Recommended Posts

Currently using Win 7 Pro 64bit.... but have entertained the idea of playing with Linux to learn more about it.

My main intention is to explore the possibility of using it as a business computer... so are there alot of

programs out there that work as well as what is available on Windows?

I've always heard Linux didn't have alot of business based progs, but seems like that should be

changing now, right?

Is there a list of business programs available for Linux somewhere that rates each prog

with maybe some user reviews for each. That'd be helpful to help me educate myself on Linux.

Eventually, I'll just throw another hard drive in my box to boot from when going in to Linux

so I can do some testing in real time by actually using it. Is Ubunta the best way to go?

Any thoughts you guys may have to help my Linux education would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1121848-questions-bout-linux/
Share on other sites

Well with Ubuntu- There is the easy option of using WUBI - which is a "true" install running on your hardware. This version does not overwrite the boot record , but runs inside a folder on your drive inside a compressed image.

I would suggest that method - due to the fact that it does not overwrite your boot record.

This also has the removal through the Windows add or remove (programs and features) uninstall method.

You should give it a try first- Then once you are in then you can look at the package manager to see other things that can be installed.

Like Hawkman said, if you want to try it out, download a copy of Ubuntu, and then Install Virtualbox. Then try playing around with it inside a sandboxed environment. If after a while you find that you're not enjoying using Linux, simply delete the Virtual machine. Saves you having to deal with Dual booting or any of that. :)

With regards to applications, there are a lot of business-style applications available. LibreOffice offers spreadsheet and databasing capabilities. If you need more advanced databasing there are plenty of large-scale database applications that run on Linux (e.g. SQLite, etc). For media there's a wealth of media players out there (VLC, etc).

There's also the possibility of running your Windows applications on Linux using WINE, although in many cases you might not get them to work completely (see the Wine Application Database to know how well applications worked for other people).

In my thinking, virtual and emulate are the same thing.

I have to disagree, though. To try it, in get used to it, yes it's great, but to use more advanced applications, VM is not your best option.

I'd really rather run it on it's own hard drive since I can set things up where my computer will boot up normally (to my current OS) and I'd have to manually make it boot to the drive running Linux. This way, I can work with it hands on... and if it works out, I can eventually use that drive as my main OS and make my computer boot to that first.

If it didn't work out and I didn't want to continue, then that drive can easily be formatted and used as an external so it's no big deal as far as cost is concerned. I'll just have the government subisdize the experiment by writing the drive off my taxes since it is a business expense. :D

I would need to be able to do any and all things I can do with Windows as far as business apps are concerned. I'm just a general user of MS Office, and I know about Open Office which should run on Linux, and I do some graphics work, some audio work, some web design work.

Linux isn't going to be too different from Windows, is it? Is it faster than Win 7 64 bit? Not a deal braker, but quicker response times is always better, although eventually I'm going to get an SSD so that should speed up response times no matter which OS I'm using.

I figured I'd load it, and then start looking for programs to use to imitate all the progs I'm currently using on Win 7.

In my thinking, virtual and emulate are the same thing.

I have to disagree, though. To try it, in get used to it, yes it's great, but to use more advanced applications, VM is not your best option.

You are correct, but it give you better performance than a LiveCD, so you'll get a little better overall picture. As mentioned WUBI would be a good option, but Virtualbox is a good middle ground .

In my thinking, virtual and emulate are the same thing.

I have to disagree, though. To try it, in get used to it, yes it's great, but to use more advanced applications, VM is not your best option.

A couple of reasons why I think a VM is better:

  1. You get to go through the install process, which is important if you're looking to install a distro on your disk long-term IMO. It saves you the embarrassment of getting half way through the install and suddenly realising you don't know what you're doing.
  2. Persistence between sessions. Unless you're writing to your Windows partition on the live CD, you can't save your files. VM's allow you to do this, with the added benefit that if/when you choose to install proper, any settings you created in the VM can be copied over onto the full install.

Here's another good question... I've used Acronis True Image extensively for about 8 years now to backup my OS.... does anyone know if Acronic works with Linux?

It doesn't, but if you're dual booting you can do images of Linux partitions (EXT, some others). Depending on what distro you download, there are alternatives available that can do it for you in Linux, although I don't know how good they are.

OK, at least there are ways to do the same thing.

It's funny, I recently found a free version of Acronis on Western Digital's website at

http://support.wdc.com/product/downloaddetail.asp?swid=119

Not sure why Acronis would allow this since there's no need

to actually buy their program now...

Glad I found that because now if I have opportunity to help

someone with their computer, I can turn them on to this

program without them having to buy it.

OK, at least there are ways to do the same thing.

It's funny, I recently found a free version of Acronis on Western Digital's website at

http://support.wdc.c...il.asp?swid=119

Not sure why Acronis would allow this since there's no need

to actually buy their program now...

Glad I found that because now if I have opportunity to help

someone with their computer, I can turn them on to this

program without them having to buy it.

You'll probably find that it's restricted to people who have WD hard disks.

I'd really rather run it on it's own hard drive since I can set things up where my computer will boot up normally (to my current OS) and I'd have to manually make it boot to the drive running Linux. This way, I can work with it hands on... and if it works out, I can eventually use that drive as my main OS and make my computer boot to that first.

If it didn't work out and I didn't want to continue, then that drive can easily be formatted and used as an external so it's no big deal as far as cost is concerned. I'll just have the government subisdize the experiment by writing the drive off my taxes since it is a business expense. :D

I would need to be able to do any and all things I can do with Windows as far as business apps are concerned. I'm just a general user of MS Office, and I know about Open Office which should run on Linux, and I do some graphics work, some audio work, some web design work.

Linux isn't going to be too different from Windows, is it? Is it faster than Win 7 64 bit? Not a deal braker, but quicker response times is always better, although eventually I'm going to get an SSD so that should speed up response times no matter which OS I'm using.

I figured I'd load it, and then start looking for programs to use to imitate all the progs I'm currently using on Win 7.

I use my ubuntu laptop for..... Cisco mapping (packet tracer), java programming, word processing, network monitoring, skype, internet, streaming, torrenting and of course my job(on the side of being a student) ... php and sql development

I've heard of people using it with other drive brands.... and it's an older version, the 2009 Acronis so it's probably just basic.

I use it as a manual program and do not allow it to schedule anything. I'm a basic kinda guy on some of this stuff.

Anyway, it was kinda wierd to see that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!