Recommended Posts

I have been looking at firewalls to purchase to mess around with. I had a monowall but that computer died. I don't want to spend a lot of money, but I want something that is going to let me VPN and open ports. I don't want to use a home router just simply because..

I have found a Fortinet 50B for around $150, these where made in 2007.. I am not sure if it would be a good idea to buy a firewall that doesn't get firmware updates anymore..

I am leaning more towards this one,

http://www.amazon.com/ZyXEL-Internet-Security-Firewall-Dual-WAN/dp/B0042WCFI2/ref=pd_cp_e_0

Not real sure with that brand but it has a lot of good reviews.. However, you have to buy the VPN client software to VPN in.

I have also looked a bunch of different Sonicwalls but I heard do not buy a used one because if it has been registered before on mysonicwall you won't be able to use it

I am also considering this one,

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122380

If I had to buy one, I would go with the Fortinet but I don't know if it good to buy a older firewall..

Feel free to add any suggestions..

  • 5 months later...

Running it as VM has loads of advantages, one less equipment - means less power consumption as well ;) Two since I run development code of pfsense, I just take a snapshot before I do an update if something doesn't work in the update or fails, click back to my stable setup. This advantage would be there if not running development as well for when you update, but I update every few days to a couple of weeks whenever I see a new snapshot from pfsense that makes sense to go too or its been a few weeks. Currently there is issue with renewing your IPv6 address, so been updating every few days hoping for a fix, etc. It is not renewing, so you have to turn it off and grab a new one - which changes the PD your getting, so annoying when your IP range keeps changing, etc.

Three - since its VM, I can swap out any firewall distro I want very quickly never having to touch a wire. And if I setup the same mac on the different VM, I don't even have to reboot my modem, and maintain my public IP as the same, etc. So I can try out smoothwall if I want, untangle, or m0nowall, etc. etc. Or drop back to stable 2.0.2 version of pfsense if need to test something for someone, etc.

Unless your setup required too much horse power at your router/gateway for VM to make sense I don't think I will ever go back to a dedicated box for my gateway.

Running it as VM has loads of advantages, one less equipment - means less power consumption as well ;) Two since I run development code of pfsense, I just take a snapshot before I do an update if something doesn't work in the update or fails, click back to my stable setup. This advantage would be there if not running development as well for when you update, but I update every few days to a couple of weeks whenever I see a new snapshot from pfsense that makes sense to go too or its been a few weeks. Currently there is issue with renewing your IPv6 address, so been updating every few days hoping for a fix, etc. It is not renewing, so you have to turn it off and grab a new one - which changes the PD your getting, so annoying when your IP range keeps changing, etc.

Three - since its VM, I can swap out any firewall distro I want very quickly never having to touch a wire. And if I setup the same mac on the different VM, I don't even have to reboot my modem, and maintain my public IP as the same, etc. So I can try out smoothwall if I want, untangle, or m0nowall, etc. etc. Or drop back to stable 2.0.2 version of pfsense if need to test something for someone, etc.

Unless your setup required too much horse power at your router/gateway for VM to make sense I don't think I will ever go back to a dedicated box for my gateway.

yeah, I had it running on a VM and I loved it, but I had to get rid of my ESXi host for my house.. too Loud.. lol I need to get a rack and put it my basement

My pfsense, my file server vm my linux play box this runs 24/7/365 and then all my other play vms when I need to play with something, 2k8 box, 2k12, centos, win7 boxes, win8 vm, ntop I can fire up if want to look at traffic, freebsd, etc. etc.. Couple different copies of pfsense.

Its got 8 gb of ram - which is enough to run a few vms at once. I found out later you can bump up to 16 even though specs list 8 as max - which I might do at some point, its got 4 nics in it currently. With 4 drives, the 250GB it came with as datastore for the vms, and then 3 other disks a 2TB and 2 x 750GB for my file server - which I gave raw access to the vm and get like 50 to 70MBps file transfer off of. More than enough to play my media off of etc..

I could add 2 more disk if need be, just not in the bays. And its got esata so could add a 7th, and then usb so you could add more drives that way if you needed too. I got it on sale for like $269, plus the extra memory and nics -- you just can not beat it for a home esxi setup.

post-14624-0-40520200-1366596360.jpg

I think the new model is the N54L - same box really, I show it currently at newegg for $339

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16859107921

Which is not a bad price..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!