Recommended Temp?


Recommended Posts

check and make sure your heatsink is not angled on top of your cpu. that temperature is way high. is your comp unstable at all?

Been running fine for about 4 days now for extended period of times. When I installed the chip and HSF (boxed retail, btw) I made sure it was all secure and seated flat. I'm getting worried now though... :(

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/113189-recommended-temp/#findComment-1330407
Share on other sites

the performance mode (PAT right?) shouldnt increase the temperature at all, since thats a feature of the i875 chipset and not the processor.

Yeah that's what I was talking about.

How would I know if the HSF is not seated right? When I installed it I tried jiggling it to make sure it was secure and it didn't budge and looked flat as far as I could tell. If it was angled in any way it would move, correct? :unsure: :unsure:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/113189-recommended-temp/#findComment-1330583
Share on other sites

Yeah that's what I was talking about.

How would I know if the HSF is not seated right? When I installed it I tried jiggling it to make sure it was secure and it didn't budge and looked flat as far as I could tell. If it was angled in any way it would move, correct? :unsure: :unsure:

it would probably wiggle if it were not on right. the stock heatsink really latches down securely, so it should be relatively easy to tell if its on right or not. if it looks to be alright, then maybe your board just has a bad temp probe, but you cant really verify that without a measurement from somewhere else. if your computer is stable and everything is secured down, id say the board is reporting the temp wrong.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/113189-recommended-temp/#findComment-1330612
Share on other sites

Yeah that's what I was talking about.

How would I know if the HSF is not seated right?  When I installed it I tried jiggling it to make sure it was secure and it didn't budge and looked flat as far as I could tell.  If it was angled in any way it would move, correct?  :unsure:  :unsure:

it would probably wiggle if it were not on right. the stock heatsink really latches down securely, so it should be relatively easy to tell if its on right or not. if it looks to be alright, then maybe your board just has a bad temp probe, but you cant really verify that without a measurement from somewhere else. if your computer is stable and everything is secured down, id say the board is reporting the temp wrong.

When I was locking down the HSF I could tell it wasn't seated right when I would try to move it slightly a corner would feel loose. Then I just pressed a little harder and everything clicked and when I tried to move it again it was solid and wouldn't budge. Since I've built it I haven't had any lockups or crashes and have been playing a fair share of WarCraft III in addition to some encoding. So I'm not really sure what's going on anymore, lol. I think I'll try contacting Asus to see what they have to say. I'm running the latest BIOS as well for that board.

edit:

Just emailed Asus and I'll see if they have anything to add. Is it possible that I somehow damaged the CPU probe during the installation of the HSF? The CPU and Mobo probes are separate right? The mobo temp is around 30C, which is about right I think. Damn I'm going nuts.... :wacko: :wacko: :wacko:

Edited by Mav Phoenix
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/113189-recommended-temp/#findComment-1330636
Share on other sites

Well I tried emailing Asus but they haven't responded (actually I got a delivery failure :angry: ). I also found when trying to use the BIOS update utility that it told me that it didn't find an Asus motherboard! How the **** does that happen?! Something is royally screwed from what I can tell. I also touched the heatsink when it was reported at being 82C and it wasn't even warm. I am interested to find out what Asus will tell me (if I can ever get through), I am thinking about just RMA-ing the board back to newegg but damn that's a hassle considering I can't really afford the downtime...

Also does the P4 throttle down when it reaches (or thinks it reaches) certain temps? I?m trying to figure out why my DivX encoding is slow when I have all the settings set up for speed. I was also wondering where the thermal probes for the motherboard and CPU are located. The motherboard temp seems correct (30-32C) so I can?t figure out why the CPU is so messed up.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/113189-recommended-temp/#findComment-1333553
Share on other sites

Don't trust your motherboard!

If you're monitoring your CPU temperature with some sort of software utility that reads a motherboard sensor, beware. It's better than using a sensor stuck to a heat sink, but it isn't necessarily a lot better.

Socket A motherboards that can monitor CPU temperature usually have a probe behind the CPU itself, in the middle of the socket. If the probe's touching the back of the chip package, it'll pretty much tell you how hot the chip package is.

Unfortunately, the hardware that reads the probe output may or may not be reliable. People's hardware-monitor temperature readings sometimes change drastically when they update the BIOS version of their computer. The temperature, of course, has stayed the same; it's the calibration of the monitoring hardware that's changed.

And many behind-the-chip probes don't quite touch the CPU.

And probe readings are susceptible to changes in ambient temperature that soak through the motherboard.

A better way yet to monitor CPU temperature is with a thermal sensor inside the chip package itself. All current Intel CPUs have a thermal sensor, which better motherboards can read; the new breed of AMD "Athlon 4" processors apparently have an internal sensor as well.

Internal sensors aren't right smack dab in the middle of the CPU core, but they nonetheless give you a quite good idea of the chip temperature. They're still at the mercy of the monitoring hardware calibration, though.

http://www.dansdata.com/coolercomp.htm

Is it possible that the BIOS update that I did (to the latest version) screw up the calibration of the CPU sensor? I don't remember the temp prior to updating the BIOS though. :unsure: :unsure:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/113189-recommended-temp/#findComment-1333734
Share on other sites

Most newer Socket A motherboards read the cpu temps from the internal diode inside Athlon XP's older processors need a probe Athlon 4's haven't heard that name in a year or so. Odds are either you aren't getting full contact with the cpu heatspreader you forgot to remove the tape covering the thermal pad or you have a bad bios flash. On most motherboards the motherboard temp sensor is either located in between the pci slots or sometimes oddly inside the northbridge. The thermal probe or probably diode is located in the center of the socket. Another possibility is the heatsink bracket isn't holding the heatsink in right you might want to look at it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/113189-recommended-temp/#findComment-1336647
Share on other sites

Yeah that's what I was talking about.

How would I know if the HSF is not seated right?? When I installed it I tried jiggling it to make sure it was secure and it didn't budge and looked flat as far as I could tell.? If it was angled in any way it would move, correct??:unsure:ure:unsure:ure:

it would probably wiggle if it were not on right. the stock heatsink really latches down securely, so it should be relatively easy to tell if its on right or not. if it looks to be alright, then maybe your board just has a bad temp probe, but you cant really verify that without a measurement from somewhere else. if your computer is stable and everything is secured down, id say the board is reporting the temp wrong.

When I was locking down the HSF I could tell it wasn't seated right when I would try to move it slightly a corner would feel loose. Then I just pressed a little harder and everything clicked and when I tried to move it again it was solid and wouldn't budge. Since I've built it I haven't had any lockups or crashes and have been playing a fair share of WarCraft III in addition to some encoding. So I'm not really sure what's going on anymore, lol. I think I'll try contacting Asus to see what they have to say. I'm running the latest BIOS as well for that board.

edit:

Just emailed Asus and I'll see if they have anything to add. Is it possible that I somehow damaged the CPU probe during the installation of the HSF? The CPU and Mobo probes are separate right? The mobo temp is around 30C, which is about right I think. Damn I'm going nuts..:wacko:ko:wacko:ko:wacko:ko:

IIRC it reads it directly from the processor, so you shouldn't have to worry about damaging an external probe. Also if it's not even warm, are you sure it's not 80? F?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/113189-recommended-temp/#findComment-1336703
Share on other sites

Yeah that's what I was talking about.

How would I know if the HSF is not seated right?  When I installed it I tried jiggling it to make sure it was secure and it didn't budge and looked flat as far as I could tell.  If it was angled in any way it would move, correct?  :unsure:  :unsure:

it would probably wiggle if it were not on right. the stock heatsink really latches down securely, so it should be relatively easy to tell if its on right or not. if it looks to be alright, then maybe your board just has a bad temp probe, but you cant really verify that without a measurement from somewhere else. if your computer is stable and everything is secured down, id say the board is reporting the temp wrong.

When I was locking down the HSF I could tell it wasn't seated right when I would try to move it slightly a corner would feel loose. Then I just pressed a little harder and everything clicked and when I tried to move it again it was solid and wouldn't budge. Since I've built it I haven't had any lockups or crashes and have been playing a fair share of WarCraft III in addition to some encoding. So I'm not really sure what's going on anymore, lol. I think I'll try contacting Asus to see what they have to say. I'm running the latest BIOS as well for that board.

edit:

Just emailed Asus and I'll see if they have anything to add. Is it possible that I somehow damaged the CPU probe during the installation of the HSF? The CPU and Mobo probes are separate right? The mobo temp is around 30C, which is about right I think. Damn I'm going nuts.... :wacko: :wacko: :wacko:

IIRC it reads it directly from the processor, so you shouldn't have to worry about damaging an external probe. Also if it's not even warm, are you sure it's not 80? F?

I don't get it...

I am sure that there is flat contact with the CPU, there was nothing to peal off on the bottom, it was just a gray slab, and the heatsink is secured very tightly. The only thing I can tell is that the sensor is misreporting (C/F)...:wacko:: :wacko:: :blink:: :unsure::

post-13-1068078703.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/113189-recommended-temp/#findComment-1336790
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!