the computer to automatically log them in when they went to the site. Obviously it's not an optimal solution, but it's some good thinking for a tough situation.

Why not load this on all of your computers you touch. It works really well and is open source.

http://preyproject.com/

Good stuff, but for prey the user has to be pro active in installing it in case their PC gets stolen. With the facebook method, it would potentially be something the average user already had setup which might help them to find their pc.

Yep, there are plenty of tools out there. The problem in this scenario though was that it was an end user who didn't think to install anti-theft software. Prey is supposed to be a great one. (Y)

But yeah, something like Facebook or Gmail would work if the user set the computer to automatically log them in when they went to the site. Obviously it's not an optimal solution, but it's some good thinking for a tough situation.

"So I helped a girl out remotely with her computer this morning"

He touched it, if it were standard protocol he would recommend it or install it for them. He is the expert and should recommend certain things like antivirus, sandboxie, etc (which he already does). She already stated that she doesn't use facebook so facebook or gmail or anyother app would require the end user to do something. end users don't do anything until something bad happens to them.

He touched it, if it were standard protocol he would recommend it or install it for them. He is the expert and should recommend certain things like antivirus, sandboxie, etc (which he already does). She already stated that she doesn't use facebook so facebook or gmail or anyother app would require the end user to do something. end users don't do anything until something bad happens to them.

Oh don't get me wrong, I try to remember to recommend various security tools to my "external" clients whenever I can. But this came across as more of a "whoops, this has now happened, I wonder if there is some way to progress" type thread rather than suggestions for future users. But you're right, as tech enthusiasts/workers we should always be recommending these kind of tools. I always recommend Lookout to people when I see that they have an Android, I should really make a more regular habit of suggesting similar software for laptops and computers of friends and families. (Y)

"So I helped a girl out remotely with her computer this morning"

He touched it, if it were standard protocol he would recommend it or install it for them. He is the expert and should recommend certain things like antivirus, sandboxie, etc (which he already does). She already stated that she doesn't use facebook so facebook or gmail or anyother app would require the end user to do something. end users don't do anything until something bad happens to them.

Actually I don't recommend Sandboxie to regular people. It would drive them nuts.

It all depends really on who nicks the laptop.

If some random joe bloggs nicks the laptop, yes you can track them if you've got software on it or whatnot.

If someone that actually knows what they're doing nicks it, you can guarantee the first thing they'll be doing is either (re)installing a different OS or formatting the drive, although then you've got things like the intelligent ethernet used on business intel laptops that sends 'secret' ethernet packets to help track it - although once again these can be defeated.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
    • NTLite 2026.06.11200 by Razvan Serea NTLite is a Windows configuration tool that allows you to modify your existing Windows install or an image yet to be deployed, remove Windows components, configure and integrate, speed up the Windows deployment process. Reduce Windows footprint on your RAM and storage drive memory. Remove components of your choice, guarded by compatibility safety mechanisms, which speed up finding that sweet spot. Windows Unattended feature support, providing many commonly used options on a single page for easy setup. Easily integrate a single or multiple drivers, update or language packages. Package integration features smart sorting, enabling you to seamlessly add packages for integration and the tool will apply them in the appropriate order, keeping hotfix compatibility in check. One of the important new features of NTLite (compared to its predecessors) is the ability to modify an already installed the operating system, by removing unnecessary components. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8.1 and 7, x86 and x64, live and image. Server editions of the same versions, excluding support for component removals and feature configuration. ARM64 image support in the alpha stage. Does not support Checked/Debug, Embedded, IoT editions, nor Vista or XP. NTLite 2026.06.11200 changelog: New Secure Boot Migration support: Verification, certificate staging, and boot-manager/sector update across the Image, Updates, Apply, and Create-ISO pages (2023 CA migration, optional 2011 revocation, Anti-rollback, Boot sector choice etc) Secure Boot Host Readiness: Live host Secure Boot migration monitor and Servicing-task control Option under Image page - C:\Windows row, or load the host as the target - Updates - Secure Boot Image: 'Sort mounted images first' option for the image list in Menu-Settings UI: Hover description card for Components and Unattended pages, selectable text and quick access to Compatibility options Command line: Relay commands into the already-running instance Enables controlling already running NTLite via ntlite.exe Use /NewInstance to launch an additional instance using CLI operations (premium) UI: 'New instance' option via main menu instead of a secondary ntlite.exe prompt Apply: Hide individual Apply-page notes with a per-note dismiss (X), critical excluded Settings: 'Unsigned RDP file launch warnings' tweak (RDP client), bypassing the April 2026 security-update prompt on RDP connections Upgrade Image: Live OS and deployed image editing now unlocked on free/test licenses, same licensing as images Image: 'Recompress' option in manual dialog Remove Editions to shrink the WIM in one session Image: SWM part size set inline on the Apply page and image dialogs, split-size popup retired Image: Relative 'Last change' dates; editions grouped by build time to reduce noise Image: 'Forget - Missing' on the Edit-cache menu to mass drop entries whose folder is gone Components: Root groups reorganized - user-facing groups first, system/critical last Components: Show filter options to view components by Template or App-type, since Apps are now merged into groups Presets: Delete confirmation now lists the multi-selected preset names UI: Design update propagated to the rest of the tool UI: Filter and search match words in any order and partially, better results filtering Components Unattended: Input-locale language derives from the user locale, with an independent keyboard picker, enables combinations previously unavailable Unattended: Input-locale now allows for a user value override Unattended: Localization OOBE WinPE now can be copied with the new WinPE Copy OOBE localization toggle, enter locale settings once for both stages Updates: Downloader greys and locks updates the image already carries (hotfix and MSIX) Updates: Resume interrupted update downloads Command line: Many upgrades, see /?, now prints help to the console or redirected output UI-Translation: Finnish language added, also thanks for Chinese Traditional (Matt), French (tistou77), Italian (clarensio), Russian (RDS), Swedish (1FF), Vietnamese (Vu Anh Vu) Fix Components: Containers removal breaking Apps deployment Components: Microsoft Account had leftovers when Easy Migrate is kept Image: Export to an existing WIM improvements, Append renamed to Merge Image: Improved 26H1 live removal support Image: No more 'X:\ not accessible' popup for certain drives during image scan Presets: Manual image refresh picks up presets added/removed outside the app Tweaks: Disabled visual-effect animations no longer return after first logon on a new profile Tweaks: Live Visual Effects toggles (animations, drag full windows, font smoothing) now apply correctly Download: NTLite 2026.06.11200 | 20.5 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Link: NTLite Home Page | NTLite Features | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!