openSUSE (KDE) vs Mint (Cinnamon)


Recommended Posts

Hey everyone, I was hoping you guys could help me out with a few things.

Background: I've been an Ubuntu user for a while now, and for some reason, I just haven't warmed up to Unity. I've also used LinuxMint intermittently.

So, I've decided to try something different. Here are the two options I'm considering:

openSUSE (KDE)

LinuxMint (Cinnamon)

Now, I have never used KDE before, but after fiddling around with it for a couple of days, I think I can get used to it.

Here are my main concerns though:

1. Which is more widely supported KDE or Gnome? openSUSE or Mint?

2. Of the two distros, which is more stable?

3. Can Gnome applications be used safely within KDE and vice versa? For example, I am running KDE but would like to use Nautilus as the default file manager

4. I am very familiar with the Ubuntu terminal. How much different are operations within the openSUSE terminal?

5. How limited is the software selection of openSUSE compared to Mint/Ubuntu?

Please just give me your honest opinions without any distro bashing!

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1128068-opensuse-kde-vs-mint-cinnamon/
Share on other sites

openSUSe is a widely supported Distro aswell but not as much as Mint/Ubuntu etc

to answer your questions

1. Mint, more people use it thus its more widely supported of the two, but there is still a great wealth of knowledge on openSuse too

2. I have only used mint on and off and it seemed stable and also opensuse is very stable aswell

3. You can use them in both but you would need the files installed for both, KDE uses Dolphin as a file manager, i quite liked that so give it a try :)

4. What sort of commands do you mean, i think Mint uses apt-get Suse uses YAST and Zypper this only makes a small difference in the sense that to install chrome on openSuse you would do


sudo zypper in google-chrome
[/CODE]

and in Mint

[CODE]
sudo apt-get install google-chrome
[/CODE]

5. Any software you get for Mint/Ubuntu is usually available in openSuse too, i have not come across anything that was not, even if there is not a Opensuse package for it you could build it :)

i hope that helps

Thank you for your reply. I have decided to stick with openSUSE for now, but I seem to be running into a problem.

When I download an .rpm to install, I continually get this type of error:

Failed to install

The query is not valid

Could not resolve <file path>

Do you know why I would be getting this?

I use to use Opensuse and I've always found it more difficult to use than Debian based distros. Opensuse does have a stellar KDE experience, though. I just prefer Gnome, so I would pick Cinnamon over KDE. However, I use a browser for 85% or more of my computing these days, so as long as I can install Chrome I am good regardless of the distro.

Yes, I am starting to realize how much more difficult openSUSE/KDE is to use. I've had no major problems yet, just lots of little issues that I've never experienced under Ubuntu/Gnome. I am hoping that after spending much initial time tweaking/fixing everything to my liking that I will encounter no more problems in the future.

However, I THINK I am going to stick with openSUSE. I do like KDE, especially the control it gives me. However, I feel like it isn't always as polished as Gnome in some respects.

I am still unsold on the advantages of an rpm-based distro over .deb-based, but perhaps this is personal preference.

This is true, however I have been told by numerous sources that openSUSE offers the best KDE experience.

Personal opinion of course, but for when the KDE mood hits me, I also felt the OpenSUSE version to be a fair bit above Kubuntu's, it just felt a lot more polished and refined.. just "more complete". (Although I dislike YaST with a passion.) Used to find Kubuntu's stability a bit lacking as well, various things would crash quite frequently, but the last release I tried seems to have corrected a lot of that. That and the former KDEMod from Arch, that was quite good too, although I've yet to try their new release of Chakra, its on the to-do for one of these days.

Yes, I am also finding that I dislike YaST. I am also a little confused by the customization and themes. It seems as if the login theme chooser does not work at all, and one therefore must edit the sysconfig file.

Same deal with the splash-screens, some of which I can change, and others I cant seem to figure out.

I never cared much for YAST either. I wouldn't hold that much stock in statements like "Suse has the best KDE experience". These things

are very personal and often change over time. Suse does have a fine KDE desktop but I really prefer the new Mint KDE or Kubuntu. You should download

some live images and give a couple of them a try. They won't be a smooth booting off a disk or usb drive but you will be able to

compare them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
    • All it does is use the CPU more efficiently during boot to speed up boot times. That's it. Yawn....
    • It's not a one or the other kind of thing. Software should run efficiently, and the operating system should appropriately manage the CPU clocks. You could have the best most optimized software on earth, and it will still run faster if the CPU does a better job of boosting as needed. All this is doing is pre-boosting the CPU based on user actions, instead of waiting for the normal detection mechanism to kick in. If the OS knows it is about to need more CPU, why shouldn't it use that knowledge? It's the same idea of downshifting before passing someone, instead of just burying your foot into the peddle and waiting for the transmission to figure out what you want to do.
    • Audacity 3.7.8 by Razvan Serea Audacity is a free, open source digital audio editor and recording application. Edit your sounds using cut, copy, and paste features (with unlimited undo functionality), mix tracks, or apply effects to your recordings. The program also has a built-in amplitude-envelope editor, a customizable spectrogram mode, and a frequency-analysis window for audio-analysis applications. Built-in effects include bass boost, wah wah, and noise removal, and the program also supports VST plug-in effects. You can use Audacity to: Record live audio. Record computer playback on any Windows Vista or later machine. Convert tapes and records into digital recordings or CDs. Edit WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP2, MP3 or Ogg Vorbis sound files. AC3, M4A/M4R (AAC), WMA and other formats supported using optional libraries. Cut, copy, splice or mix sounds together. Numerous effects including change the speed or pitch of a recording. Write your own plug-in effects with Nyquist. And more! See the complete list of features. Audacity 3.7.8 changelog: #10688 Fixed an exception thrown when pasting into a newly-created track (Thanks, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!) #10870, #10884, #10775, #10629 Fixed tone generation, waveform-scale setting, SetClip Name parameter, and clip-boundary command names for scripting and macros (Thank you, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!) #11106 Fixed the loading of presets for the Distortion effect (A million thanks, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!) #10947 Fixed paste into an empty audio track not preserving the source sample rate (Thanks, Juan Gabriel Colonna (@juancolonna)!) #10776 Allowed AltGr modifier in label and clip name editing (Thanks, Davide Peressoni (@DPDmancul)!) #9938 Added options to choose where silence is truncated (start/middle/end) (Thanks, Noah Rosenfield (@nosenfield)!) #9935 Added Podcast 2.0 chapters JSON export for label tracks (Thanks, Noah Rosenfield (@nosenfield)!) #10103 Improve UI on HiDPI displays on Linux/wxGTK (Thanks, Ivan A. Melnikov (@iv-m)!) #10099 Fixed MixerBoard Mute and Solo button display (Thanks, Ivan A. Melnikov (@iv-m)!) #10681 Fixed multichannel FLAC import #10999 Fixed envelope being broken after joining clips Download: Audacity 64-bit | Standalone ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Audacity 32-bit | Standalone Download: Audacity ARM64 | Standalone View: Audacity Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!