Recommended Posts

Internal IP you can just setup a static IP address on your computer, or do it on the router. with Windows 7 it is very easy, go into the properties on your network adapter and manually enter a static IP address.

post-120066-0-77165700-1356792858.png

Internal IP you can just setup a static IP address on your computer, or do it on the router. with Windows 7 it is very easy, go into the properties on your network adapter and manually enter a static IP address.

^^ This

I'd do it in the router though by assigning an IP to your Mac address so you don't get any IP conflicts.

DHCP shouldn't assign an IP to any device if another device on the network has that IP, be it static or Automatically Assign

I have static on my PC and Automatic on just about everything else and never get a conflict

"DHCP shouldn't assign an IP to any device if another device on the network has that IP, be it static or Automatically Assign"

It shouldn't no - but its a VERY VERY BAD idea to setup static IPs on the host that fall within the dhcp scope.

So for example if your dhcp server hands out 192.168.1.100 to .150, and you want to setup a static on the host itself then it is better option to use 192.168.1.1 to 99, or .151 to .254

Keeping in mind whatever other statics you might have set, your routers static IP, etc.

Yes depending on your dhcp server and and even dhcp client, you should not hand out dupe IPs. Your dhcp server could check for them before it hands out, or even the client when gets an offer for specific IP can check to see if any other host has that IP and then send the dhcp server a decline message

DHCPDECLINE

Sent by a client to a specific server in response to a DHCPACK message, which contain parameters which the client has determined are not in fact valid. For example, the client might test an IP address it has received by sending an ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) message on its shared LAN to see if any other host has been assigned this address; if it discovers that another host is in fact using this address, it must send a DHCPDECLINE message to the server which supplied the address. This both allows the server to release the resources it has allocated to this client, and inform a system administrator of the problem. (Such a problem might arise in a situation in which a host has been manually configured by an administrator with an IP address, but the DHCP server hasn?t been informed that this address is no longer available in its pool. Though it is suggested that a server test an address before allocating it to a client [1, section 3.1, point 2], for example by ?pinging? the address to see if another host is using it, it may be that the test or the response to it is lost, incorrectly suggesting to the server that the address is available.)

But not all dhcp clients support this, nor do all dhcp servers -- the dhcp servers in soho routers are normally very limited in features, etc..

Normally its a better idea to setup a reservation on your dhcp server to always hand out same IP to host normally based on its mac yes. This way host can get other updated info you might hand out in dhcp, dns, gateway, local domain, ntp server, etc. etc. But either works be it you set the static on the host or setup a reservation.

"DHCP shouldn't assign an IP to any device if another device on the network has that IP, be it static or Automatically Assign"

It shouldn't no - but its a VERY VERY BAD idea to setup static IPs on the host that fall within the dhcp scope.

So for example if your dhcp server hands out 192.168.1.100 to .150, and you want to setup a static on the host itself then it is better option to use 192.168.1.1 to 99, or .151 to .254

Keeping in mind whatever other statics you might have set, your routers static IP, etc.

Yes depending on your dhcp server and and even dhcp client, you should not hand out dupe IPs. Your dhcp server could check for them before it hands out, or even the client when gets an offer for specific IP can check to see if any other host has that IP and then send the dhcp server a decline message

DHCPDECLINE

Sent by a client to a specific server in response to a DHCPACK message, which contain parameters which the client has determined are not in fact valid. For example, the client might test an IP address it has received by sending an ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) message on its shared LAN to see if any other host has been assigned this address; if it discovers that another host is in fact using this address, it must send a DHCPDECLINE message to the server which supplied the address. This both allows the server to release the resources it has allocated to this client, and inform a system administrator of the problem. (Such a problem might arise in a situation in which a host has been manually configured by an administrator with an IP address, but the DHCP server hasn?t been informed that this address is no longer available in its pool. Though it is suggested that a server test an address before allocating it to a client [1, section 3.1, point 2], for example by ?pinging? the address to see if another host is using it, it may be that the test or the response to it is lost, incorrectly suggesting to the server that the address is available.)

But not all dhcp clients support this, nor do all dhcp servers -- the dhcp servers in soho routers are normally very limited in features, etc..

Normally its a better idea to setup a reservation on your dhcp server to always hand out same IP to host normally based on its mac yes. This way host can get other updated info you might hand out in dhcp, dns, gateway, local domain, ntp server, etc. etc. But either works be it you set the static on the host or setup a reservation.

Thanks for the explanation, just realised that I have done exactly that, DHCP from .100 with maximum 50 clients, main PC static on .3

Also running DD-WRT so hopefully had I not done that, would have been slightly more advanced than the average firmware and managed to avoid my static :)

My router has something called "static DHCP" accessed from the following RCP area:

More settings>Network Settings>LAN settings>Set Static DHCP>

It has the following options:

  • IP Address:
  • MAC Address:
  • Comment:

Description: Reserve an IP address for a specific user. Enter the IP Address that you would like to use and enter the MAC Address for the user that will be associated to this IP address .
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like no official TBW rating, which should be a required listing in my opinion for sites like Amazon (hell, put it on the box too.)
    • I think I understood the article fine. Online password managers open users up to more possibilities of getting hacked, and due to KeePass being offline and local it reduces the idea of getting hacked. If someone chooses to put their database online they're kinda missing the point. With regards to the idea of the on-prem idea, I would have two issues. I'm not sure about the first issue, but I wouldn't be surprised about them offering a cloud storage for the passwords that most wouldn't bother to switch off, regardless of if they went for on-prem or not. The second issue is that the on-prem solution for Bitwarden costs money, whereas KeePass is free and open-source (as far as I am aware). The article points out how to sync the database between devices, and I recognise that deficiency in security. But it isn't a necessity. So both services can offer a same idea, but one is free and the other isn't...choices, choices.... But to each their own.
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.2 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.2 changelog: Added New Twilight theme (#1292) Optional download completion notifications on Android (#1290) Fixed Fixed a crash on some older CPUs on Windows Fixed oversized system tray icon on macOS Improved Updated translations Prevented Android devices from sleeping while downloads are active (#1291) Various UI and UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.2 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I am not surprised because life is the product of a lot of biochemical and physical processes that releases various energies as a by-product. The only thing new here is the detection of these photon emissions. The researches noted this "glow" is not a metaphysical one. They don't even immediately end when one is dead. Things like fires, light bulbs, and on a bigger scale stars release a lot more "light" and they are hardly alive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!