Recommended Posts

So, either it doesn't exist or I am missing something. After installing the Google Chrome GPO into my Central Store and creating a policy to apply to users in the domain, everything is working fine. However I don't see any way to prevent the usage of "Clear all browsing data..." under history.

Anyone else have any experience with this, am I missing it or did they leave this option out for some reason. And if they did, any other ways to prevent it's usage?

I *think* the workaround is to click "clear history" and then untick all the boxes, then click OK, so that nothing is actually ticked to delete and the button effectively does nothing. AFAIK it saves that setting.

Not sure how to disable it altogether.

I *think* the workaround is to click "clear history" and then untick all the boxes, then click OK, so that nothing is actually ticked to delete and the button effectively does nothing. AFAIK it saves that setting.

Not sure how to disable it altogether.

Right but in the group policy, none of those options exist, I need to deploy it across our network to all clients. That's the main issue.

don't allow people to use chrome

use a webfilter so that they can pretend to delete their history all day long (they cant delete webfilter history, tying their history to their username regardless of where they sign on to)

I would strongly opt for #2. There are other things that you can do that will capture history that arent free and can't be deleted by the individual even if they choose to nuke their computer.

don't allow people to use chrome

use a webfilter so that they can pretend to delete their history all day long (they cant delete webfilter history, tying their history to their username regardless of where they sign on to)

I would strongly opt for #2. There are other things that you can do that will capture history that arent free and can't be deleted by the individual even if they choose to nuke their computer.

Yeah I have considered blocking chrome domain wide, problem is over half of our systems are running XP with IE8, and that brings into play some issues with HTML5 sites not rendering correctly.

Any suggestions on a a web-filter/logger that either works locally as a client app with a central management console, or something that runs through like a proxy server. Network is all Windows Domain/OS based.

proxy

squid proxy with squid guard (free)

pfsense with squid guard (free)

websense

barracuda webfilter

bluecoat webfilter

forefront threat management gateway

safesquid

gfi webmonitor

sonicwall with the webfilter addon

software

k9 (free for personal use)

spector

I have used websense, k9, sonicwall, and the barracuda. There are many more out there. The 2 appliances (sonicwall and the barracuda) and the software websense, can be set up as a pass through that integrate with active directory. They log who what where and when, they can be setup to just monitor or setup to block certain things like viruses, porn, gaming, as well as specific applications like skype and yahoo instant messenger. You can leave it as relaxed (no other options other than monitoring) or tighten your grip either on a specific user or group of users limiting them to 1 website during the times of 12:00 and 1:00 and denying them complete access to the internet at all other times and all they would be able to go to is basketweaving.com during those times or maybe hampsterdance.com. How you choose to implement is up to you.

All of these mentioned will integrate with active directory.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Plans. Christ at least editorialise this tripe for what it is or put your own journalistic take on it.
    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!