Alex Smith or Colin Kaepernick


Alex Smith or Colin Kaepernick?  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should start for the San Francisco 49ers?

    • Alex Smith
    • Colin Kaepernick


Recommended Posts

So I'm curious where everyone else stands on this. Personally, I've never liked Smith. He's a good game manager, but I've always felt his arm lacking, and he plays it a bit safer than what I enjoy to watch. So who do you think should start? Alex Smith or Colin Kaepernick?

Oops wanted to add this link.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-am/0ap2000000105224/Should-49ers-go-back-to-Alex-Smith

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1123818-alex-smith-or-colin-kaepernick/
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter which one is on the field this Sunday. Cameron Wake is going to put whoever is under center on their backs. :D

154878952.0_standard_352.0.jpg

In seriousness. I would say Colin Kaepernick. The team has gotten where they are from good coaching, not Alex Smith, who has been horribly inconsistent over the years.

Go 'Phins!

Voted for Alex Smith, but there's a "but". It doesn't really matter one way or the other; they've both clearly got the capacity for being very good. Alex Smith is closer to it, and he's just started to come good on that in the last 2 seasons, and Kaep is showing the potential to do the same but isn't there yet.

The only mistake they could make is mixing and matching, I think they're far better off being decisive and committing to one QB for the season, whoever it is. I do feel kind of sorry for Alex Smith about the circumstances of how he's been benched, especially with how his last ~20 games have been. Hard to take.

Alex Smith has proved to be very good the last couple of years, but Kaepernick injects a vitality that Smith just does not have.

I would like to see Smith thrive in a good team. Maybe Vikings? A fourth pick (Plus Ponder as Kaep's backup) for Smith sounds reasonable.

  • 2 weeks later...

This is a completely different argument to Sanchez vs Tebow because neither of the 49ers QB's are bad. Alex Smith's QB rating is still really high and although people will argue that it's because he hasn't had as many opportunities to throw interceptions this season, he's still a solid QB. As people have already mentioned, the only reason that people are even asking who should start is because Kaepernick is proving himself to be the best of the rookie QB's. It's a tough one, but I think until Kaepernick has a bad game he should be starting.

This is a completely different argument to Sanchez vs Tebow because neither of the 49ers QB's are bad. Alex Smith's QB rating is still really high and although people will argue that it's because he hasn't had as many opportunities to throw interceptions this season, he's still a solid QB. As people have already mentioned, the only reason that people are even asking who should start is because Kaepernick is proving himself to be the best of the rookie QB's. It's a tough one, but I think until Kaepernick has a bad game he should be starting.

Kaepernick is not a rookie QB. He is in his 2nd year this year.

Kaepernick seems to always make the play he needs to make when it matters... Like he did against my Dolphin's last week. :(

At least Cam Wake put him on his back a couple times. 3 sacks if I recall. I called that one. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!