Recommended Posts

hey windows x, nice work...but.. like cat was telling you, it would have been smarter to start your OWN thread and saying you releasing a pdc login, im not sure you'ld be very happy if i post my own longhorn pack into your thread right? and if this is just a kinda (beta) why not helping us make a good one, or tell us how to fix this and this instead of saying "this is working on mine blablabla.."

anyway..i dont wanna start flamming, if you are more experienced in those things, thats good, if you don't wanna help and do it yourself, thats ok, but dont kill our works.

Thx

Regards

-BuG

Thanks BuG - I agree we should all work together on this. My version is in Beta 2 - by no means the final version yet - and will go through lots of revisions while we help each other. But if Windows X is as good as he claims in his posts (in not so many words) then I am happy to work with him on resolving the issues we all have on this login.

Do what ever you wish but don't mess within my file (personalize your own) And remember, this is very old file from mine (So I'm first one?).

Think that was the last thing on my mind :rolleyes:

The login you supplied is corrupt unfortunately Windows X, maybe you will re release it in your own thread for your release ? - please don't detract from my work like that. - no flaming intended, I just respect politeness ;) If you'd like to join forces with me an bug just PM us and we can work together properly as a community effort on Neowin :)

Thanks

Cat.

Edited by thecat2000
hey windows x, nice work...but.. like cat was telling you, it would have been smarter to start your OWN thread and saying you releasing a pdc login, im not sure you'ld be very happy if i post my own longhorn pack into your thread right? and if this is just a kinda (beta) why not helping us make a good one, or tell us how to fix this and this instead of saying "this is working on mine blablabla.."

anyway..i dont wanna start flamming, if you are more experienced in those things, thats good, if you don't wanna help and do it yourself, thats ok, but dont kill our works.

Thx

Regards

-BuG

I never thought to release this login seperately before my Longhorn Pack and this time. I just can't let meself seeing this thing like it was and I didn't plan to mess your work so I put my fix in right? Positive thinking please.

hmm thats why they are called BETA's they have bugs in them - but by no means are they the final versions. Just test copy's BuG and I are still working on other parts of this login at the moment. So I have some more revisions to make yet.

If you want to work alone with your login thats fine, but release your work in your own thread ?? - its kind of respectful to do that rather than try to damage the work BuG and I are doing. Like I said we should really share idea's on this - that would be nice. Sure my login may need some work on it yet. But give it time It will be fine and unique to our own standards and quality of the kind of login we want.

Regards

Cat.

quote: I just can't let meself seeing this thing like it was and I didn't plan to mess your work so I put my fix in right?

ok, but why not instead of realesing yours with the 'fixes' you telling us what to change, as you saw in the thread we got couples of problems with it, why not helping us instead of showing yours... we admit we need help on couples of point..if you know how to solve them tell us, better than putin a link to yours saying its working...

quote: I just can't let meself seeing this thing like it was and I didn't plan to mess your work so I put my fix in right?

ok, but why not instead of realesing yours with the 'fixes' you telling us what to change, as you saw in the thread we got couples of problems with it, why not helping us instead of showing yours... we admit we need help on couples of point..if you know how to solve them tell us, better than putin a link to yours saying its working...

You said yourself "if you know how to solve them tell us"

That's why I post my file, to help you know how to do not messing your work. By the way, if you still thinking I'm not allies, I'll let this off before your flamming begin.

Windows X where can we get a copy of your login please ? - believe your intention is to HELP us with our login, so ok ! - Please share your version so I can sort the bugs out with our version :) I am sorry if any misunderstanding was happening too.

I'd like any help on sorting the bugs out ! thats really apprieciated. :) your link earlier just had a damaged file in side.

If you can share it again I will have a look at your work and I can start on making a Beta 3 for Mine and BuG's release

Thanks

Cat.

I think I already told you all what you should do in page 9? Because of your word

"ok, but why not instead of realesing yours with the 'fixes' you telling us what to change, as you saw in the thread we got couples of problems with it, why not helping us instead of showing yours... we admit we need help on couples of point..if you know how to solve them tell us, better than putin a link to yours saying its working..."

I will do what he want because you want it like this before right? I just wanna put that file for let you guys explore mine for learning from my previously work but he said no so I won't post it till I release my Longhorn Transformation Pack.

Suit yourself ;) no loss to me what you do at least I tried to clear up any misunderstanding we had on this. I wasn't happy about the way you 'offered' your help by posting your version right in my thread. That was NOT polite. If you had of PM'ed it to us 'for so called learning' from your older version that would have been polite and curteous. Posting it the way you did in our thread was making your version 'publically' available thus taking attention away from our own development on our release. Besides I started this release of the PDC login, I'd say it is down to me what I do with this login NOT YOU or anyone else.

I have been skinning applications since 2001 Windows X, I will figure out my own login screen acceptible to how I want it made based on user feedback. (as I always have done)

Cat.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!