• 0

[C#] Am I missing a pitfall with base64 encode sending?


Question

I am always learning different parts of the C# language b/c lets face it, it's a lot of fun :). I've decided to configure my wcf service as a rest service which supports json request/response instead of xml. All has gone well and I can serialize/deserialize my messages into complex classes so far, unless I send a bunch of data in them. I've tried to change my readerQuotas, etc, etc but everytime I try to make a call it says "Error: Bad Data". I know the service works because I can call simple functions and pass data to/from the service. But if I pass a class with 3 byte[] properties each 128 bytes in length it fails. If I pass the same class with each byte[] param with 3 bytes of data it goes through (I base64 encode each complex class after serializing them). Here is my example code:

This example passes and goes through:

GetTestSalesRequest req = new GetTestSalesRequest()
			{
				CurrentTest = new byte[] { 1 },
				CurrentMTest = new byte[] { 4 },
				UserName = this.gl_userName,// <---- is a string
				UserPwd = new byte[] { 2 }
			};

string test = await this.gl_client2.TestFunc(req);
			System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Test function: {0}", test);

This example fails.


GetTestSalesRequest req = new GetTestSalesRequest()
			{
				CurrentTest = CryptographicEngine.Encrypt(keySvr, Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(test1.ToString()).AsBuffer(), null).ToArray(), // <---- is a byte[]
				CurrentMTest = CryptographicEngine.Encrypt(keySvr, Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(test2.ToString()).AsBuffer(), null).ToArray(), //<---- is a  byte[]
				UserName = this.gl_userName,// <---- is a string
				UserPwd = this.gl_userPwd // <--- is a byte[]
			};

string test = await this.gl_client2.TestFunc(req);
			System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Test function: {0}", test);


public async Task<string> TestFunc(GetTestSalesRequest request)
		{

string resBody = null;
			byte[] testStr = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(WebHelperClass.SerializeJSONObj<GetTestSalesRequest>(request));
			string addr = string.Format("{0}/TestFunc/{1}", this.gl_baseAddr, Convert.ToBase64String(testStr));
			WebRequest req = WebRequest.Create(addr);
			HttpWebResponse res = await req.GetResponseAsync() as HttpWebResponse;
			if (res.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.OK)
			{
				using (Stream stream = res.GetResponseStream())
				{
					using (StreamReader sr = new StreamReader(stream))
					{
						resBody = sr.ReadToEnd();
						sr.Dispose();
					}
				}
			}
			return resBody;
}

Is there a pitfall I'm going into here? What am I missing that is really obvious because this has to be possible to be done.

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Not really strong with debugging other peoples code.. But.. have you tried:

1) Sending the same data but un-encrypted

2) Using AsciiEncoding.Ascii instead of Encoding.UTF8 for the base64 encode?

3) It looks like you are just using the CryptographicEngine, that won't base64 it, have you tried just a plain-jane base64 encode?

4) You pass in a few variables, are you sure they are all initialized correctly?

  • 0

Well basically I'm just taking the json string (that was created by serializing the complex class) in TestFunc and base64 encoding it to send it across to the rest service so I don't have a long query string similar to /TestFunc/{[80,10,01,01,30,10,10], "test":"etc"}. So I am base64 encoding the whole thing then decoding it on the rest service side. If I send the class with only have small amounts of byte data it goes through just fine. If I send each byte[] with having 128 different indexes each then it fails. Ingramator which files do you want? The debugger just outputs saying "The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request."

System.Net.WebException was unhandled by user code

HResult=-2146233079

Message=The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request.

Source=System

StackTrace:

at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.EndGetResponse(IAsyncResult asyncResult)

at System.Threading.Tasks.TaskFactory`1.FromAsyncCoreLogic(IAsyncResult iar, Func`2 endFunction, Action`1 endAction, Task`1 promise, Boolean requiresSynchronization)

--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---

at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)

at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)

at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter`1.GetResult()

at TestSaleStoreApp.TestSaleRestSvcClient.<TestFunc>d__a.MoveNext() in c:\Users\User\Documents\Visual Studio 2012\Projects\TestSaleStoreApp\TestSaleStoreApp\TestSaleRestSvcClient.cs:line 50

--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---

at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)

at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)

at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter`1.GetResult()

at TestSaleStoreApp.MainUserPg.<initSettings>d__16.MoveNext() in c:\Users\User\Documents\Visual Studio 2012\Projects\TestSaleStoreApp\TestSaleStoreApp\MainUserPg.xaml.cs:line 524

InnerException:

If you need more info let me know :) I'm stumped on this one. As for the ASCII I haven't tried that yet I'll look into it later today but I'm suspecting it has to do with the length of the content (which I've changed the readerQuota settings).

I also really appreciate the help so far guys!

  • 0

It's quite possible you're just sending too much data via the query string, why aren't you just sending it as the request body instead?

base64 makes the content larger, and you don't need to do it with text (like JSON).

  • 0

@The_Decryptor b/c I'm new to using Rest services I'm used to using SOAP :) I'll look into that thanks.

EDIT: My url looks like this:

localhost:8733/Design_Time_Addresses/TestSaleRestSvc/Service1/TestFunc/eyJDdXJyZW50Q29vcmRzTGF0IjpbMiwzLDRdLCJDdXJyZW50Q29vcmRzTG9uZyI6WzMsNCw1XSwiVXNlck5hbWUiOiJyeWFuIiwiVXNlclB3ZCI6WzFdfQ==&pwdKey=Aw==&latKey=JbU2hfwNBi1vHZxH5OnUcKabsT1kx16jqn3BAxLDXPTCHbyIlDyPOoK0NNQVSLmaOD5x1bjzipTM9VJOaQgTIgjmqNtX+l9Jq2EeetSQI58RhCwUFRQGOpKaLEJ03JeZ5UjD3rTzm2HFr5P0SvQBYBsgLB9W1je3PPoD28Ro7IU=&longKey=AQ=="]localhost:8733/Design_Time_Addresses/TestSaleRestSvc/Service1/TestFunc/eyJDdXJyZW50Q29vcmRzTGF0IjpbMiwzLDRdLCJDdXJyZW50Q29vcmRzTG9uZyI6WzMsNCw1XSwiVXNlck5hbWUiOiJyeWFuIiwiVXNlclB3ZCI6WzFdfQ==&pwdKey=Aw==&latKey=JbU2hfwNBi1vHZxH5OnUcKabsT1kx16jqn3BAxLDXPTCHbyIlDyPOoK0NNQVSLmaOD5x1bjzipTM9VJOaQgTIgjmqNtX+l9Jq2EeetSQI58RhCwUFRQGOpKaLEJ03JeZ5UjD3rTzm2HFr5P0SvQBYBsgLB9W1je3PPoD28Ro7IU=&longKey=AQ==

  • 0

Hmm it's always to debug without having it in front of you but I can try and point you in the right direction! :) If its working with smaller data samples it may be that you're [trying to encode an unsupported data type]/[base64 doesn't know what to encode so its sending invalid data] but I can't tell from the log there. The most common problem I find is that the data buffer is not being completely filled or filled correctly so I'd investigate that first! Enable tracing first, instructions here http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms733025.aspx :p then test and it will show you exactly where the problem is occurring. Hope this helps, good luck with the project mate!

  • 0

So I want to take this time to thank everyone who helped me. You guys are all great assets to this community and I hope I can give back one day by finding other questions I can answer in this forum and post my 2 cents on the subject (you guys are just too quick it seems most of the time and say what I would say :) ). +1 to you all and I hope you have a good holiday.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Still 93% off: Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2026 lifetime digital license by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for a limited time you can still save 93% on Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2026. Code Faster, Work Smarter with Visual Studio 2026 Visual Studio Professional 2026 is a fully featured development environment that developers around the world know & love — now enhanced with deeper AI integration, improved performance & more powerful collaboration tools. Built as a 64-bit IDE, it makes it easier than ever to work with very large solutions & complex workloads. Boost your productivity, write high-quality code & re-imagine team collaboration with an advanced suite of tools & built-in integrations designed to tackle the most demanding development workflows & deliver modern, cloud-connected applications. Build across languages and platforms Craft cross-platform mobile & desktop apps with .NET MAUI Build responsive Web UIs in C# with Blazor Build, debug, & test .NET & C++ apps targeting Windows, Linux & containers Use hot reload capabilities across .NET & C++ apps to apply code changes instantly Edit running ASP.NET/ASP.NET Core pages in the web designer view Integrate seamlessly with Azure, GitHub & other DevOps workflows Type less, code more with Intellicode and AI Understand your code context: variable names, functions, libraries & the type of code you’re writing Complete a line or block of code based on patterns learned from your codebase Get a ranked list of next best suggestions, helping you code more rapidly & accurately Use built-in AI-assisted refactoring & code suggestions to reduce bugs & boilerplate Gain deep insights into your code with codelens Reveal crucial information such as recent changes, authors, tests & commit history directly in the editor See test status & references without leaving your code Make informed decisions with a comprehensive overview of your codebase and activity Collaborate seamlessly with live share Run real-time collaboration sessions with teammates — no need for them to clone repos or install all dependencies Speed up your team’s edit & debugging cycles with personalized sessions, access controls & custom editor settings Keep everyone aligned so your team’s code stays consistent & maintainable Good to know Length of access: Lifetime License type: Professional, single-user license Redemption deadline: Redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop installation on supported Windows operating systems Max number of device(s): 1 Version: Visual Studio Professional 2026 Languages supported: English, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Czech, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese (Brazil), Russian, Spanish, and Turkish. Updates included: Minor updates and security fixes for the 2026 Professional release channel (according to Microsoft’s lifecycle policy) Activation method: Online activation with Microsoft account required Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2026 normally costs $499.99, but this deal can be yours for just $34.97, that's a saving of $465. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get Visual Studio 2026 now for just $34.97 (was $499.99) Time limited deal Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • My current phone, on left, is starting to go to sleep, and not turning on, even though I press the power button 100 times. Like CPR.   I tried factory resetting it, and nothing changed. So it's the hardware failing. I currently am using Twigby as my service provider. Cheapest I can get around here. But all their phones are carp.. https://www.twigby.com/shop/twigby-phones A friend warned me about the Moto G, as his neice has one, and isn't that good at $130. Also the Samsung A15 is laughable at best. Everything else is expensive af. I want android, (hate iOS) any version, that works with Twigby, under $100, please. Refurbished/Used is OK with me, as long as it isn't beat up.   If you know the IMEI number, you can see if it works with Twigby: https://www.twigby.com/page/byod
    • i not arguing that it isnt ######, only that it does support themes lol.
    • Bulk Crap Uninstaller 6.2 by Razvan Serea Bulk Crap Uninstaller is a free (as in speech) program uninstaller. It excels at removing large amounts of applications with minimal user input. It can clean up leftovers, detect orphaned applications, run uninstallers according to premade lists, and much more. Even though BCU was made with IT pros in mind, by default it is so straight-forward that anyone can use it effortlessly! Bulk Crap Uninstaller features: Detect and uninstall Windows Store apps Uninstall multiple items at once to speed up the process (with collision prevention) Uninstall any number of applications in a single batch Minimal user input is required during uninstallation Can find and remove leftovers after uninstallation Can uninstall some apps even if they don't have any uninstallers Detects applications with damaged or missing uninstallers Adds quiet uninstall options to some uninstallers, even if they do not support them by default Uninstall lists for automation Startup manager Verification of uninstaller certificates Fully portable, settings are saved to a single file Bulk Crap Uninstaller 6.2 changelog: Features Add invalid-uninstaller view preset by @breshinotestachegira in #903 Add certificate and integrity columns to app list by @breshinotestachegira in #894 Improve Scoop custom path detection by @breshinotestachegira in #892 Fixes Improve uninstall list load error handling by @breshinotestachegira in #895 Fix tweak visibility filtering by @breshinotestachegira in #898 Fix orphaned-only view preset by @breshinotestachegira in #899 Stabilize icon handle ownership by @breshinotestachegira in #902 Fix: Use Directory.GetLastWriteTime for install date fallback by @AniketDeshmane in #908 Do not offer to send "no way to uninstall" error messages by @Klocman in #922 Ignore ERROR_BAD_CONFIGURATION when listing MSI components by @Klocman in #924 Eat InvalidOperationException coming from ListViewGroupAccessibleObject by @Klocman in #925 Harden BCU console export and size detection - Fix BCU-console export failures by @breshinotestachegira in #897 Harden registry factory parsing by @breshinotestachegira in #893 Guard startup uninstall list loading by @breshinotestachegira in #927 Clean generated files on uninstall by @One-Simon in #928 Translations Updated Hungarian translation by @titanicbobo in #875 Updated Vietnamese translations by @wanwanvxt in #918 Fix : Swedish translation causes UI overflow in some windows by @Leise-Shadow in #865 Other Fix publish script after v6.1 by @tsiakoulias in #868 Updated the localization pack Repository Moved the repository under a new BCUninstaller organization (old links still work) Added two maintainers: @hazeliscoding and @One-Simon Added PR merge rules (require up-to-date approval and CI to pass) Updated CI script to also build the launcher (only for testing, not included in artifacts) Download: Bulk Crap Uninstaller 6.2 | 8.8 MB (Open Source) Download: Bulk Crap Uninstaller Portable | 11.6 MB View: Bulk Crap Uninstaller Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      X-No-file earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      johnjacobb40 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      210
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      146
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!