Do I really need to buy a commercial security tool? or free ones do the sam


Recommended Posts

I use Microsoft Security Essentials and the built in firewall, is all I need, and it's all free. I see no real point in paying for security software that generally all it dies is annoy most of time while doing just as good and sometimes worse than the free alternatives

Microsoft Security Essentials or Win7 and earlier. Windows Defender (basically the same thing as MSE) for Windows 8, since it is built-in to the OS.

I also tend to just use the built-in firewall on Windows since I have a hardware firewall that's setup properly. :)

on windows 7 i used microsoft security essentials combined with my common sense and experience in computers. never had any harmful thing on my computer.

on windows 8 i use the built in defender.

as many other pointed out, you do not need a commercial security suite. imo it's kinda useless...

Tell you my firewall setup? Sorry, but I'll decline to share that, especially with how often I have people try to get in.

Ofcourse not asking for sharing your firewall setting.

You mentioned hardware firewall, so I've asked about what kind of hardware and not the settings!

Tell you my firewall setup? Sorry, but I'll decline to share that, especially with how often I have people try to get in.

telling someone your firewall setup is like telling someone what type of car I have....

At work I have a ASA 5510. At home I have a ea6500 with some qos based on device, certain devices that stream get priority over pc's.

o how it is setup, like every other standard firewall. I have some ports open for email servers, ftp, www, and https.

go ahead and hack away at my networks...what exactly have I given out that pertains to anything having to do with who I am or what my address is for you to do such a thing? I can even give you a firewall config if you want out of my asa...I will mask the external ips...again what exactly would that give anyone trying to get in my network...absolutely positively nothing.

Ah. I still prefer not to mention my specific hardware...trust me if you knew my situation you'd understand. ;)

I get hits about 100 times a minute with bots trying to get in, probably more, haven't checked in a while.

telling someone your firewall setup is like telling someone what type of car I have....

At work I have a ASA 5510. At home I have a ea6500 with some qos based on device, certain devices that stream get priority over pc's.

o how it is setup, like every other standard firewall. I have some ports open for email servers, ftp, www, and https.

go ahead and hack away at my networks...what exactly have I given out that pertains to anything having to do with who I am or what my address is for you to do such a thing? I can even give you a firewall config if you want out of my asa...I will mask the external ips...again what exactly would that give anyone trying to get in my network...absolutely positively nothing.

Spoken like someone who isn't an SME in network security. :)

I spent years working security for various folks...government and big corporations.

There are certain things I will discuss when it comes to security, and certain things I won't.

The hardware that protects my personal network? That's not one of the things I will talk about...again due to the number of attempts I have from people trying to get in...in this case any information is too much information. :p

I get hits about 100 times a minute with bots trying to get in, probably more, haven't checked in a while.

This isn't your usual bot attacks. I actually have specific folks that are not a fan of me that love to try to screw around with my stuff on a regular basis.

I've had to ream several large corporations out for handing out my PII like it's candy.

Ah. I still prefer not to mention my specific hardware...trust me if you knew my situation you'd understand. ;)

Sorry, but you always seem to talk about this sensitive information you have access to, or be vague about issues which suggests you're privy to info mere mortals like us are simply unable to know about or comprehend. No disrespect intended, but how would telling someone your opinion about anti-virus/security software compromise your security, exactly? No one is asking you to reveal anything about your security setup, just what might be useful to the average user. Actually, if you are particularily skilled and learned about security, your opinion would be specifically useful to the OP.

To address the OP's question: MSE seems to work pretty well. I don't know how it works where you are, but in Australia some banks actually offer free anti-virus/security software from third parties for free. Right now I am running bitdefender with a 12/mo license and I didn't pay a cent for it. I wouldn't have shelled out for it personally, but free is free.

Sorry, but you always seem to talk about this sensitive information you have access to, or be vague about issues which suggests you're privy to info mere mortals like us are simply unable to know about or comprehend. No disrespect intended, but how would telling someone your opinion about anti-virus/security software compromise your security, exactly? No one is asking you to reveal anything about your security setup, just what might be useful to the average user. Actually, if you are particularily skilled and learned about security, your opinion would be specifically useful to the OP.

To address the OP's question: MSE seems to work pretty well. I don't know how it works where you are, but in Australia some banks actually offer free anti-virus/security software from third parties for free. Right now I am running bitdefender with a 12/mo license and I didn't pay a cent for it. I wouldn't have shelled out for it personally, but free is free.

It has nothing to do with comprehension or my views on the level of people (ie the mere mortal thing). I can talk about my knowledge and experience, but will not talk about what particular hardware I use for securing the network.

This won't change no matter who is asking. I haven't refused to offer my views on specific questions like what I think of Product A, or Software B. I just won't state what I use.

If I told you even a quarter of a half of what goes on and why I won't comment you'd think I was making it up or a paranoid dude...and neither is the case.

Suffice it to say due to projects I've worked on I'm a fairly high-profile target in certain communities...so I've made the choice to not give out that data.

Spoken like someone who isn't an SME in network security. :)

I spent years working security for various folks...government and big corporations.

There are certain things I will discuss when it comes to security, and certain things I won't.

The hardware that protects my personal network? That's not one of the things I will talk about...again due to the number of attempts I have from people trying to get in...in this case any information is too much information. :p

This isn't your usual bot attacks. I actually have specific folks that are not a fan of me that love to try to screw around with my stuff on a regular basis.

I've had to ream several large corporations out for handing out my PII like it's candy.

lol ok...

BTW, I have secured government networks, smb networks, large enterprise networks...Sorry I call bs on your knowledge or trival garbage you may think you know. Giving you anything on my config pertains to nothing that you couldn't get from looking at any standard doc from cisco. I wouldn't hand out my trust ips of my site to site vpns or private vpns and do you think I would be stupid enough to give you my secure hash on my asa or even post anything other than config? I can give my interal ips as they don't matter for squat. What exactly is 192.168.1.x going to give or 10.x.x. or 172.16.x.x? Those are all private ranges that any company can use....as a matter of fact the us government uses 10.x.x for their networks, as well as td bank, as well as citibank, as well as....... go for it hack in.

I have secure networks that don't have access to anything or have routes outside of their network with 172.16.200.x feel free.

lol ok...

BTW, I have secured government networks, smb networks, large enterprise networks...Sorry I call bs on your knowledge or trival garbage you may think you know. Giving you anything on my config pertains to nothing that you couldn't get from looking at any standard doc from cisco. You think I would be stupid enough to give you my secure hash on my asa or even post anything other than config? I can give my interal ips as they don't matter for squat. What exactly is 192.168.1.x going to give or 10.x.x. or 172.16.x.x? Those are all private ranges that any company can use....as a matter of fact the us government uses 10.x.x for their networks, as well as td bank, as well as citibank, as well as....... go for it hack in.

I have secure networks that don't have access to anything or have routes outside of their network with 172.16.200.x feel free.

/Facepalm

Did you really try to tell me that you're a subject matter expert while posting that?

No one asked about what private ranges I use. Hell I know grade school kids who understand what a private range is and that there's a very limited range of them...you're not impressing anyone.

You're still not getting me to talk about my particular setup so you can quit digging.

Some people lol...they think they can bully info out of you by tossing out stuff anyone should know...and acting like an internet tough guy...

I have to admit today has been very amsuing. :D

I am not digging, just stating you aren't as smart as you think you are or really that impressive for me to go out of my way to screw with you and you really have that tin foil hat on real tight.

never said I was or wasn't an expert in the subject matter, nor was anything really questioned for me to give a response to in said subject matter. I know where I am and what I do for a living and so do my employers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!