I want MMA fights.


Recommended Posts

Hey people..

over the last few months ive been training my muscles and revitalizing my old kick boxing training..

I am a jack of all trades but a master of none so I know dips and dabs of alot of other martial arts but I wanted to get into amateur MMA fighting obviously I spar on occasions with other fighters but that isnt a real fight its all friendly...

I can hold my own, take massive hits and I have good speed and weight behind me... I was just wondering if there were any MMA fighters here who would know where I would start I was obviously thinking I need a few more months working out my technique as its really rough at the moment due to being so long, but I thought I should start looking into it now so i have something to work towards.

edit: forgot to say... this is england, from what I am aware things like this are easier in america.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1131932-i-want-mma-fights/
Share on other sites

Ask other fighters and ask whoever runs the gym, or you could just use google and type in "MMA Training in myroom" seeing as thats ur location lol

yea i tried it in my room it just gets lonely :p I have asked the guys at the MMA gym i train at but they withhold info until you take more classes for a long time with them

yea i tried it in my room it just gets lonely :p I have asked the guys at the MMA gym i train at but they withhold info until you take more classes for a long time with them

Thats understandable, they are thinking about your safety i guess besides from the limited info you provided i see you only know how to fight on your feet no judo or take down defense like wrestling might be best to do more training than trying to dive in head first, kickboxing will only help you so far and taking a hit means nothing these days as one hit in the right place and everyone goes down. Im pretty sure any mma fighter will tell you to train for a long time and put in your dues before jumping in.

Thats understandable, they are thinking about your safety i guess besides from the limited info you provided i see you only know how to fight on your feet no judo or take down defense like wrestling might be best to do more training than trying to dive in head first, kickboxing will only help you so far and taking a hit means nothing these days as one hit in the right place and everyone goes down. Im pretty sure any mma fighter will tell you to train for a long time and put in your dues before jumping in.

you make perfect sense, but at the same time I kind of just want to go in and get started I rather take what I know put up a good fight and lose winning isnt important to me.

I know lots of other skills but only parts... I know some defensive judo, a tiny tiny bit of thai boxing, generic boxing and some wrestling holds and pins... obviously not enough to class my self as a fighter in any of them and its just moves I have picked up from training and sparring with people of other disciplines. I just think if I could get one MMA fight I can see what I need to work on ... when I friendly I learn so much of my mistakes and techniques that I think a real fight would do so much more for me even if its just one until I get better lol and bar fights dont count.

you make perfect sense, but at the same time I kind of just want to go in and get started I rather take what I know put up a good fight and lose winning isnt important to me.

I know lots of other skills but only parts... I know some defensive judo, a tiny tiny bit of thai boxing, generic boxing and some wrestling holds and pins... obviously not enough to class my self as a fighter in any of them and its just moves I have picked up from training and sparring with people of other disciplines. I just think if I could get one MMA fight I can see what I need to work on ... when I friendly I learn so much of my mistakes and techniques that I think a real fight would do so much more for me even if its just one until I get better lol and bar fights dont count.

This is the thing, while you admit you know "parts" they will of been training for years so know alot more and are more disciplined and im going to guess alot fitter seeing as your just getting back into it all. MMA is a great sport but also a violent one where injury can mean the end of a career or worse (not heard of a death yet but its always possible i have seen legs and arms broke though!) if they were to let people into a cage just because "they" thought they were ready it would mean there were alot more injury's not only that but it would give the sport a bad reputation (Safety first as Dana White says).

As for seeing what you need to work on thats whats sparing is there for oh and of cause friends and other gym members you can discuss what needs to be worked on, work together in slower motion and arrange to improve it. In the cage its fast paced and you woudlnt have a clue till you'd lost the fight or even were injured. So im sorry but im going to have to stick with the professionals on this one and say train more if its something you really want to do, dont forget if they break there arm they have money and can afford to be out of work if you break your arm and are unable to code can you afford it? Maybe you can, but im guessing it would put more train and stress on you than them lol.

This is the thing, while you admit you know "parts" they will of been training for years so know alot more and are more disciplined and im going to guess alot fitter seeing as your just getting back into it all. MMA is a great sport but also a violent one where injury can mean the end of a career or worse (not heard of a death yet but its always possible i have seen legs and arms broke though!) if they were to let people into a cage just because "they" thought they were ready it would mean there were alot more injury's not only that but it would give the sport a bad reputation (Safety first as Dana White says).

As for seeing what you need to work on thats whats sparing is there for oh and of cause friends and other gym members you can discuss what needs to be worked on, work together in slower motion and arrange to improve it. In the cage its fast paced and you woudlnt have a clue till you'd lost the fight or even were injured. So im sorry but im going to have to stick with the professionals on this one and say train more if its something you really want to do, dont forget if they break there arm they have money and can afford to be out of work if you break your arm and are unable to code can you afford it? Maybe you can, but im guessing it would put more train and stress on you than them lol.

haha it would be a very difficult few weeks if i broke a bone in my arm seeing as computing is my bread and butter, I will be trainning for another 6 months before I even try and set up a ring match and it will be a year before i could even get a match .. but it was just something I wanted to start looking into now ... to get me a started and aiming towards something.... im thinking of taking some one to one classes soon as I hate group trainning

haha it would be a very difficult few weeks if i broke a bone in my arm seeing as computing is my bread and butter, I will be trainning for another 6 months before I even try and set up a ring match and it will be a year before i could even get a match .. but it was just something I wanted to start looking into now ... to get me a started and aiming towards something.... im thinking of taking some one to one classes soon as I hate group trainning

Id be the same if im honest id want one on one time with someone rather than a group training it would sink into my brain better i feel plus you can ask more questions on how to improve the technique and what not. Ofc you can still do group training from time to time just to practise on other people and training styles im pretty sure thats what top fighters would do anyhow, as for an aim you can still aim to fight you just need to score one or two other goals before hand how to escape, stay safe and better fitness! (if u need that part).

Anyway good luc with it, MMA is a great sport imo love watching it =)

Id be the same if im honest id want one on one time with someone rather than a group training it would sink into my brain better i feel plus you can ask more questions on how to improve the technique and what not. Ofc you can still do group training from time to time just to practise on other people and training styles im pretty sure thats what top fighters would do anyhow, as for an aim you can still aim to fight you just need to score one or two other goals before hand how to escape, stay safe and better fitness! (if u need that part).

Anyway good luc with it, MMA is a great sport imo love watching it =)

just got a personal trainer ... should be starting sessions soon within next 2 weeks

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!