Can I get a old 2001 era notebook to connect to a WPA-PSK network?


Recommended Posts

There are also wifi to ethernet adapters, its a small little box that can be powered from usb.

such as http://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-WNCE2001-Universal-Internet-Adapter/dp/B003KPBRRW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1355748672&sr=8-1&keywords=wifi+to+ethernet+converter but there are cheaper ones from HAMA and other companies out there.

Haven't read your thread but just the first post, WPA PSK is no more secure than WEP.

I tested out my own router with reaver, it is WPA2-PSK and reaver cracked the password in 1 hour 50 minutes by bruteforcing the routers pin.

just wanted to put that out there.

sorry just ignore me, looks like this has already been covered lol

Haven't read your thread but just the first post, WPA PSK is no more secure than WEP.

I tested out my own router with reaver, it is WPA2-PSK and reaver cracked the password in 1 hour 50 minutes.

just wanted to put that out there.

sorry just ignore me, looks like this has already been covered lol

It's been covered and just because you can brute force a password doesn't make it less secure. You need to revisit your password strength. Wep transmits the pass in clear text wpa does not.

Try this for a pass and let me know how long it takes

Poopbabyyum

3 simple words that are easy to remember creating a long password that doesn't exist in any single word dictionary.

It's been covered and just because you can brute force a password doesn't make it less secure. You need to revisit your password strength. Wep transmits the pass in clear text wpa does not.

Try this for a pass and let me know how long it takes

Poopbabyyum

3 simple words that are easy to remember creating a long password that doesn't exist in any single word dictionary.

reaver doesn't use a dictionary, it cracks a vulnerability in PSK pins and gains the pass that way.

Reaver implements a brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup (WPS) registrar PINs in order to recover WPA/WPA2 passphrases, as described in http://sviehb.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/viehboeck_wps.pdf.

ill try that tonight though when dad goes to bed and let you know.

WPS has been a known issue for quite some time, anyone still running it deserves to be hacked.. You can not live under a rock and expect to be secure, I know its a lot to ask for typical users.

But if you want to use technology - you need to learn some of the basics, how to keep it updated for starters.

You might not know how to rebuild your cars transmission, but you know that you need to get the oil changed, and buy new tires when the thread gets low. You know that you have to put gas in now and then right. Same goes for your wireless router - you need to check for security issues know and then. Are there updates, are there any issues with the security protocol you picked to secure it. A quick google or simple question on a board like this will get you the answers you need, etc.

will have to play with reaver..but I don't leave WPS on. You would need to have a wap with wps enabled for that to work.

yeah it must be PSK otherwise reaver wont crack it.

I dont know much about it really but something about PSK means it has the PINs that reaver guesses

what I do for secuirty is turn on the whitelist feature in my router, only my desktop, laptop and dads laptop are whitelisted. that way, even someone with the pass cant connect to our network

Wps is flawed.

Wpa-psk is not. They are two different technologies. The hole in wps gives that tool an in. Disable wps and suddenly that tool doesn't work to get in.

Know how to secure your network any you won't have to setup what computers can and can't have access which in itself isn't security if doing it by MAC address.

I'm sure it should be able to connect to a WPA2 network. What happens when he tries connecting to your network when you set security to WPA2 only? Does he get an error? I remember years ago when I had to install this optional update on my notebook running XP to connect to WPA2 my network: http://www.microsoft...ls.aspx?id=1974

The issue tends to be the built-in adapter - not the notebook or laptop itself.

My mom has a far older Gateway Solo 600 that originally came with - don't faint - Windows 2000 Professional, but was upgraded with Windows XP (which it still runs today) - the issue was the built-in wireless adapter only supported WEP (even with updated XP drivers). Adding a PC Card-based wireless adapter (with WPA2 support) solved the issue. (There are both PC Card and USB-based wireless adapters - even ones that support dual-band 802.11n - for these older warhorses still available. both new and refurbished.)

Here's a wireless-G adapter for that era of laptop: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833156140.

How is that, when his card was made in 2001, and WPA (sometimes referred to as the draft IEEE 802.11i standard) became available in 2003

It is a long time ago, but I do remember that some cards worked with driver/OS updates like the legendary ORINOCO Gold Card with was rebranded into dozens of other cards as well.

If you have a PMCIA card slot, Belkin have produced Wireless G and N MIMO cards that you can still find driver support for WPA/WPA2 on Windows XP SP3, Vista and Windows 7 x86. Range isn't fantastic but they are a good stop gap until you get new hardware. I got two Draft N MIMO cards for ?15 each 18months ago (one of which is still in service on a Centrino laptop).

I'm with everyone else, I'd just encourage him to get a decent wifi card rather than leaving your network unsecure.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!