Recommended Posts

One of my customers is having us setup an Exchange 2013 cluster with Windows Server 2012, but they want us to use a DMZ Network on their firewall.

Because the server roles have changed, and Exchange will need Active Directory services, we're wondering if the best case scenario to meet there security expectations is to create a Virtual machine with Exchange 2010 transport roles in the DMZ.

Will this setup/configuration work or is this not recommended?

Will any ports have to be opened for the 2010 transport server to communicate with active directory?

depending on how the dmz is setup, you will need ports 25 (for mail in and out), 50389 and 50636 (these two ports are for secure active directory) and if you want to manage with rdp 3389. You will be fine with putting this in a vm server.

depending on how the dmz is setup, you will need ports 25 (for mail in and out), 50389 and 50636 (these two ports are for secure active directory) and if you want to manage with rdp 3389. You will be fine with putting this in a vm server.

Thanks dude.... now is the Transport Server what we need to make this work with the DMZ? I'm installing Hyper V/Server 2k8 with Exchange 2k10 as we speak.....

What we want is to place the edge transport server in the DMZ with the least amount of open ports to meet the company's network security policies.

Can this server be a standalone server that is not a member of the domain with it's only purpose is to be a transport server?

Would you be wanting an edge transport server role then? Your wanting to simply have something in the DMZ to accept traffic on port 25 and perform simple spam/security checks which isn't AD reliant?

I think you maybe confusing Edge transport (not AD reliant and made for DMZ) with hub transport (AD Reliant, needs to be 'inside')?

Exchange 2010 Edge Transport

Edge Transport is an optional role that can be installed to prevent spam and virus. This role is meant to replace spam filtering devices such as Barracuda Spam firewall and Symantec mail security. This role is installed on a stand-alone server (workgroup) and uses ADAM to sync LDAP data from Active directory. This allows recipient filtering on Edge Transport server.

What we want is to place the edge transport server in the DMZ with the least amount of open ports to meet the company's network security policies.

Can this server be a standalone server that is not a member of the domain with it's only purpose is to be a transport server?

Sorry for my earlier posts, juts seen this of yours where you clearly state you want to put the Edge transport role in the DMZ.

You'll need to configure ADAM (Active Directory Application Mode) so that the edge transport server (workgroup not domain member) can 'talk' to AD and filter recipients correctly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I don’t get why if I bought the game on the last get I needed to pay $40 to upgrade to the new version in the first place and people who love the game and play a lot would have upgraded already so this is just PR and a chance to grab new players who forgot the game long time ago I think
    • The term "use" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that headline. "Use" can mean opening ChatGPT occasionally to ask for the definition of a word or information about a specific topic. If you frame the question around how many people use it as a daily driver in their work or personal lives, that number is a lot smaller. Those are the people who pay for AI. Nearly everyone else is happy to use it for free, but doesn't see enough value in it to pay for it.
    • No support for Windows Hello!
    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      67
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!