Recommended Posts

boot into safe mode with command prompt.... its an exe usually located in C:\Users\<username>\ or C:\Users\<username>\appdata

sometimes its under C:\ProgramData too, deleted the exes reboot and run malwarebytes, its not that hard really ... all these malwares are the same

I offered to fix one of my teacher's daughter's laptops and she has this virus (don't worry link is safe): http://blog.yoocare....fine-to-unlock/

Along with a ton of other viruses/malware/crapware/etc. She is running Windows 7 and has a ton of personal data on it (so she says). I'm doing the job tomorrow. I'm here to tell my plan of attack and take suggestions.

1. I'm going to boot into safe mode with networking and remove those registry entries as shown in the tutorial in the link above.

--I'll take 2 Advil before doing this... :argh:

2. I'm going to remove the crapware

--So I can get some f***ing work done. It's slowing down her machine and clogging up the computer. I will use:

* Revo Uninstaller

* CCleaner

3. Go ham on the malware

- Get all the other crap off. I will use:

* Malwarebytes

* Spybot

* Install MSE when all is said and done. (It's my antivirus of choice)

4. General System maintenance

* Update Drivers

* Update Programs

* Do Windows Updates

What Do ya think?

Boot LiveCD. Copy files. Reformat. Reinstall files. Done.

4. If you're doing your job correctly you're not going to miss something. That's my point. If you're so worried that you're going to miss something, then you're not as confident in your abilities as you should be.

The only problem with that, is that there are no tools or practices that will fully identify, quarantine, and clean a computer with 100% accuracy and guarantee. No anti-virus or malware tool will catch everything. A multi-pass reformat of the drive and its boot sectors is the only way to be sure you have cleaned the infection.

/Facepalm...

LIke I said...we're going in circles. You want to spend your time not learning how to properly clean an infection...cool.

Make sure the next time you hear a knock in your engine that you just drop the whole thing out and replace it then...after all...proper diagnosis and repair is worthless.

Yeah because cars problems have the same principle as PC problems...

FYI, you're just going to lose people's respect if you start demeaning yourself to trolling... Just saying.

Settle down... There's no reason to flip out just because people don't agree with you.

Perhaps for starters, you have to understand the context of the OP's situation. He's saying this is a severely infected machine, so that probably means it's not going to be an easy fix via a virus scan or combo fix. If the infection regenerates, then you'll just be wasting your time trying to get rid of every trace of it.

I still stand by my belief that a backup and reinstall is much quicker. I do it all the time for my client, and it makes both of us feel better knowing that it's a clean slate. Backing up files takes a few minutes to an hour or two, unless they have multiple GBs in media. Then reinstalling Windows takes maybe 30 min via USB. Copy back the files, and you're done in a couple hours and will have full performance.

I'm not saying you're lying, but if it only takes you 3 hours tops to fix any sort of infected machine, then you must not have seen anything severe. Running a full virus scan alone takes an hour or more depending on how fast the PC is. Then anything additional just tacks on more time. The biggest problem I see on PCs is that it's either not fully updated or there's too much crapware installed. A fresh install solves every single one of these problems in minimal time. But again, look at the context of this thread. If the PC is not clearly crippled, then yeah a reinstall probably isn't the best answer.

Flip out? Wow...lol. Dude I'm sitting drinking Game Fuel laughing my ass off. If you think an internet forum makes me flip out...you should see what I've done for the past several years as my day job. :p

The virus cannot replicate if the code isn't running. If the hard drive is scanned offline and handled properly you can clean ANYTHING off it.

As regards severity...I've seen everything man. You do this long enough and work on thousands and thousands of machines...you end up seeing it all. I've seen machines with literally hundreds of infections.

I once had to kick the primary IT guy out of a server room (ends up he's the one who infected the machine by sneaking to view porn in the first place) so that I could clean a machine that we couldn't afford to actually flatten. He hadn't been doing his job and making backups...and our job required that things stay up and running. It was a mission critical type of business (emergency response and such).

Now that one was fun...and the longest case I've ever had to deal with since there wasn't a way to take this system offline without taking the whole place down...

The only problem with that, is that there are no tools or practices that will fully identify, quarantine, and clean a computer with 100% accuracy and guarantee. No anti-virus or malware tool will catch everything. A multi-pass reformat of the drive and its boot sectors is the only way to be sure you have cleaned the infection.

Whoa! Hold up! You mean to tell me this crap can jump from the main partition to the hidden recovery partition? In my situation is this a possibility?

Yeah because cars problems have the same principle as PC problems...

FYI, you're just going to lose people's respect if you start demeaning yourself to trolling... Just saying.

It's called a comparison. If you were knowledgable about how vehicles work these days you would understand that it's an apt comparison.

That said I'm not trolling, but you can keep claiming that all you want. Feel free to add me to your ignore list...it's pretty easy to do on here, and I won't mind. :)

And you say a full scan takes around an hour? Yeah right, I had old computers that a full scan took 3 hours to complete because A) it was a slower drive and B) they had so much stuff on it.

I have seen a full scan (even from Malwarebytes) take longer than a format and install would take. Even the quick scan on somebodies machine took 35 minutes!

Whoa! Hold up! You mean to tell me this crap can jump from the main partition to the hidden recovery partition? In my situation is this a possibility?

Infections can hit any point on a system in order to hide. They can even create their own small hidden partitions.

That's what we were talking about earlier with rootkits and MBR infections and such. Those can still be cleaned...but for those who aren't certain they are 100% capable of doing so the best option is to back up and do a low-level format as those can be nasty.

And you say a full scan takes around an hour? Yeah right, I had old computers that a full scan took 3 hours to complete because A) it was a slower drive and B) they had so much stuff on it.

I have seen a full scan (even from Malwarebytes) take longer than a format and install would take. Even the quick scan on somebodies machine took 35 minutes!

As I said...going in circles....

If you don't want to see my posts or deal with what I say...just add me to your ignore list...it's easy and I won't mind. ;)

Oh and btw...show me where I said that a full scan takes an hour...show me a single place where I stated that.

I said the longest an infection has taken me to clean is a total of about 4 hours...the scan is usually the longest part of things. It's the cleanup where I'm extremely efficient.

Infections can hit any point on a system in order to hide. They can even create their own small hidden partitions.

That's what we were talking about earlier with rootkits and MBR infections and such. Those can still be cleaned...but for those who aren't certain they are 100% capable of doing so the best option is to back up and do a low-level format as those can be nasty.

If this machine does have a rootkit, I can remove it by opening up gparted in a Kubuntu live CD, deleting the small partition (it'll probobly be a few megs. right?), merging it with the big partition and if it doesn't boot, boot into a 7 install CD, open up CMD and type /fixmbr and /fixboot. Right?

Infections can hit any point on a system in order to hide. They can even create their own small hidden partitions.

That's what we were talking about earlier with rootkits and MBR infections and such. Those can still be cleaned...but for those who aren't certain they are 100% capable of doing so the best option is to back up and do a low-level format as those can be nasty.

As I said...going in circles....

If you don't want to see my posts or deal with what I say...just add me to your ignore list...it's easy and I won't mind. ;)

Oh and btw...show me where I said that a full scan takes an hour...show me a single place where I stated that.

I said the longest an infection has taken me to clean is a total of about 4 hours...the scan is usually the longest part of things. It's the cleanup where I'm extremely efficient.

you didn't and that's actually why a few people including me were confused at why you were able to clean so fast

i've had the experience of waiting 3 hours for a scan too

Infections can hit any point on a system in order to hide. They can even create their own small hidden partitions.

That's what we were talking about earlier with rootkits and MBR infections and such. Those can still be cleaned...but for those who aren't certain they are 100% capable of doing so the best option is to back up and do a low-level format as those can be nasty.

As I said...going in circles....

If you don't want to see my posts or deal with what I say...just add me to your ignore list...it's easy and I won't mind. ;)

Oh and btw...show me where I said that a full scan takes an hour...show me a single place where I stated that.

I said the longest an infection has taken me to clean is a total of about 4 hours...the scan is usually the longest part of things. It's the cleanup where I'm extremely efficient.

I thought you did somewhere, maybe it was somebody else. My apologies. But, you said yourself that you can fix ANY computer within only a couple of hours.

A regular PC repair shop though...you can take the time to properly clean the machine. I can be done with that even in the worst of cases within a couple hours.

If it takes you longer, you obviously do not know what you are doing and need to change professions. I just told you from experience, ONE SCAN took 3 hours. That is all I mean, is that from my own experience, just one scan took longer than a format and install would have taken.

If this machine does have a rootkit, I can remove it by opening up gparted in a Kubuntu live CD, deleting the small partition (it'll probobly be a few megs. right?), merging it with the big partition and if it doesn't boot, boot into a 7 install CD, open up CMD and type /fixmbr and /fixboot. Right?

naw, you don't even need to do that much, kaspersky and Norton both have a couple great rootkit removers (about the only thing norton is good for :p) that will do that for you

If this machine does have a rootkit, I can remove it by opening up gparted in a Kubuntu live CD, deleting the small partition (it'll probobly be a few megs. right?), merging it with the big partition and if it doesn't boot, boot into a 7 install CD, open up CMD and type /fixmbr and /fixboot. Right?

For rootkits it depends. Generally TDSSKiller is the best way to go, but it doesn't get everything. There are a few other tools that can be used.

When it comes to rootkits though...those can be a pain. That's why I said if it's the case where the person doesn't care so much and you're not 100% sure you can get it...then there is nothing wrong with doing a low-level format and reinstall once everything is backed up.

It took me a while to figure out rootkits and the best ways to clean them. I have a system that I infect on purpose on a regular basis with new stuff as it comes out so I can work on manual cleans.

With an infection this bad I find it the easiest to go into safemode first and go through the registry by hand and scan the registry for unneeded entries. Then go into services and make sure you didn't miss anything. Then I go and delete the files manually. Then I use ccleaner and an antivirus.

you didn't and that's actually why a few people including me were confused at why you were able to clean so fast

i've had the experience of waiting 3 hours for a scan too

Indeed, and that's why I've said that the scan is usually the longest part. Once I know everything that's on the system I can go in and do a very quick clean since once I know what it is I know what to get rid of. :)

After that I do another scan of the system and make sure it's all good.

I think one thing I do differently is that I always handle the scans offline. I don't bother with scans when the system is up and running unless there's absolutely no other option...which has only happened once.

I thought you did somewhere, maybe it was somebody else. My apologies. But, you said yourself that you can fix ANY computer within only a couple of hours.

If it takes you longer, you obviously do not know what you are doing and need to change professions. I just told you from experience, ONE SCAN took 3 hours. That is all I mean, is that from my own experience, just one scan took longer than a format and install would have taken.

Indeed. I should have said few instead of couple. The max for me is about 4 hours. That's to scan and clean, and scan again.

As I mentioned above...it might have to do with how often I infect my test machine, and the fact that I do my scans offline. That cuts out a lot of time.

I do agree that it's faster than a format and install...but only a format and install. That ignores putting all of the data back on the machine exactly as it was when you got it.

Maybe it's just my work ethic, but I want my customer to walk out with their machine exactly as they gave it to me...just minus the infections.

Flip out? Wow...lol. Dude I'm sitting drinking Game Fuel laughing my ass off. If you think an internet forum makes me flip out...you should see what I've done for the past several years as my day job. :p

The virus cannot replicate if the code isn't running. If the hard drive is scanned offline and handled properly you can clean ANYTHING off it.

As regards severity...I've seen everything man. You do this long enough and work on thousands and thousands of machines...you end up seeing it all. I've seen machines with literally hundreds of infections.

I once had to kick the primary IT guy out of a server room (ends up he's the one who infected the machine by sneaking to view porn in the first place) so that I could clean a machine that we couldn't afford to actually flatten. He hadn't been doing his job and making backups...and our job required that things stay up and running. It was a mission critical type of business (emergency response and such).

Now that one was fun...and the longest case I've ever had to deal with since there wasn't a way to take this system offline without taking the whole place down...

I'd classify post #38 as a mild flip-out, but whatever.

If you've seen it all, then there's no way you can fix any sort of scenario in the short duration of a few hours.

Unless you have a single app that will fix everything, running scans alone and actually diagnosing the problem kills hours and hours.

Scanning/diagnosing, fixing, and updating takes a lot of time and there is no way around it in even the best case.

The right way to fix a system is the method with a combination of the lowest time spent (customer cost) and the best future reliability. All I, and a few others, have been saying is that it doesn't take much for a backup and reinstall to be the fastest and most reliable choice.

I'd classify post #38 as a mild flip-out, but whatever.

If you've seen it all, then there's no way you can fix any sort of scenario in the short duration of a few hours.

Unless you have a single app that will fix everything, running scans alone and actually diagnosing the problem kills hours and hours.

Scanning/diagnosing, fixing, and updating takes a lot of time and there is no way around it in even the best case.

The right way to fix a system is the method with a combination of the lowest time spent (customer cost) and the best future reliability. All I, and a few others, have been saying is that it doesn't take much for a backup and reinstall to be the fastest and most reliable choice.

So saying that I'm baffled and stepping back because I don't want to **** people off is flipping out?

Man I'd hate to see what you'd call someone actually flipping out. ;)

You can try to tell me the same thing over and over again...and it doesn't change what I've been doing for years...without an issue.

The way I do things is the reason why I've worked for the government, and why places like MS have me consult on things and even contract my work at points.

I'm good at what I do, and security happens to be one of my specialties.

Personally if you don't know what to do and you have to question yourself you might not want to take someones personals things and do the work.

This ^^

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Ditto that, I have a few Alexa devices around the house to control lighting and such for a disabled person I live with, and it shows a *lot* of ads on the display. The dots are simple but effective. A lot cheaper too.
    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!