• 0

Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2013


Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2013  

206 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Agnitum Anti Virus/Outpost
      0
    • Alwil Avast! Pro/Internet Security
      4
    • AVG Antivirus PRO/Internet Security
      4
    • Avira Antivirus Premium/Pro/Endpoint
      3
    • Beijing Rising Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • Comodo Endpoint Security/Internet Security Pro
      2
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware/Internet Security
      2
    • ESET NOD32/Smart Security/Endpoint Security
      68
    • F-Secure Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • G Data Anti Virus/Interet Security/Total Security
      1
    • Kaspersky Anti Virus/Internet Security/Pure
      28
    • MalwareBytes Anti Malware PRO
      5
    • McAfee Anti Virus/Internet Security/Total Protection
      1
    • Microsoft Forefront
      1
    • MWTI eScan Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • Norman Anti Virus/Security Suite
      0
    • Panda Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • BitDefender Anti Virus/Internet Security/Total Security
      29
    • Sophos Endpoint
      3
    • SUPERAntiSpyware
      0
    • Symantec/PC Tools/Norton
      38
    • Trend Micro Anti Virus/Internet Security
      4
    • Webroot
      6
    • Other (please specify)
      7


Question

It's a new year, and a new poll for Definitive Best Antivirus. The 2012 thread can be found here.

This is a poll for best Paid antivirus, there is a separate thread for free antiviruses here.

Any questions or software that I've missed, please post here and I will update the thread.

Regards

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1128434-definitive-best-paid-antivirus-2013/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Hello,

I noticed a few products you might want to add:

Ahb Lab V3/V3 Internet Security - Korean company, some presence in North America

BeyondTrust PowerBroker Endpoint Protection/Retina CS - formerly eEye Digital Security

BullGuard AntiVirus/Internet Security - UK-based company, present in Europe

Checkpoint Antivirus/Internet Security - acquired Zone Labs

CommTouch Antivirus - CommTouch acquired F-PROT Antivirus earlier this year

Coranti Multi-Engine AntiVirus & AntiSpyware - Japanese company, some presence in Europe

Defenx Antivirus/Internet Security - Swiss company

Dr. Web (Dialogue Science) Anti Virus/Security Space - #2 antivirus in Russia/CIS after Kaspersky

GFI (formerly Sunbelt Software) VIPRE Antivirus

Hauri ViRobot Internet Security - Korean company, large presence in India and Latin America

IKARUS virus.utilities - Austrian company, well-regarded in Central Europe

INCA Internet nProtect - Korean company, used by many gamers there

Intego VirusBarrier - Mac OS X product

K7 Computing Total Security - Indian company, large presense in Japan

QuickHeal AntiVirus/Internet Security/Total Security - Indian company, formerly CAT Computer Services

SafeNet eSAFE - formerly Aladdin Knowledledge Systems (even more formerly Eliashim)

Total Defense Anti Virus/Internet Security - formerly Computer Associates

TrustPort Antivirus/Internet Security/Total Security - Czech company, formerly AEC

VirusBlokAda VBA32 - Belarusian company, probably best known for discovering Stuxnet worm

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

  • 0

I like Avast Internet Security. It does a good job for me. I get an error when I try to vote. Saying I have to vote in all polls. I only see one?

Same, I think the poll assumes the continued part is a different poll

[#10355] You must cast your vote in each question of the poll.

NOD32 for me

  • 0

Have been using ESET for the last couple of years after some bad experiences with Microsoft Security Essentials.. have been very happy with it so far.

  • Like 2
  • 0

I use Eset EndPoint across my office machines and am very happy with it, so casting my vote for Eset. Using Kaspersky on my home PC though so I can see what it's like, alongside Malwarebytes.

  • 0

Btw your poll is fubard, you have to select both 1 option in the original and extended list.

Back to topic, I've always been recommending Kaspersky to people since I first started using it 9 years ago. It'd been nothing but a breath of fresh air and not exaggerating but I've been virus free in all this time and it has blocked quite a fair few things.

  • 0

Hello,

Beijing Rising, Kingsoft and Qihoo might not be as well known in the West, but they are three of the largest anti-malware companies in China.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

A lot of these antivirus packages have terrible names. Who is going to install something on their computer called "Beijing Rising Anti Virus/Internet Security"
  • 0

Same, I think the poll assumes the continued part is a different poll

[#10355] You must cast your vote in each question of the poll.

I've edited the poll to resolve this issue.

I voted for ESET NOD32 and Smart Security.

  • Like 2
  • 0

I just switched from Kaspersky to G-Data. It's always rated highly on the comparatives list, and it just plain works. It is also so much faster than Kaspersky when scanning. I've used ESET in the past as well, and frankly it was one of the worst experiences I have ever had with software.

So I voted G-Data. If you haven't tried it, you honestly should.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!