'Prometheus' sequel passed up by writer Damon Lindelof


Recommended Posts

Prometheus screenwriter Damon Lindelof has confirmed that he will not be involved in the movie's sequel.

The Lost creator, who redrafted Jon Spaihts's original script for the first film, said that potential scheduling prevented him from joining the project.

Lindelof recently worked on the screenplay for Star Trek Into Darkness and has a collaborative project with Brad Bird and a TV venture on the horizon.

"I'm usually very single-minded creatively. I can only be working on one thing at a time. So I said to [director Ridley Scott], 'I really don't think I could start working on this movie until I do this other stuff," he told Collider.

"And I don't know when the other stuff is going to be done'. And he was like, 'Well, okay, it's not like I asked you anyways'.

"He and I are on excellent terms and it was a dream come true to work with him. But much to the delight of all the fanboys, I don't see myself being involved in Prometheus-er."

Michael Fassbender and Noomi Rapace are expected to reprise their roles for the Prometheus sequel, which is rumoured to be titled Paradise and arrive in either 2014 or 2015.

http://m.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/news/a446543/prometheus-sequel-passed-up-by-writer-damon-lindelof.html

Would that be a prequel sequel? The movie industry is just getting silly these days. If a movie does halfway decent, it's a rush to copy it with another crappy sequel and use the success of the first to sell tickets to the second rather than going back and making a new good movie. But I wasn't much of a fan of the first one either, so I guess it doesn't really make a difference.

Would that be a prequel sequel? The movie industry is just getting silly these days. If a movie does halfway decent, it's a rush to copy it with another crappy sequel and use the success of the first to sell tickets to the second rather than going back and making a new good movie. But I wasn't much of a fan of the first one either, so I guess it doesn't really make a difference.

perhaps a sprequel lol.

  • Like 2

I liked the concept for Prometheus but the script was absolutely appalling - it seemed like a first draft by a college student. The characters were completely implausible and the way it shoved religion down your throat constantly was tedious and ham-handed. It's a shame as the cinematography was superb and the acting - especially by Fassbender - was generally very good (aside from the geologist character).

Fact - Prometheus was also called Paradise as a working title when the film was being made. Yeah, I watched all 3 hours of Behind the Scenes of Prometheus. I liked the movie for what it is.

Yeah, I watched all 3 hours of Behind the Scenes of Prometheus. I liked the movie for what it is.

A shallow propaganda piece, like many of Ridley Scott's films?

A shallow propaganda piece, like many of Ridley Scott's films?

When you create movies sometimes you need to kiss ass to achieve certain things. To call "many" of Scotts movies propaganda pieces is a bit of a stretch.

The movie had to go through the DoD for Scott to be able to make this, meaning that the script has to be favourable towards the army as you already know. Otherwise he just simply wouldn't have had access to free assets and locations which might otherwise prove unobtainable.

Michael Bay doesn't exactly use rocket science to produce his .. movies.

Personally I cannot think of many US army movies that are not "propaganda" pieces.

Good, his script was bloody woeful. There were more holes in the plot than a sieve. Lindelof just seemed to put cool scenes in while completely disregarding any kind of plot arcs or continuity, just like he did in Lost. I think he's a garbage writer to be honest.

To elaborate...

  • Like 1
The movie had to go through the DoD for Scott to be able to make this, meaning that the script has to be favourable towards the army as you already know. Otherwise he just simply wouldn't have had access to free assets and locations which might otherwise prove unobtainable.

Which results in a pro-US military propaganda piece. The US military should have ZERO influence in movie scripts and shouldn't be subsidising favourable movies. It's propaganda.

Which results in a pro-US military propaganda piece. The US military should have ZERO influence in movie scripts and shouldn't be subsidising favourable movies. It's propaganda.

How do you imagine this could happen? .. in this world.

Edit: I do agree with you. It should not be the way it is.. sadly that is a big topic and we cannot really do much about it.

Good, his script was bloody woeful. There were more holes in the plot than a sieve. Lindelof just seemed to put cool scenes in while completely disregarding any kind of plot arcs or continuity, just like he did in Lost. I think he's a garbage writer to be honest.

To elaborate...

I have to agree.

I liked the concept for Prometheus but the script was absolutely appalling - it seemed like a first draft by a college student. The characters were completely implausible and the way it shoved religion down your throat constantly was tedious and ham-handed. It's a shame as the cinematography was superb and the acting - especially by Fassbender - was generally very good (aside from the geologist character).

What a surprise, a movie where thinking and open mindness are a necessity, and you didn't get it. It wasn't the usual Hollywood here's the plot at the beginning with the predictable end and all the brain dead types pan it for being smart, yet you're usually the first one whinging about how crap most movies are, including the super smart ones

A shallow propaganda piece, like many of Ridley Scott's films?

You linked to a Socialist web site, any point you might have thought you were making is void and null, come back with a smart response next time puppet

What a surprise, a movie where thinking and open mindness are a necessity, and you didn't get it. It wasn't the usual Hollywood here's the plot at the beginning with the predictable end and all the brain dead types pan it for being smart, yet you're usually the first one whinging about how crap most movies are, including the super smart ones

This movie was anything but smart.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Stop asking people that. It's a "No True Scotsman" argument in that you are attempting to discredit the opinions of a person by Attacking the Messenger. The reason that these are logical fallacies is the TRUTH is based on facts as supported by evidence. Nothing else. So, always debate the facts with evidence to reach the truth. Once you learn to do this, you'll be able to recognize when people are fearmongering and lying to you for their own selfish ends.
    • It doesn't matter if you didn't directly hear it from person X or Y. Every one of your statements comes straight from the racist, skinhead, anti-immigrant, be afraid of everything, "they are all taking our jobs", etc. etc. mouthpieces. That's where Farag and Putin heard it from too...and used it against the UK. So, while you keep disavowing the people who publicly peddled that position, you keep proving over and over again that those lies influenced you into being tricked when the Brexit vote came around too. In fact, your final sentence makes it crystal clear that it was the racist/anti-immigrant lies you fell and voted for, since you stated that you didn't have an issue with the economic trade issues with the EU. Ahem. To be clear, all of these LIES are EONS old, mate. They are the same fearmongering lies peddled to the same ignorant, gullible cowards by the same charlatans, snake-oil salesmen, and would be demagogues who've been doing this since caveman Ugh lied about his slightly different neighbor in order to steal his land. And, finally, you answered your own previous question. The reason that the EU isn't clamoring to bring the UK back is that they have had enough of people who would rather shoot themselves in the foot than get over their "insecurity issues". It's the same reason the entire world is moving away from the USA as fast as it can...
    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      224
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!