Internal vs External Raid0 and 5 cards

By Cyber Akuma
in Hardware Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mentor

Cyber Akuma

Posted
Posted

Never setup a RAID system before, and what I want to do is a little on the unorthadox side. I am planning to setup the OS drive as RAID0 with SSDs and the storage to be RAID5 HDDs. The RAID5 isn't really going to be a problem, but I have a lot of questions about the RAID0.

First of all, the whole point of the RAID0 is read/write performance above all else, and the RAID5 for redundancy and fault tolerance. Would I then be better off getting a seperate card for the RAID0 array rather than use the motherboard's built-in RAID0? And if so, I would like to avoid if possible having two seperate RAID cards, are there any good cards that can handle both a seperate RAID0 and RAID5 array at the same time? And if so, would the performance of the RAID0 suffer?

I also know that Intel only a few months ago released an update to support TRIM over RAID0 on some of their motherboards, do any of the 3rd party RAID cards suppot TRIM over RAID0 yet? And is TRIM only used to increase the efficency and lifespan of the SSD, or does it improve performance as well?

Come to think of it, what are even some good brands of RAID cards that don't cost something ridiculous? All I get when searching Newegg are brands that I know are total junk like Rosewill or SYBA.

(P.S. Would I need PCI-E for the 0 or 5? Or would plain PCI be fast enough?)

Grand Master

Mindovermaster Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

For a RAID0, you need two drives. For RAID5, you need three drives.

A RAID card can do multiple RAIDs at a time.

What motherboard do you have? Most of them have just 2 or 3 RAID ports.

TRIM is only used by SSD's.

Get this: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16816124043

With RAID0 (2 drives) and RAID5 (3 drives)

PCI or PCI-e works about the same.

Proficient

Xenomorph

Posted
Posted

RAID0 (or "Suicide RAID") isn't really meant for your OS. It's more for a scratch drive, temp files, cache, etc. Stuff you 100% can do without. RAID0 increases your risk of data loss. Why would you want to run your OS on that???

For maximum uptime, multiple controllers are recommended. I'm guessing this isn't for a business system, just personal. A single card handling two RAID configurations is fine. Just remember that your CPU will be doing extra work (unless you get a "true", hardware, dedicated RAID card), so watch out if you have an older CPU.

PCI will limit you to way less than SATA II speeds. You want PCI-E or onboard (which should be PCI-E).

If you want the best (since you didn't mention OS), go with ZFS! RAID1 (2 drives) for your OS, and a RAID1 (2 drives), RAIDZ setup (3 drives) or RAID10 or RAIDZ2 setup (four drives) for your data.

Way more reliable and quicker than traditional RAID.

Grand Master

+BudMan MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

"RAID0 increases your risk of data loss. Why would you want to run your OS on that???"

Because its an OS - and there is no "DATA" to be lost with an OS. I would just reinstall or restore my last bare metal image image of my last backup. Time lost maybe what 30 minutes.

Unless this is a mission critical OS that can not go down on a drive failure, then raid 0 is fine for an OS. Since again there is nothing loss with a OS drive loss.

Mentor

Cyber Akuma

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sorry, I could have sworn I mentioned it in my initial post, guess I forgot.

I am planning to make the RAID0 array out of two SSDs and load my os, apps, and games on there.

And the RAID5 will be for storage and large files, which will be made up of four HDDs. Mostly disk images, video, etc. Typically non-executable data that doesn't need fast access times.

Practically nothing important that can't easily be re-installed/re-downloaded will be on the 0, plus its SSD, so any risks of data loss on it would be minimal, I want it purely for the performance gains.

And yes, its for a personal gaming/all-purpose rig, so performance for 0 and redundancy/fault-tolerance for 5 is the main importance, not uptime.

Grand Master

n_K

Posted
Posted

RAID0 doesn't double speed but it does increase it. You could just get a OCZ Revodrive which has a SSD RAID0 setup anyway.

In terms of RAID5 and the 'pci, pci-express does not make a difference' !? WHAT!? PCI has a theoretical maximum of 133MB/s transfer rate compared to up to 16GB/s with PCI-Express. For RAID, THAT DIFFERENCE IS HUGE!

DO NOT get a PCI raid card unless you are SURE the drives you are using are slow and old and you do not care about transferring taking a long time.

Grand Master

Mindovermaster Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

Looked up the RevoDrives, they are full of 1 out of 5 reviews on Newegg about them constantly failing after a few months, as well as costing more than just setting up a RAID0 would cost.

Never trust Newegg reviews. Get professional reviews.

Experienced

pes2013

Posted
Posted

Are some people posting on drugs or something?

First, if you are getting a RAID card, PCI-E. Don't even think about PCI. I don't even think there are new PCI RAID cards.

New and good (see below) RAID cards all support TRIM.

About above, if you can afford it, buy a hardware RAID card. Software RAID cards, although cheaper, will make you lose performance. I personally got a software RAID card for a (storage only) RAID5 and for now, it is more than enough for me.

And you are correct on putting non essential data (OS, apps, etc) on a RAID0. You WILL see a huge increase with SDD+Dedicated hardware RAID0 card+PCI-E. I think this cannot be stressed enough.

If I were you, Id use two seperete RAID controllers: One for your RAID5 another for your RAID0. Which on which is sketchy and depends what your hardware/software supports. Id put the RAID0 on the crappiest, featureless, slowest, etc controller you have since it is "not important". Also remember that most people do NOT consider RAID5 as a backup solution so yes, you will have a huge RAID5 but backing it up is a bitch...

Mentor

Cyber Akuma

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I was talking to a few people and was told that no RAID cards support TRIM over 0, only the internal RAIDs on Intel 7 series motherboards, and that there would be very little performance difference between motherboard RAID 0 on SSD and a RAID card for RAID0 on SSD. So I guess I will have to look for a mobo with the 7-series chipset and use the card just for RAID5.

Grand Master

Lord Method Man

Posted
Posted

RAID0 (or "Suicide RAID") isn't really meant for your OS. It's more for a scratch drive, temp files, cache, etc. Stuff you 100% can do without. RAID0 increases your risk of data loss. Why would you want to run your OS on that???

180 degrees out of whack. I can easliy reinstall my OS. I use RAID 0 for performance which is why I install the OS and programs on it. DATA is stored on a RAID 5 for integrity.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models

      By +pmrd · Posted

      The problem isn't with Epic, it's with the platform holders like Steam and Nintendo, they should be a lot more strict in their review process.
    • Nvidia 610.62 driver lands with big bug fixes and Empulse support

      By goretsky · Posted

      Hello, Installed here without issue. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with easier language model discovery and in-app search

      By zikalify · Posted

      Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with easier language model discovery and in-app search by Paul Hill Microsoft has released Visual Studio Code 1.125, its latest weekly release. This week, the company has focused on discovering and installing extra language models via the Marketplace; searching the web and securely browsing over remote connections without leaving VS Code; choosing how long VS Code waits before installing extension updates; and delivering managed Copilot settings through existing device management tooling. In older versions of VS Code, extensions could contribute their own model providers, but to find these extensions, you needed the right tags to search for in the Extension view. Now, the Language Models editor gives you an Install Model Providers button that opens the Extensions view, which is filtered to extensions that contribute model providers, making it easier to find and install them. Once you install a provider, its model will appear in the model picker. If you use the integrated browser much, you can now look up information without leaving VS Code by typing a query into the integrated browser’s address bar. It will use your configured search engine, the same way a standalone browser does. You can use workbench.browser.searchEngine to pick a search engine. When the browser is opened in a remote workspace, it's now possible to proxy HTTP(S) traffic via the remote connection. This allows you to connect to any ports or services that can only be accessed from the remote machine. If you read our coverage from two weeks ago about VS Code 1.123, you might have seen that extension updates have a two-hour delay as a safety measure. In this update, Microsoft is giving you the ability to configure the time of the delay. You can find it under extensions.autoUpdateDelay. Finally, with this update, admins can deliver managed GitHub Copilot settings through native device management (MDM) channels on Windows and macOS, in addition to account-based enterprise settings files. Settings delivered via MDM appear as policy-enforced in VS Code and can’t be overridden locally. Future updates will extend the supported policy keys across Copilot surfaces. You can download the update from the Visual Studio Code website now.
    • Microsoft will finally let you sign in to Edge with a Google account

      By monterxz · Posted

      "it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account" You already have a Microsoft account if you are using Windows 11, because you can't set it up without one.
    • This is how much iPhone 18 Pro could cost after Apple's price hike confirmed

      By Hamid Ganji · Posted

      This is how much iPhone 18 Pro could cost after Apple's price hike confirmed by Hamid Ganji Image via Apple Apple CEO Tim Cook confirmed in a recent interview that the company may have to raise prices on some of its products due to the ongoing memory shortage. While he did not elaborate on the scale of the price hikes, new estimates suggest that Pro iPhone models could become significantly more expensive this fall. The Wall Street Journal and research firm TechInsights have come up with an educated estimate of how much the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro could cost after its launch in September. The estimate is based on current increases in memory and storage chip prices. For starters, the iPhone 18 Pro base model is expected to feature 12GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage. According to TechInsights estimates, 12GB of DRAM for the iPhone 17 Pro cost Apple $39 last year. However, for the iPhone 18 Pro, the cost of the same amount of DRAM could soar to $145. Likewise, 256GB of flash storage that previously cost $13 could now cost around $51. Producing a base iPhone 17 Pro reportedly cost Apple around $582, but TechInsights estimates that the production cost of the iPhone 18 Pro could rise to $726. If Apple wants to maintain the roughly 47% profit margin it enjoys on the iPhone 17 Pro, the base price of the iPhone 18 Pro would need to reach $1,371. After standard pricing adjustments, customers could end up paying around $1,299 for the base model. However, that may not be the end of the story. As we previously reported, the iPhone 18 Pro is said to feature a variable-aperture lens, which could cost Apple at least 50% more than the current camera system. The estimated $1,299 price tag does not include the additional cost of this upgraded camera hardware. Once that expense is factored in, the base model could cost at least $1,399. A $1,399 price tag for the base iPhone 18 Pro would represent a significant increase over the current $1,099 starting price of the iPhone 17 Pro. If Apple wants to keep its upcoming iPhones competitive, it may need to accept lower profit margins.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      543
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      84
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      64
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!