Recommended Posts

Ok, I'm fixing a pc for a friend. When I turned on the computer I was blocked out by some dumb message about copyrights and wanting to pay $200. Finally was able remove some of the files, delete from start up, etc. installed spy bot search and destroy, ran the scan and removed all entries. Used the pc on and off for a few days. No issues. Gave the pc back... Within 2 days...it's back. Is there a better freeware scanner/remover for this. I'm at my wits end with this.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1120426-need-help-removing-virusmalware/
Share on other sites

1. Boot in safemode

2. Empty ALL temp folders, including user temp folders, not just windows

3. Reset IE, checking the box to delete everything

4. Open regedit:

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run

and

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run

Delete any suspicious looking entries

Also delete anything in HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE that look malware related

Open MSCONFIG and disable anything that looks suspicious in there too

----------

Reboot in normal mode, and run a full scan with a fully updated malwarebytes

You have already scanned with spybot but do it again anyway

Another good thing is installing Avast Free, and do a "Boot Time Scan" this will be able to remove malware that can not be killed inside of windows

Download and run a scan with "Hijack This" remove any suspicious entries in there too

Scan a couple of times with all the above programs until they all return a clean result

If you still have a problem after all that, wipe > reinstall windows

  • Like 3

What exactly would be considered suspicious? I'd assume they would label anything that would set off red flags..

Well just anything you don't recognise as being installed on the machine as a genuine app, a lot of malware will have registry keys with weird symbols, such as !"?$%^&*&()_) or the name of the fake AV that pops up

Normally pretty easy to spot, the first 2 keys I mentioned are what windows calls to startup with windows, so if you don't want anything starting up with windows, delete those keys, and in MSCONFIG

Latest version is 2.04....It doesn't work properly with 64bit oses. It also doesn't dig as deep as otl.

Compare a hjt log with a otl log.

sample otl log

http://www.bleepingc...opic313328.html

sample hjt log

http://www.techsuppo...down-14837.html

which do you think is more thorough and can help you better find the cause?

Latest version is 2.04....It doesn't work properly with 64bit oses. It also doesn't dig as deep as otl.

Compare a hjt log with a otl log.

Ok, never used OTL, still HijackThis is a decent app, using both would be better than not using HJT, never had a problem with HJT and 64bit OSs though

read about hjt and 64 bit, while this isn't necessarily a problem people unfamiliar with it will go to disable critical processes and screw their computers up more. I don't recommend running this as a novice, nor do I recommend running it over the internet being that people can be tempted to try to fix it themselves causing more issues. bottom line, it doesn't work well with 64 bit oses and otl produces the similar findings as hjt with many more pieces to the os puzzle (more files, more reg entries, more points of infection, etc). Running otl with a good rootkit detection software, like gmer, will allow you, the tech, to actually find something useful and be able to repair the computer.

http://www.experts-e...it-Systems.html

That being said, it may take a few hours to go through and verify a otl report.

read about hjt and 64 bit

http://www.experts-e...it-Systems.html

Well that doesn't render HJT useless on 64bit systems, we're not looking for missing file entries, we're looking for malware entries, make no difference if HJT can't find 64bit files

And more to the point, I don't know many 64bit versions of malware

Well that doesn't render HJT useless on 64bit systems, we're not looking for missing file entries, we're looking for malware entries, make no difference if HJT can't find 64bit files

And more to the point, I don't know many 64bit versions of malware

not exactly useful either. if it is not useful, it is useless IMO.

you could do what others said and waste your time, or do what will be the easiest. Download a 10 meg file mawarebytes.com from here (filehippo link) on to a usb key. Boot into safe mode, install, run a scan, let it remove it. Done. If you want to do it the hard way, follow the other posts above.

Secret....malware bytes doesn't remove everything. Their root kit detection piece is still in beta last time I checked. Malware bytes is not the end all be all.

I have been around a lot of malware, and I can tell you with 100% certainty that malware bytes doesn't remove all of it. Just a good portion. I run a min of three different removal utilities mwb being one of them when cleaning computers. Mwb isnt the first thing i run, it is the last. I do know its limitations.

Secret....malware bytes doesn't remove everything. Their root kit detection piece is still in beta last time I checked. Malware bytes is not the end all be all.

I have been around a lot of malware, and I can tell you with 100% certainty that malware bytes doesn't remove all of it. Just a good portion. I run a min of three different removal utilities mwb being one of them when cleaning computers. I do know its limitations.

after servicing a couple thousand machines over the last couple years , i have had a 100% success ratio with malwarebytes when scanning in safe mode. Could you give me an example of malware that it can't remove? I would like to download it and see for myself.

note: i LOVE getting new stuff to test virus removal techniques. being serious.

Pick any root kit. The Remote Desktop attack 6months ago it couldn't detect (MSE was the first that did). Had problems finding, file name was close to a windows file name and I kept overlooking it.

I have been doing manual virus removal since late 90s. I have thousands over you. Hell, the hospital I was working at had a whole site infection over 10000 computers and hundreds of servers. Nightmare.

Pick any root kit. The Remote Desktop attack 6months ago it couldn't detect (MSE was the first that did). Had problems finding, file name was close to a windows file name and I kept overlooking it.

I have been doing manual virus removal since late 90s. I have thousands over you. Hell, the hospital I was working at had a whole site infection over 10000 computers and hundreds of servers. Nightmare.

could you give me even just 1 name of a rootkit that you could not remove with it? the worst one in your mind/experiance

you could do what others said and waste your time, or do what will be the easiest. Download a 10 meg file mawarebytes.com from here (filehippo link) on to a usb key. Boot into safe mode, install, run a scan, let it remove it. Done. If you want to do it the hard way, follow the other posts above.

This. Why make the removal process difficult?

could you give me even just 1 name of a rootkit that you could not remove with it? the worst one in your mind/experiance

Is it that hard to google root kit names, like I said pick one any one. Pull any one out of a google search. Malware bytes is 100% ineffective against any root kit. It doesn't have the scan engine for it, therefore it can't detect or repair against this type of infection. Google redirect is one.

Here you go read through and you will see that the user running malware bytes has no effect against it. http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic434638.html

Huh? How is it not useful ?

What do you have against HJT ? It works, what more do you want ?

I don't like doing things twice and skimming through information I have been through before.

Is it that hard to google root kit names, like I said pick one any one. Pull any one out of a google search. Malware bytes is 100% ineffective against any root kit. It doesn't have the scan engine for it, therefore it can't detect or repair against this type of infection. Google redirect is one. Here you go read through and you will see that the user running malware bytes has no effect against it. http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic434638.html I don't like doing things twice and skimming through information I have been through before.

Ok, well each to their own, lets not hijackthis thread with our differences ;)

Is it that hard to google root kit names, like I said pick one any one. Pull any one out of a google search. Google redirect is one.

Surprised you could not give one from your own extensive experiences and instead saying Google one. I am having no luck finding an .exe for the google redirect to infect myself with. Google is full of solution links and no actual download links (of course and expected). Do you know where i can get the .exe file? Or maybe a website that does give the infection?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
    • OpenAI is making Codex more useful in Chrome and the cloud by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI's Codex now has more than 5 million users, up nearly 4x from earlier this year. To further accelerate Codex's growth among developers, OpenAI today announced that it has agreed to acquire Ona, a company that builds secure cloud execution and orchestration technology for developers. Ona will enable developers to run Codex with persistent and controlled cloud infrastructure for long-running agentic workflows. Right now, most Codex execution happens locally on developers' laptops and PCs, and the agents work continuously for hours. Through Ona, OpenAI aims to make Codex agents keep working for days without being tied to a user’s local machine or an active session. This will be an important capability for enterprises that want to deploy AI agents in production while maintaining control over infrastructure, data, security boundaries, credential scope, logging, and review workflows. Like any acquisition, the deal is still subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Until the deal closes, OpenAI and Ona will continue to operate as separate companies. After closing, Ona’s team will join the Codex team to improve developer workflows. Alongside the Ona acquisition announcement, OpenAI today introduced a few Codex updates. Developers can now save Codex rate limit resets and use them later instead of losing them when they are not needed immediately. OpenAI is also adding a referral option where users can invite a friend to Codex and get a saved rate limit reset. OpenAI today also announced a developer mode for browser use in Chrome and the Codex in-app browser. With this mode, Codex can use the Chrome DevTools Protocol to debug web apps, inspect pages, and work more directly with browser-based development workflows. Developers can use this when they want Codex to profile JavaScript, inspect console output and network traffic, examine web page states including the DOM and applied styles, and more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      186
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!