Recommended Posts

huh ? guess it's funny if you're drunk and 13. or something.

You must be 13 if you didn't understand what the man is writing there and is trying to say. I guess you are not old enough to know because you probably were born after Seagal became famous so you don't know the story behind it. It's OK.

You must be 13 if you didn't understand what the man is writing there and is trying to say. I guess you are not old enough to know because you probably were born after Seagal became famous so you don't know the story behind it. It's OK.

im 32 so I was alive for his "fame" and I agree with hawkman

Humour is a very...individual thing. What you may find hilarious may be deathly boring for others. Don't be offended, nor flame users should your particular brand of humour differ.

With that said, I don't see the humour in this (well, more to the point I can see what is supposed to be funny, I just don't laugh at it the same way that I don't laugh at the Chuck Norris exaggerations). I am going to go and watch Executive Decision again though. Kurt Russell FTW!

I laughed. But to be fair it was just cause the article itself didn't get anything out of me, but I then scrolled back up and saw the site slogan on their banner.

I had to go back to the site and take a look. Ok, I chuckled at that given the article. :laugh: (Y)

I laughed. But to be fair it was just cause the article itself didn't get anything out of me, but I then scrolled back up and saw the site slogan on their banner.

I'm assuming you're referring to the "it's where humour goes to die" slogan, in which case I would counter that it was never alive to begin with.

Never cared for the man at all, saw one of his pressers early on and he pretty much stated he didn't care if anyone saw his movie or not. He did earn kudos in my book when I found out he regularly works as a deputy in Louisiana. Although A&E created a series around it, he's been helping out for over 20 years now. But I can't recall seeing any of his movies.

  • Like 2

It's like someone saw "The Best Page in the Universe", thought "I can write a site like that", wrote a bunch of s**t and uploaded to the internet without realising that in-fact, he could not.

The man is an icon. Even at his current age of 60, I still wouldn't mess with him. He is quite funny when he wants to be.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWtB_hQpFEI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf_cgCDn8YA

Is there a bigger douchebag on the planet? Methinks not.

The real question is: Is there a fatter celebrity on the planet?

I keep asking myself: What the hell happened to his weight? He used to be so skinny and all of the sudden he ballooned into that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!