Reinstalling Windows with seperate RAID 5 Array


Recommended Posts

Good thing you didn't do "re-initialization" - that wipes the disks clean ;)

I'm not sure the details of your controller - not sure what a flush cache command does on this specific controller. But if disk is seen offline, normally you would have to force it back online when it was seen again.

Glad you got it sorted. In the future - the only reason you would disconnect disks when installing, if you want to make sure you know which one your installing too because say you have 2 disks of the same size or maker, etc. Windows is not going to just pick some disk to install the boot or system too.. Its going to use the one you say to use. While I agree with the nature of the suggestion of removing the other drives during install -- you have to be careful in a case where controller of an array might think its drives died when it turns on and does not seem them ;)

  On 20/01/2013 at 14:05, BudMan said:

Good thing you didn't do "re-initialization" - that wipes the disks clean ;)

If done right it does not wipe the disks as I show for recovering a RAID at the end.

http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-6004

And in that doc it clearly states in the very start.

"In the Advanced set the strip size you had before and do not check Initialize volume or do any Initializing just yet."

Which was my point. Once the array is back online, and you want to do a verification of the data, which according to the intel raid ui under verification.

Initializing a volume is the process of synchronizing all redundant data on a volume prior to verifying or verifying and repairing that data. If you attempt to start a verification process for a volume that has not been initialized, you will be prompted to do so.

Initialize a disk/array is normally what you do when you create - normally it means WIPE!! I would be very careful to understand exactly what your controller or software means when it says init.

examples

Q: What exactly is initialization (the RAID controller is prompting to do this to my new array)?

A: Initializing a logical hard drive erases all data on every hard drive included in the logical RAID array and effectively resets the array. The process of initialization places zeros in the data fields of a logical RAID drive and creates the parity information necessary to allow the logical drive to successfully pass a consistency check.

http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/ss4000-e/sb/CS-026151.htm

If you decide to initialize you will lose all existing data on the RAID array. It may be prudent to try other steps first to repair the failed array.

Without fully understanding the exact controller/software user was using and exactly what the user was doing - telling them to init something could very well lead to data loss.. Which was something the user was adamant about avoiding

  On 20/01/2013 at 17:39, BudMan said:

And in that doc it clearly states in the very start.

"In the Advanced set the strip size you had before and do not check Initialize volume or do any Initializing just yet."

Thats when you re-create the lost array and then you recovery the partition and then you do a verify to which it asks you that you have to Initialize before you can run verify.

If you Initialize with the wrong strip size when you re-create the array then it wipes the data.

I should know because who do you think did the doc?

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft reportedly planning to lay off thousands of employees, mostly in sales by Usama Jawad Back in May 2025, Microsoft decided to lay off 3% of its workforce, which amounted to roughly 6,000 employees. It claimed that this decision allowed it to implement better organizational changes in a "dynamic marketplace". Now, a new report claims that the Redmond tech firm is planning to lay off thousands more next month. Citing unnamed sources, Bloomberg reports that as the company continues investing heavily in its AI ventures, it is about to announce layoffs of thousands of workers as early as next month. This reduction in workforce will primarily affect sales teams, but they won't be the only ones affected. That said, the sources did mention that the timing for this announcement may change. This move, if true, won't be entirely surprising. In April 2025, Microsoft announced that it will be relying more on third-party firms to sell its software to small- and medium-sized customers. It's currently unclear how many employees will be impacted by this change, but even if the layoff percentage is in the single digits, it would still be significant as it would be impacting the professional careers of thousands. The May 2025 layoffs primarily impacted engineering and product teams. The other major round of layoffs prior to this was the decision to eliminate 10,000 jobs back in January 2023. Those represented 5% of the total workforce at that time, with numerous teams, including the one leading Mixed Reality (MR) efforts, being heavily impacted. It is interesting to note that if the timing of the announcement for layoffs is accurate, it would be soon after Microsoft closes its fiscal year at the end of June 2025. Although we'll get financial reports for the latest quarter soon after too, one has to wonder what the human cost of profit is, as Microsoft continues to report billions of dollars in revenue every quarter. Source: Bloomberg (paywall)
    • Ah .. lockout for suspicious activity. I bet they uploaded the SanDisk utility detected as malware
    • Microsoft 365 will soon disable outdated authentication protocols for file access by Usama Jawad On a fairly regular basis, Microsoft disables outdated protocols that are used to access its services. In the past few years, the company has deprecated Basic Auth in Exchange Online and cut access to Outlook for third-party apps relying on this protocol. Now, it has decided to get rid of old authentication protocols for file access across Microsoft 365 services. As reported by Bleeping Computer, Microsoft has posted a message on its Microsoft 365 Admin Center. Starting from mid-July 2025, the company will begin disabling legacy authentication protocols used to access files across Microsoft 365 and Office apps, SharePoint, and OneDrive. Essentially, applications or services which use the Relying Party Suite (RPS) or FrontPage Remote Procedure Call (FPRPC) will to perform browser-based authentication to perform open operations on Office files will no longer be able to do so. As expected, this is primarily being done to improve the cybersecurity posture of various services. Microsoft states that RPS can be brute-forced and phished with relative ease as it is fairly outdated. Similarly, FPRPC is typically used for remote web page authoring and it is susceptible to exploitation through various vulnerabilities too. As such, both of these protocols will be disabled by default starting from mid-July 2025, with the rollout of this change targeting completion by August 2025. The Redmond tech giant will update the protocol baseline by default without mandating any licensing changes for customers. In addition, once these modifications are rolled out, Microsoft 365 will require admin consent to get third-party access to files and sites. IT admins can view the guidance available here to configure admin consent workflows. Microsoft says that these changes align with the principles of its Secure Future Initiative (SFI). Earlier today, it announced the rollout of improved security defaults for Windows 365 citing the same reasons too.
    • This is how you kill your own business.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Fuzz_c earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      TIGOSS earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      slackerzz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      vivetool earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      pnajbar earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      704
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      283
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      216
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      195
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      131
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!