Thinking of getting an SSD. A little advice needed.


Recommended Posts

Hey,

I am thinking of upgrading the system hard drive in my laptop (a 2009 Dell Studio 17 (specifically a model 1737) with a 2.53Ghz Core 2 Duo T9400) from a 7200 RPM HDD to a 120-160 GB SSD and just wondered if doing so would be worthwhile in this system or not?

I don't really keep up with computer hardware these days so don't know if I will see a big improvement on this system or not. The SATA controller is SATA2 so which would be the best SSD to get if it will make a big improvement?

Just FYI this laptop has two HDD bays internally so I would replace disk 0 with the SSD and keep disk 1 as it is now (a 7200RPM HDD).

Thanks in advance for you input!

You'll definitely see a huge improvement even on SATA2, but I don't recommend on getting OCZ's older model of SSDs (I believe the current generation is fine) or any SSD that uses the old SandForce Controllers < SF-2xxx: http://www.neowin.ne...rtex-2-is-dead/

Yep, it will make a huge difference as your boot drive.

I'd recommend the OCZ Vertex 4, Samsung 830 or 840, or the Corsair M4. Those are all rock-solid and I'd say go with whichever one you can find the cheapest.

Don't waste your money on buying say a 500MBps or 600MBps SSD compared to a 300MBps one, because SATA II can't go faster than 300MBps, just a shopping tip. ;) (one of my recent mistakes)

And if you're planning on using the SSD as a boot drive (because you mentioned it has two drive bays), I recommend you get a 60GB SSD or more. I used a 30GB for my desktop, and it was not fun at all.

Thanks all. Sounds like I will upgrade then :D

Which models should I look at getting? I am in the UK if that makes any difference.

Any is fine as long as they are not using SandForce controllers prior to SF-2xxx because they're littered with issues that will render the SSD useless

Wikipedia page with a list of SandForce controllers: http://en.wikipedia..../SandForce#SSDs

**EDIT**

In case someone replies with, "mine is still working", it will die with a given time because some issues takes a while to kick in

**EDIT2**

Once you get your SSD MAKE SURE, I REPEAT, MAKE SURE you update the firmware to the latest version to eliminate any SSD issues. Many issues on SF-2xxx have been correct via firmware update but not those prior to it. As for non-SandForce controllers, I have no experince with them :rofl:

I will say got for it! But keep in mind how much space you actually need on the SSD, don't know for sure, but its definitely a good idea to keep a certain percentage of the SSD free. I made the mistake of buying a 120GB one and now I am always looking at the space I've used.

Me any my brother bought new laptops a few months ago, the only different between his and mine is that his has a 2GB nVidia GPU and mine has a 120GB SSD (with Intel HD) along with the i7 and 16GB RAM for both. His computer boots slower than me, programs open faster on mine, I had to use his laptop for a few hours and I gave up after 15 minutes, it was too slow. Its after you get the SSD you see what you've been missing. Go for it! And post your review here.

EDIT: Seems you will be keeping your older HDD as you have two slots for HDD, so you may not have to worry about space, like I do.

I have an Intel 80 GB drive from a couple years ago, and it runs great. I would get a bigger one though; but 120 GB should be more than big enough for your OS and Program Files, etc. Enjoy! You'll love booting into Windows in about 15 seconds or less!

It will be a very noticeable upgrade from a 7200 RPM drive.

I upgraded my mid-2009 MBP to an 80GB Intel SSD a little over a year ago and it felt like a whole new modern laptop. Boot up time is negligible and everything is so much snappier than before. I think that upgrading from a traditional hard drive to an SSD will probably yield the best performance increase and bang-for-your-buck than any other upgrade (if we are talking relatively modern computer system, and in your case we are).

Thanks everyone :)

CPU wise this machine is still fine for what I use it for (it is running Windows 8, Visual Studio 2012 and Office 2013 really smooth) so I don't really want to buy a whole new laptop just yet however I have been thinking of getting an SSD for a while as I keep reading how it is "like a whole new computer" etc. so I figure if it is gonna give me a performance boost on drive i/o then why not :D

Get an SSD but don't spend too long comparing performance. Anything you get will be a massive step up, just try to focus on reliability.

SSD speeds are a minefield at the moment. Most of the performance specs given by manufacturers relate only to a single specific benchmark test and don't reflect real world performance. That and they can slow down to half of their advertised speeds once they're over half full.

That being said, the difference between an SSD at advertised speeds and real world speeds is very negligable in terms of what you'll notice. We're talking half a second on loading screens and maybe a second or two at boot. General use of the computer will still feel incredibly snappy.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!