• 0

Bought Lenovo laptop - what pre-installed software isn't required.


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I also always do a fresh install, but like xorangekiller said, you'll want to leave the majority of the Lenovo utilities. They are actually well built and provide a lot of needed functions for the machine.

For instance, the Fingerprint software allows your FP reader to work and support both logging into Windows and powering on the computer from a single swipe at a full power off state. The power utility does stuff such as completely powers off your DVD-RW drive when not in use. There are a lot of useful functions done by these utilities. The only ones I don't have installed are AccessConnections, Auto Scroll Utility, and Lenovo Solution Center.

  • 0

I can find the drivers for thing like sound & display etc

Couldn't find where to download the programs such as the ones you mention LogicalApex.

Then there's the problem i just mentioned - the .iso wont burn to DVD+R.

  • 0

I can find the drivers for thing like sound & display etc

Couldn't find where to download the programs such as the ones you mention LogicalApex.

Then there's the problem i just mentioned - the .iso wont burn to DVD+R.

Have a look in C:\ for folders called 'setup' - I know HP drivers are all stored there

Also if you have a recovery partition they could be sitting on that

  • 0

Java - seriously? What about when you open websites & it states "you must have Java installed to view this site"? How do you get around it?

The rule of thumb with java is unless you KNOW you require it, take it off. Java is a MAJOR infection vector. Judging from that photo you even have an out of date version of it, which is the WORST case scenario. The newest version is 7 version 10. So if you know you don't need java I would HIGHLY recommend you remove it.

  • 0

Regards Java - i installed it direct from the Java website. Has it only recently been updated (& by recently i mean past few days)? As like i say, i downloaded it direct from the Java website within the past week or so, so i would assume the main website would have the most up to date version...??

Also, i've tried viewing websites in the past & get told i can't view them as i require Java, so i need it it seems.

I'd like to burn that .iso - anyone any idea why it wont burn to DVD?

  • 0

As has been suggested already, any Lenovo owner should keep a copy of Lenovo System Update (easily found from your favorite search engine) handy at all times. Similar to WU, it sorts by priority, so you can avoid pure 'utilities' if you wish. It's a great all-in-one that will keep your drivers up-to-date, fill in OEM-specific gaps WU doesn't, and will even keep you on top of the latest firmware images.

I'm on my third Lenovo, and what I do is practically rote. After putting the System Update (and wifi drivers, to be safe) on a flash drive:

1) Create a recovery image.

2) Wipe and clean install Windows.

3) Make sure my network works--install drivers if necessary

4) Install and run LSU.

Windows Update might be in there somewhere, too. It polls for updates as soon as a connection is detected. I wouldn't recommend running both update tools at the same time, so it's probably best to go through the WU process before the LSU one.

It's a shame you don't seem interested in Windows 8, since its ability to wipe clean without the need to format or re-configure anything is so dramatically far ahead of anything Windows 7 can possibly be made capable of. Alas, too many people have convinced themselves that the desktop was 'abandoned' in Windows 8, and therefore has no added functionality over Windows 7. Their loss, I guess.

  • 0

My advice as many before me have given, wipe and install a fresh OS, that's what I always do.

But the problem is - How do i do a clean install when they didn't provide a Win7 disc (& i'm not interested in Windows 8 before anyone mentions it).

You can Google to find original digital river download links for Windows 7, you can then use the Windows 7 boot-able USB maker to make a boot-able USB and install Windows again.

  • 0

It's a shame you don't seem interested in Windows 8, since its ability to wipe clean without the need to format or re-configure anything is so dramatically far ahead of anything Windows 7 can possibly be made capable of. Alas, too many people have convinced themselves that the desktop was 'abandoned' in Windows 8, and therefore has no added functionality over Windows 7. Their loss, I guess.

Windows 8 has its advantages, but not enough to overcome my gripes with it. That is for another thread though ;)

I wiped Windows 8 from my T530 and put Windows 7 on it pretty quickly. But, to each his own. This is why we have choice :)

  • 0

Should i make a separate thread regarding burning the .iso to DVD then? I've asked a few times but nobody seems to know.

KILL JAVA! KILL IT WITH FIRE!

Without coming out with such a statement - what do you do when you go on websites that require Java?
  • 0

Should i make a separate thread regarding burning the .iso to DVD then? I've asked a few times but nobody seems to know.

Depends on what the error is. You can use ImgBurn to burn it like I do for any of my optical discs, but without the specific error no idea why it won't do it. As Windows built in burner can definitely do .ISO burns.

  • 0

For those of you saying do a clean install -

would any of you install ANY of the Lenovo software shown in post #1, or would you ONLY install the drivers for the hardware & leave it at that?

I will download and install the "On Screen Display". It helps show graphics when volume is turned up/down, track pad enabled/disabled, etc. I like that it shows whats been done, and its not that heavy on system resources.

I downloaded the .iso linked

Just tried burning it to DVD & got the attached error message. Any idea why?

post-37542-0-93603800-1355855664.jpg

Use this offical MS software to make a boot-able USB/CD Windows 7 USB/DVD download tool

  • 0

Depends on what the error is. You can use ImgBurn to burn it like I do for any of my optical discs, but without the specific error no idea why it won't do it. As Windows built in burner can definitely do .ISO burns.

I'm confused - i posted a screenshot of the error, but you're asking what the error is..??

WawasTariq - thanks.

  • 0

I'm confused - i posted a screenshot of the error, but you're asking what the error is..??

WawasTariq - thanks.

Yea I didn't notice the screenshot, but I'm at work so I'm also half reading the thread. But use ImgBurn imho as that MS error means little to most of us.

  • 0

Hang on a second.....

The last time i did something like this was in the days of WinXP when OEM & retail were a factor, but somewhere in this thread it says that no longer happens.

I have a Win7 Pro 32bit & 64bit DVD i used to install Win7 on my PC - key is locked to my PC.

Could i just use this very DVD to do a clean install?? And use the key on the laptop with the DVD? Instead of struggling with this .iso not burning?

  • 0

Hang on a second.....

The last time i did something like this was in the days of WinXP when OEM & retail were a factor, but somewhere in this thread it says that no longer happens.

I have a Win7 Pro 32bit & 64bit DVD i used to install Win7 on my PC - key is locked to my PC.

Could i just use this very DVD to do a clean install?? And use the key on the laptop with the DVD? Instead of struggling with this .iso not burning?

The "retail" version will accept the OEM key (I cant remember the story on activating it as there was that whole OEM activation hack hoopla around the launch of Windows 7) just fine...

That being said, you want to be sure you have the recovery image burned in case it all falls apart you have a stable rock to stand on. So don't do anything drastic without that media created.

  • 0

Yeah i've just created the recovery CD & DVDs & tested them out - they worked - they put the laptop back to its original state.

Just a bit of a lightbulb moment - i remember that being said about the keys a few posts back & it didn't hit me at the time that i could probably use my current WinXP Pro DVD.

  • 0

Yeah i've just created the recovery CD & DVDs & tested them out - they worked - they put the laptop back to its original state.

Just a bit of a lightbulb moment - i remember that being said about the keys a few posts back & it didn't hit me at the time that i could probably use my current WinXP Pro DVD.

XP? Don't go back that far. I'd recommend stopping as far back as 7 really.

  • 0

I've done a clean install & am in the process of putting everything back on (well, the stuff i want anyway).

When i did a clean install, i had the option of deleting the partition which holds the Lenovo recovery. It's about 15GB i think (laptop is turned off, so i'm guessing) & the total capacity of the HDD is 500GB.

I didn't know whether it'd be safe to delete this partition or not, so i left it. This post is just me asking whether you guys would now delete this?

Just to note: I've made the recovery CDs & DVDs & tested them out - they work. I also noticed there's an option to instead of making 3 recovery DVDs, putting the data to a USB memory stick - so i've ordered a 16GB one to do this with as i guess it'd be quicker. I don't know if i'd be able to do this though if i was to fully delete that partition.

  • 0

The recovery partition is usually literally for that, for recovering your computer back to the original state. - Pretty much the same as the disc you've created.

Keep it if you want the option to restore from that partition, if you want to restore from your dvd recovery disc then you may remove it.

(I'd remove it personally for the extra 15gb if it were me)

  • 0

I agree with ashpowell. I ALWAYS remove the OEM recovery partition when I format a computer. So long as you have an installation disc available that you can use to reinstall your OS if necessary, its redundant at best. I never even bother creating the recovery discs as you did, but I suppose that it doesn't hurt to have a backup.

If the partition is at the beginning of your hard disk, like most OEM recovery partitions I've seen, its probably a bad idea to boot into GParted (or another partitioning program) to remove it and expand your primary partition at this point unless you are prepared to reinstall Windows again. Windows will often place the bootloader on the first usable partition on the disk, which is usually the recovery partition when it exists. If you delete the partition, the bootsector won't be able to find the bootloader, which then, obviously, can't boot Windows. Even if the bootloader is on your primary Windows partition, you will still prevent the bootsector from finding the bootloader if you expand the primary partition into the free space at the beginning of the disk created by deleting the recovery partition. It is possible to reinstall the bootsector/bootloader using your Windows installation disc after such an operation, but its tricky (and, honestly, probably beyond your skill level at the moment).

  • 0

I would boot from a GParted Live disc, use GParted to delete the recovery partition and expand the primary partition into the free space, and use bootsect from my Windows 7 installation disc to reinstall the bootsector. In most cases, though, it would probably be easier to just reinstall Windows and repartition from the Windows installer.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      228
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      161
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!