Can I get a old 2001 era notebook to connect to a WPA-PSK network?


Recommended Posts

My room mate still uses a old notebook for work, and it sucks having to drop down to WEP to allow him to connect each time. But it seems the notebook is so old It cannot connect to the network when I have WPA-PSK [TKIP] + WPA2-PSK [AES] enabled, even though Windows XP recognizes it. If not, I'll have to look into a dual band router.

Either way, I am not sitting in the middle of the city running WEP. No siree.

I'm sure it should be able to connect to a WPA2 network. What happens when he tries connecting to your network when you set security to WPA2 only? Does he get an error? I remember years ago when I had to install this optional update on my notebook running XP to connect to WPA2 my network: http://www.microsoft...ls.aspx?id=1974

Hello,

Would it be possible to install an 802.11n MiniPCI WWAN card in the notebook?

Another possibility might be to add a USB or CardBus 802.11n adapter to the notebook, if its internal WLAN cannot be upgraded to 802.11n.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Either way, I am not sitting in the middle of the city running WEP. No siree.

You're absolutely right :o

In the middle of a city with thousands of people wanting to connect "freely" to Wifi, using WEP is like saying "Here have some Wifi, just search Google for Wizard WEP based Tools and use my Net".

I would check every day my router logs if I were you.

Good luck!

My room mate still uses a old notebook for work, and it sucks having to drop down to WEP to allow him to connect each time. But it seems the notebook is so old It cannot connect to the network when I have WPA-PSK [TKIP] + WPA2-PSK [AES] enabled, even though Windows XP recognizes it. If not, I'll have to look into a dual band router.

Either way, I am not sitting in the middle of the city running WEP. No siree.

the simpleist way to solve this issue is for your friend to get him self a good usb wifi adapter wireless G type devices will support your routers setup.

make sure is a brand name like Netgear or edimx. if usb ports are an issue then im sure his laptop would have a PCMCIA card slot so again get a wireless G type card that will fit in the slot.

I've seen plenty of old laptops which the latest updates that Support WPA/WPA2 in XP but the hardware just can't connect to it even if it sees it. This is expected behaviour when it doesn't support it. The best hope of it connecting natively is WPA with TKIP, which is just as insecure as WEP (WPA with AES is secure enough). Best taking Aryeh's advice or even better yet, get a new laptop! That thing is old! time to let it go or just use a network cable instead.

have you tried WPA-Mixed with AES and PSK??

Yes, and it didn't work.

@All: I might just have to purchase a dual band router since the laptop is a company owned laptop. I was hoping there was something I was missing in XP that I could toggle on, but it seems that isn't the case. :(

Here's what I recommend, just get your roommate a new laptop. Like a 2011 Acer Aspire 5333. It works pretty good but it will work even better if you just get a disk for Windows 8 Pro. It works amazingly fast.

"The best hope of it connecting natively is WPA with TKIP, which is just as insecure as WEP"

That is PURE freaking FUD!!! Are there attacks against TKIP sure - but they are not the sort of attacks that allow access to the network. Sorry but WPA tkip is vastly more secure than just WEP.

XP with the right service pack will support WPA/WPA2 but your problem is most likely his hardware. What is the actual wireless card that is in the laptop? 2001 - you sure its not just a B card? 802.11g did not come out until 2003 if I recall correctly, so if his hardware is from 2001 -- I would have to expect its only 802.11b -- yeah good luck getting that to support WPA even tkip, even if the OS supports it, no good if hardware does not.

The suggestion of getting a usb or even pcmicia wifi card is the best bet. You can find them for <$10 for sure!

  • Like 3

"The best hope of it connecting natively is WPA with TKIP, which is just as insecure as WEP"

That is PURE freaking FUD!!! Are there attacks against TKIP sure - but they are not the sort of attacks that allow access to the network. Sorry but WPA tkip is vastly more secure than just WEP.

A quick Google search of "wpa tkip crack" provides plenty of off-the-shelf tools that any script kiddie can download and crack into your network in the search for free Wi-Fi when you are in a very built-up area and your network is the least secure of the lot. Sure it's going to take a little longer to wait until one of your devices re-connects to your Wi-Fi network for the passphrase packet to be intercepted, and then little bit longer to bruteforce the packet to get the key after that, but if someone who lives in range of your network wants to steal your internet, WPA+TKIP is not going to stop them.

get a miniusb wifi adapter. It should have the capability and driver support that you need to do what you want. you will need to have it support the os that is on that laptop.

This. Just make sure you disable or uninstall your Laptop's current wireless drivers first!

A quick Google search of "wpa tkip crack" provides plenty of off-the-shelf tools that any script kiddie can download and crack into your network in the search for free Wi-Fi when you are in a very built-up area and your network is the least secure of the lot. Sure it's going to take a little longer to wait until one of your devices re-connects to your Wi-Fi network for the passphrase packet to be intercepted, and then little bit longer to bruteforce the packet to get the key after that, but if someone who lives in range of your network wants to steal your internet, WPA+TKIP is not going to stop them.

To follow up on this, WPA2 is also equally secure or insecure, depending how you want to look at it. The problem being is although your packets are encrypted, they can be intercepted. If the data is intercepted and the scheme of the encryption is known (WEP/WPA/WPA2 schemes are basically public knowledge) its just a matter of intercepting enough packets to narrow down key possibilities. WPA2 will take LONGER to crack than WPA, which takes longer than WEP as WPA2 has a longer key so much more possibilities. WPA2 may something like a few million packets where WPA can be cracked on a few thousand logged packets, and WEP you can inject false packets as you please.

The moral of the story is WPA and up is more secure the less you use it, and less secure the more you use it.

"The best hope of it connecting natively is WPA with TKIP, which is just as insecure as WEP"

That is PURE freaking FUD!!! Are there attacks against TKIP sure - but they are not the sort of attacks that allow access to the network. Sorry but WPA tkip is vastly more secure than just WEP.

XP with the right service pack will support WPA/WPA2 but your problem is most likely his hardware. What is the actual wireless card that is in the laptop? 2001 - you sure its not just a B card? 802.11g did not come out until 2003 if I recall correctly, so if his hardware is from 2001 -- I would have to expect its only 802.11b -- yeah good luck getting that to support WPA even tkip, even if the OS supports it, no good if hardware does not.

The suggestion of getting a usb or even pcmicia wifi card is the best bet. You can find them for <$10 for sure!

Thank you, BudMan

"A quick Google search of "wpa tkip crack" provides plenty of off-the-shelf tools that any script kiddie can download and crack into your network"

This goes for WPA2 AES as well if you use P@55w0rd! as your PSK

Please show me attack other than bruteforce/dictionary PSK that allows you into tkip vs aes

Are you talking about the attack from 2008? Dude what part do you not understand about this attack??

"This is not a key recovery attack. TKIP keys are not compromised and it does not lead to decryption of all subsequent frames."

With WEP in like 30 seconds I can be ON YOU NETWORK!!! And watching ALL traffic, using your internet connection, run attacks against your other machines, etc. etc.. Sorry but there are no other attacks other then breaking the PSK that allow you do to this. Be it tkip or aes. So making a statement that tkip is akin to wep is just FUD pure and simple.

Yes any script kiddie can run these attacks, yes can download a simple script to get you on any WEP network in a matter of seconds. Where is this attack against tkip? Point them out, name them. If you would read any of the hits from your own google example you would see this.

Are you talking about grabbing the handshake, and doing a deauthenticate against a client to get the handshake - sure this can be done very quickly. And sure in a sense is easier than WEP.. Problem is with wep there is a limited key space, and I can crack that in seconds sure.

And if you used something like the above P@55w0rd! as your psk then sure your not very secure -- but if you use something like,

WR8c0VCk_+Y;nzgFd/z*WjX\w!y$$]u}

Good freaking luck using your dictionary, bruteforce or even rainbow tables on that. So again saying WPA tkip is as insecure as wep is just not true.

edit: just as a final note, Let me quote one of the guides from the actual makers of very popular crack tools guides on cracking wpa/wpa2 on their website. Now they don't distinguish between tkip or aes in this statement. If tkip wpa was as weak as wep like you say. I would think a site like this would clearly point that out, but what they do say is this

"if you want to have an unbreakable wireless network at home, use WPA/WPA2 and a 63 character password composed of random characters including special symbols."

Now should you use wpa2 aes, yes if your devices all support this - then by all means this is what you should be using with a SECURE PSK!! Or you still leave yourself open to something as simple as a dictionary attack.

BudMan is absolutely right on the post above, I would also agree that it's going to be a B card inside. I've had limited success in upgrading the WIFI card drivers inside (it might be worth a go) however a PCMCIA G card or USB card should cost almost nothing on ebay etc and that should fix the issue.

I apologise, yes it is a bruteforce attack to get the key (not as easy as a WEP attack), and there also one where a few rouge packets can be inserted here and there (not a full takeover), what I read about the TKIP attack is that it can purportedly be broken in 15 minutes using a Man in the Middle attack - but so far there are no freely available tools to do this.

Just make sure that you standard security protocol to have a very long password with uppercase, lowercase and special characters and no dictionary words, and it will take forever to crack even with WPA TKIP.

Still, many Wireless cards of this era support WPA-TKIP, not just WEP, but not WPA-AES or WPA2, so WPA-TKIP is worth a go with a long password, otherwise use an ethernet cable or get a new laptop (It is a waste of money to buy a new PCI/USB Wireless card, as this money could be going towards a new laptop).

"many Wireless cards of this era support WPA-TKIP,"

How is that, when his card was made in 2001, and WPA (sometimes referred to as the draft IEEE 802.11i standard) became available in 2003

While I somewhat agree, money could be spent on a newer machine. You can pick up a wireless card for less than $10. There are 12 devices under that price here http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100010074%204024&IsNodeId=1&name=%240%20-%20%2410

I would think the cost of a Beer at the airport is worth the hassle of switching between wep and wpa, etc.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!