Is there a stable way to look for graphics cards?


Recommended Posts

So, my EAH5670 just isn't cutting it anymore. I've been looking for a new card for the past two months or so, but I can't seem to bet myself to decide on one, and even when I do, I'm not sure. What are some tips to look for a graphics card? Is there some guide out there? I know that it's recommended to buy cards just by looking at specs, it's mostly about benchmarks, but I can't seem to find some relevant benchmarks online. Not only that, I don't want it for just gaming. I do lots of high resolution Photoshop work along with HD video editing, but I also want to play games like Assassin's Creed III on the highest settings on a card that won't dip under 30 frames.

I was wondering if such a card exists that's in the $100-$150 range. Should I spend more? I would love some examples, but more than anything, I would love a sort of guide on how to properly search for cards. Thanks!

Nvidia Geforece 560Ti's can be had for around the that price range and would do fine for a good bit of games...

now I got a GF 650Ti for 169USD and It's a pretty nice card for the money. I can max skyrim out 1080p and the frame rates are good.

Oh! I also forgot to mention that I'm planning a tripple monitor build (NOT for gaming, I will only be using one monitor for gaming). So I want a card that can support three monitors, is that helps out. I'll be checking out the GF 650Ti as you recommended. :)

ASUS HD 7970 DirectCU II: coolest and quietest 28nm card

?Cranked 75MHz over reference for an ultimate engine clock of 1000MHz

?All new DirectCU thermal design utilizes six all-copper heatpipes and 20% bigger dissipation area, achieving 20% cooler and 14dB quieter performance than reference

?Acclaimed DIGI+ VRM with 12-phase Super Alloy Power technology delivers precise digital power and enhanced durability for stable overclocking

?VGA Hotwire allows you to plug and solder wires on the card?s voltage regulators and accurately read and control Vcore, Vmem, and PLL voltages on a hardware level

?GPU Tweak utility helps you modify and tune clock speeds, voltages, and fan performance via an intuitive interface

?One card drives up to six screens with AMD Eyefinity? 6

ASUS HD 7970 DirectCU II: coolest and quietest 28nm card

?Cranked 75MHz over reference for an ultimate engine clock of 1000MHz

?All new DirectCU thermal design utilizes six all-copper heatpipes and 20% bigger dissipation area, achieving 20% cooler and 14dB quieter performance than reference

?Acclaimed DIGI+ VRM with 12-phase Super Alloy Power technology delivers precise digital power and enhanced durability for stable overclocking

?VGA Hotwire allows you to plug and solder wires on the card?s voltage regulators and accurately read and control Vcore, Vmem, and PLL voltages on a hardware level

?GPU Tweak utility helps you modify and tune clock speeds, voltages, and fan performance via an intuitive interface

?One card drives up to six screens with AMD Eyefinity? 6

It's also 3 times his stated budget.

OP: I can't find a good comparison of cards benchmarked on ACIII, but here's a chart at Anandtech for Batman: Arkham City @ 1920x1200 and Extreme quality settings. This is a pretty graphically demanding DirectX 11 game, so it should give an idea of relative performance for current/upcoming games.

You can get a GTX 560 Ti or 650 Ti (bonus: the 650 Ti's are coming with a free copy of ACIII) in your price range which would give you around 50 FPS in Batman @ the above settings.

To drive 3 monitors though, you'll need either an AMD card or an nVidia 600 series card (like the 650 Ti). nVidia's 500 series cards only support 2 monitors from 1 card (excepting some unique configurations that their AIBs designed).

So, my EAH5670 just isn't cutting it anymore. I've been looking for a new card for the past two months or so, but I can't seem to bet myself to decide on one, and even when I do, I'm not sure. What are some tips to look for a graphics card? Is there some guide out there? I know that it's recommended to buy cards just by looking at specs, it's mostly about benchmarks, but I can't seem to find some relevant benchmarks online. Not only that, I don't want it for just gaming. I do lots of high resolution Photoshop work along with HD video editing, but I also want to play games like Assassin's Creed III on the highest settings on a card that won't dip under 30 frames.

I was wondering if such a card exists that's in the $100-$150 range. Should I spend more? I would love some examples, but more than anything, I would love a sort of guide on how to properly search for cards. Thanks!

Pretty much this is what I say to my friends when they look for a video card when I'm not not available, "just go to YouTube and search up the video card that interest you, and if you like what you see in the video then buy it" :rofl:

Example, for the GTX 660 Ti, you see different kind of games being played with it (along with different setups so FPS will vary) and if you like what you see then buy it :laugh: . As for what you SHOULD look for they are

Video RAM: If you're planning on playing at 1080p then you need a minimum of 1GB, preferably ~1.5GB, but current generation of video cards comes with ~2-4-GB which is nice. Also, new games that supports "ultra high" textures requires more than 1GB of video RAM, such as Skyrim's High Definition add-on, Battlefield 3 on ultra high, and Alien vs. Predator 2010 (last I played, AvP was using ~1.7GB :o ). Another thing, you probably want 1GB or more since you work with PhotoShop and HD videos.

Memory Interface Width: This one is tough to say since it varies across GDDR3, GDDR4, and GDDR5, but generally it goes something like this (for the sake of simplicity):

128-bit and below: Low end

192-bit: Mid range

192-bit+ (256-bit+? :rofl:): High end

As for the rest of the video card, it's best to do a benchmark since it's not easy to say what's good and what's bad just from reading the specifications unless you have years of experience, such as memory and core clock; therefore, you can give take a look at AnandTech's GPU benchmark

I hope that helps

  • Like 1

You're struggling with that budget, I would recommend a 660Ti at least but it's probably almost twice your budget.

Stick with Nvidia, they have a feature built into the Keplar (600 range) cards called CUDA which is GPU processing, it's great for Photoshop and the like, although obviously it won't be as good as having a dedicated workstation card like a Quadro.

You're struggling with that budget, I would recommend a 660Ti at least but it's probably almost twice your budget.

Stick with Nvidia, they have a feature built into the Keplar (600 range) cards called CUDA which is GPU processing, it's great for Photoshop and the like, although obviously it won't be as good as having a dedicated workstation card like a Quadro.

CUDA also helps in processing videos but that's if the program you're using supports CUDA (even PhotoShop) :)

Thank you guys all so much, especially AimLXJ! The memory interface information helps a lot. I want something that's a little more than 1GB of RAM to handle larger resolutions with multiple screens. As for workstation cards, that would be idea for the video and photo editing alone, but not so much for gaming. All of this information is relevant. Thanks guys! For those who might be curious of my system specs, take a look here. I would appreciate as much help as I can get. :)

http://i.imgur.com/DYKwZ.png

I have a 575 Watt PSU. I have an internal terabyte drive I plan on disconnecting (I only use it for backups). My current card runs on power from the motherboard alone.

I'm currently looking at these two.

http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814125444

http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814121642

Is the extra $25 worth it for the Radeon (with the MIR)? It also might be worthy to mention that I'm going to purchase a new card near January. I'm just trying to educate myself on how to make a solid purchase on my own. These cares are nearly just for comparison purposes.

CUDA also helps in processing videos but that's if the program you're using supports CUDA (even PhotoShop) :)
AMD graphics cards support OpenCL which is pretty much replacing CUDA nowadays. For instance Photoshop CS6 uses OpenCL instead of CUDA. OpenCL is supported by all graphics cards and is an open standard whereas CUDA is a proprietary NVIDIA system.

Just out of curiosity, would this version of the above card be compatible with my Mobo? I'm unfamiliar with the different PCI x16 specs.

Mobo: http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c02560084&lc=en&cc=ca&dlc=en&product=5061012#N448

Card: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814500271

My comp has a 300W PSU.

I'm drooling at the thought of quad-monitor support but realize that I'm limited sometimes because I only buy factory. Between lack of time and the inability to apply thermal paste, I've always just went with OEM. I frankly only like the card because it has dual HDMI too.

Even if that card isn't compatible/isn't a good brand/is too much for what I need, anything else that would support a three or four monitor setup?

Just out of curiosity, would this version of the above card be compatible with my Mobo? I'm unfamiliar with the different PCI x16 specs.

Mobo: http://h10025.www1.h...ct=5061012#N448

Card: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814500271

My comp has a 300W PSU.

I'm drooling at the thought of quad-monitor support but realize that I'm limited sometimes because I only buy factory. Between lack of time and the inability to apply thermal paste, I've always just went with OEM. I frankly only like the card because it has dual HDMI too.

Even if that card isn't compatible/isn't a good brand/is too much for what I need, anything else that would support a three or four monitor setup?

This motherboard and card will work. The motherboard supports PCIx16 2, but the PCI 3 card should work fine (correct me if I'm wrong). You might want to look into upgrading your PSU though, 300 is pretty low for peripheral hardware, especially if you're running the usual hardware (Hard drive, optical disk drive, case power, etc)

I have a 120GB SSD, 1.5TB HDD, two DVD burners, and a Radeon HD 6450 card. Is 500W good?

To my stupidity, I also just realized that none of my monitors have HDMI, thus there's no reason for a dual HDMI card.

I should just start my own topic :(

it would be "just enough"

I got a 620w and no optical drives, no sound card (onboard on mobo), i5 3570K, GF650ti, 128GB Samsung 840 SSD, 1.5TB Seagate SATA drive, and 16GB Corsair XMS 3 DDR 3 1600 RAM Coolermaster Hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!