• 0

Is there a free software that can join Mpeg-2 videos without re-encoding?


Question

I use a DVD recorder to record shows from TV and I'm trying to edit out the commercials. I have many softwares that can snip out parts of the video and I use it to snip out the parts of the videos that I want and I would like to piece it together to make it commercial-free.

So let's say I record an episode of a TV show and the half-hour show goes something like this...

Beginning

Commercial Break

Middle

Commercial Break

End

So, I have many softwares that will clip the parts that I want. So, I clip the parts that I want, i.e. Beginning, Middle and End, because I don't want the commercials. However, I have three separate clips (Beg, Mid, End) and would now like to simply piece them together without re-encoding since it results in quality loss. I have tried many softwares, such as Mpeg2Cut2, and many of these softwares just screw up the video. It does a horrendous job! It will not piece together a video without causing any sort of weird side effect.

I don't understand. It's a simple thing.... I just want to join these mpeg videos together and make it one mpeg video! That's it!!

Is there any free software out there than can perform this simple thing without any problems?

Thanks!

Recommended Posts

  • 0

There is a thread on a similar topic here, but there is no polished solution posted. However, you could probably create your own script without too much hassle based on the information posted in the aforementioned thread, if you're so inclined.

  • 0

Im pretty sure you can copy them into one file copy /b this how I recall doing it in the past

copy /b snip1.mpg+snip2.mpg+snip3.mpg newfile.mpg

When I get a chance I can verify that -- but I thought you were going to go the digital route.. Converting the files to h.264 should not in any way degrade the quality, if it is - your doing it wrong ;)

  • Like 2
  • 0
  On 24/01/2013 at 17:35, BudMan said:

When I get a chance I can verify that -- but I thought you were going to go the digital route.. Converting the files to h.264 should not in any way degrade the quality, if it is - your doing it wrong ;)

It is.

And the digital route is WAY too time consuming. Takes over an hour to convert a 45 minute show to h.264. Formatting to DVD and burning will take less than 20 minutes....

And is this what you're talking about?

http://txpress.blogspot.com/2007/01/join-multiple-video-mpg-files-in.html

I just googled it now and saw that link. I can try it when I get home. I hope it's that simple.

  • 0

Well let me fire up my dvd recorder tonight and to a little testing of my own. So I can get mpeg2 file to work with.

But you could also just use the mpg files as your digital copy - burning it to DVD is the part I don't understand.

So did you try out the copy /b command..

edit: I have some titus and seinfeld dvd's -- might just grab an episode off those to do the test with so I don't have to bother spending the recording time on dvd recorder to get a file to work with. I doubt the older dvds are encrypted? So should be able to just copy the vob off and change convert it to h264.

  • 0
  On 24/01/2013 at 21:55, BudMan said:

Well let me fire up my dvd recorder tonight and to a little testing of my own. So I can get mpeg2 file to work with.

But you could also just use the mpg files as your digital copy - burning it to DVD is the part I don't understand.

So did you try out the copy /b command..

I'm not at home now. I'll try tonight.

I burn to DVD so I don't have to store on my hard drive and also, I can play the files on a DVD player. Extracting mpg files from formatted DVDs is very easy. So, I can always take the DVDs I burn and turn them back into video files in no time.

  • 0

Ok I just grabbed a vob off one of my titus dvds

Complete name : D:\testmpeg2\VTS_01_2.VOB

Format : MPEG-PS

File size : 1 024 MiB

Overall bit rate mode : Variable

Video

ID : 224 (0xE0)

Format : MPEG Video

Format version : Version 2

Format profile : Main@Main

Format settings, BVOP : Yes

Format settings, Matrix : Custom

Format settings, GOP : M=3, N=15

Bit rate mode : Variable

Maximum bit rate : 8 802 Kbps

Width : 720 pixels

Height : 480 pixels

Display aspect ratio : 4:3

Frame rate : 29.970 fps

Standard : NTSC

Color space : YUV

Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0

Bit depth : 8 bits

Scan type : Interlaced

Scan order : Top Field First

Compression mode : Lossy

Fired up handbrake - picked normal as the preset and 2 minutes later

post-14624-0-43354600-1359115481.png

Now have MUCH smaller file only 325MB vs 1024 MB of the VOB

Complete name : D:\testmpeg2\test.m4v

Format : MPEG-4

Format profile : Base Media / Version 2

Codec ID : mp42

File size : 318 MiB

Duration : 21mn 15s

Overall bit rate mode : Variable

Overall bit rate : 2 092 Kbps

Encoded date : UTC 2013-01-25 11:53:03

Tagged date : UTC 2013-01-25 11:55:25

Writing application : HandBrake 0.9.8 2012071700

Video

ID : 1

Format : AVC

Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec

Format profile : Main@L3.0

Format settings, CABAC : Yes

Format settings, ReFrames : 4 frames

Codec ID : avc1

Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding

Duration : 21mn 15s

Bit rate mode : Variable

Bit rate : 1 927 Kbps

Width : 720 pixels

Height : 480 pixels

Display aspect ratio : 4:3

Original display aspect ratio : 4:3

Frame rate mode : Variable

Frame rate : 29.970 fps

Minimum frame rate : 9.785 fps

Maximum frame rate : 29.970 fps

Standard : NTSC

Color space : YUV

Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0

Bit depth : 8 bits

Scan type : Progressive

Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.186

Stream size : 293 MiB (92%)

Writing library : x264 core 120

Encoding settings : cabac=1 / ref=1 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x1:0x111 / me=hex / subme=2 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=0 / me_range=16 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=0 / 8x8dct=0 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=0 / threads=6 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=3 / b_pyramid=2 / b_adapt=1 / b_bias=0 / direct=1 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=1 / keyint=300 / keyint_min=30 / scenecut=40 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=10 / rc=crf / mbtree=1 / crf=20.0 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=3 / qpmax=69 / qpstep=4 / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:1.00

Encoded date : UTC 2013-01-25 11:53:03

Tagged date : UTC 2013-01-25 11:55:25

Color primaries : BT.601 NTSC

Transfer characteristics : BT.709

Matrix coefficients : BT.601

As to quality - I am not seeing any loss in it.. Maybe I am not as tuned to video quality of DVD video at max 720x480 from the source resolution on my HD TV or my computer monitor that runs at 1280x1024 resolution?

Lets say there some loss in quality - at only 1/3 of the size.. I can live with it ;)

edit: BTW got me wanting my titus on my server - not sure why I had never bothered to rip it before. So fired up makemkv - which is using mpeg2 in the mkv container so they are HUGE.. But makes it real easy to pull off the episodes as titles and only grab the audio you want if there is other lang, commentary, tracks.

Then just popped those files into a handbrake queue. First 2 disks done without even really thinking about it. Just click a few buttons when I think about it as I go about my morning surfing, etc. Takes longer to copy the video off the dvd then it does for handbrake to convert them to smaller size and better format. I will get a few more of the dvds copied over before I head out to work - and then just let handbrake convert them while gone.

My point of this - is who really cares if takes 2 minutes or 20? Just queue it up and let run when your sleeping or away from the house, etc.

  • 0
  On 24/01/2013 at 17:35, BudMan said:

Im pretty sure you can copy them into one file copy /b this how I recall doing it in the past

copy /b snip1.mpg+snip2.mpg+snip3.mpg newfile.mpg

Ok, just tested it. The good news is, it joined the files. The bad news is that it had the same side effect as the other softwares I tried. I tried to remove the commercials from a 60 minute show. After I snipped the videos and joined them, the commercials that I removed are gone (which is what I wanted, of course), but the timer still clocks at 60 minutes!!! When I formatted it to DVD, it still clocks at 60 minutes. When I tried playing the DVD file on the computer, it plays fine but the timer just gets messed up because the video is less than 60 minutes, but the timer on the video is insisting it's 60 minutes. Now, when I tried playing on a DVD player, the player gets stuck on the edited parts. I hope I'm not confusing anyone, but I can't help it because it is a very confusing problem.

But long story short, this did not merge successfully. It merged, but it's obviously badly merged together since the timer got messed up and the DVD players freak out at the edited parts. Sigh! It doesn't look like this simple thing can be done. I'm just going to give up, leave the videos the way they are, and just add chapter stops after the commercial breaks. That way I can just press "skip" on the remote to easily bypass the commercials when I rewatch these videos.

  • 0

If the time is messed up - hmmm idx for mpeg is at the end of the file? So ok its possible that some stand alone player that does not reindex the file on load might have issues. You would have to reindex the file I would think

Stand alone players for DVD are old school ;)

I would think avidemux could prob reindex the file for you. Or prob mencoder -forceidx

  • 0

If you can live with mkv files mkvtoolnix can mux mpeg files and have a nice gui. Just add the first file and append the rest and they should play without issue. I didn't try with split files but i downloaded samples from here and they played fine in mpc-hc when joined.

You should also have a look at ffmpeg if you are not afraid to use the command line . Here are instructions for splitting and joining.

  • 0

He doesn't want to use any sort of modern container for his files, nor does he want to use a modern codec. He wants to write the files to DVD so he can play them in his dvd player.

Think of it of 1999, and he is partying there ;)

He says that converting the files to h264 messes up the quality of his recorded to a dvd files which then pulls off creates a menu for and then reburns to dvd. Problem he is having now if he edits the file to pull out the commercials he is left with 3 or 4 snips of video that he wants to rejoin. But the index would be off when done this way and standalone players are not going to reindex on the fly like many software players do to forgive the issues in the file.

So he needs to join them back together and create a new index for the now shorter file. I would assume ffmpeg would do that - but he doesn't want to spend any processing time on the file ;)

  • 0

Apparently you guys don't care about quality loss, but I do. Even if it's just a little, I don't like it. That's one of the reasons why I'd rather buy a movie on Blu-ray and why I upgrade some of my DVD movies to Blu-ray. I want to watch my movies and shows in the best quality I can.

And my friend, if you're insisting that DVD is out and h264 is in, you're wrong. BLU-RAY is the new thing!! And as far as I'm concerned, all Blu-ray players play DVDs. So as long as Blu-ray players are around, then my DVDs are playable.

So, if you want to "get with the times," then ditch h254 and buy Blu-ray instead. :rolleyes:

  • 0
  On 26/01/2013 at 07:29, BudMan said:

Stand alone players for DVD are old school ;)

My friend, everything today is old school. You buy one thing and few months later, something new comes out which renders your item obsolete, or "old school." And like I said, the new thing today is Blu-ray, not h264. Blu-ray delivers the BEST 1080p picture and audio quality. So, buy Blu-ray and ditch h264.

And I don't buy standalone players anymore. All my standalone players are my older players that I bought over a decade ago. Apparently, DVD players don't break down as easily as VCRs, so while all of my VCRs are gone, all my DVD players are still alive... even my 15 year old Sony DVD player.

  • 0

Dude Blu-ray is not the new thing today. It's only a matter of time until all media is digital on a hard drive on some server somewhere. It won't be too long until all physical media is obsolete.

After all what are the benefits of having Blu-ray over all your movies in a digital format on your computer hooked up to your TV? There isn't one. Not sure why you are moaning that digital formats provide worse quality than Blu-ray, because they simply don't. After all Blu-ray is just a DVD with a bigger capacity that allows for larger digital files (meaning better quality) to be put on them

  • 0
  On 26/01/2013 at 15:48, Ryano121 said:

Dude Blu-ray is not the new thing today. It's only a matter of time until all media is digital on a hard drive on some server somewhere. It won't be too long until all physical media is obsolete.

After all what are the benefits of having Blu-ray over all your movies in a digital format on your computer hooked up to your TV? There isn't one. Not sure why you are moaning that digital formats provide worse quality than Blu-ray, because they simply don't. After all Blu-ray is just a DVD with a bigger capacity that allows for larger digital files (meaning better quality) to be put on them

Physical media will not die. Blu-ray sales keep rising, which means it's a very successful format. Just because a few of you go all-digital, it doesn't mean everyone else it doing the same. And it's hard to go all digital because it makes it easy for people to copy and share files with others. With Blu-ray and DVDs, the formats are encrypted to prevent such a thing.

And people told me not to hook up a computer to the TV. Everyone told me to buy a media player instead. To be honest, a computer makes more sense because you can always install softwares to play any type of video file you want.

And yes, converting any file to another format will also result in quality loss, maybe not noticeable to you, but it's there. Just like MP3 files have lower quality than CDs.. yet people dance away listening to MP3s on their Ipod. Most people don't care, but many audiophiles will not listen to MP3s, only CDs, because CDs sound significantly better!

  • 0

No, CD's are not better quality than all MP3's. The problem is that there are a load of bad quality <100kbps MP3's out there that yes do sound awful. Better so many now are 320kpbs+ which sound considerably better than any CD will.

Not sure who told you not to connect your computer up to you TV, but all I can say is they obviously don't know what they are talking about.

Its hard to go all digital because of all the sharing? No, thats what makes it so easy!!

No physical media will never die completely, but it will get closer and closer. Blu-ray sales may be on a slight increase in sales, but not even close to the increase in digital sales or the uptake in streaming services like Netflix. Add to that the slump in DVD sales and physical media is on the downturn. Thats not the case for digital though. Not saying its all a good thing, but its happening.

  • 0
  On 26/01/2013 at 16:29, Ryano121 said:

No, CD's are not better quality than all MP3's. The problem is that there are a load of bad quality <100kbps MP3's out there that yes do sound awful. Better so many now are 320kpbs+ which sound considerably better than any CD will.

Actually, there is still some quality loss. I used to not be able to hear the difference, but I finally got convinced when I spoke to a few audiophile nuts. They made me listen to the difference on their high-end equipment and you can notice it when listening there. But on the average equipment that non-audiophile nuts own, you really can't hear the difference. And believe me, I call them "audiophile nuts" because they can hear the difference so well that they swear LPs sound better than CDs and MP3s that they actually still buy them.

  On 26/01/2013 at 16:29, Ryano121 said:

Not sure who told you not to connect your computer up to you TV, but all I can say is they obviously don't know what they are talking about.

I'm glad I can just do that because I have a laptop and a PC in port on my TV. I can just hook it up and enjoy the files. I know that there are some cheap media players that people referred me to, but after reading those reviews at Amazon, I can see that they are problematic and I'll just get what I pay for. In short, they're cheap for a reason. If I want something good and problem-free, I need to spend a couple of hundred dollars. At least a laptop is guaranteed to play ANY digital file without any issue. If I do encounter a problem, I can simply install a better software. A laptop is the most future-proof route than a digital media player, since a media player is limited.

  On 26/01/2013 at 16:29, Ryano121 said:

Its hard to go all digital because of all the sharing? No, thats what makes it so easy!!

Easy for you, but hard for the studios financially since people are not obtaining their movies legally. That is why studios are fighting to keep physical media alive.

  On 26/01/2013 at 16:29, Ryano121 said:

No physical media will never die completely, but it will get closer and closer. Blu-ray sales may be on a slight increase in sales, but not even close to the increase in digital sales or the uptake in streaming services like Netflix. Add to that the slump in DVD sales and physical media is on the downturn. Thats not the case for digital though. Not saying its all a good thing, but its happening.

What about 3D Blu-ray? Seems like that's another new thing and what has made my 2D HDTV and 2D Blu-ray player obsolete. If anything, 3D Blu-ray and 3D TVs are going to take over, not digital files. Frankly, the thought of 3D home entertainment makes me sick, but it's the new fad that I've been hearing about a lot lately!

  • 0

By the way, I need clarification here. Since you guys are telling me to ditch DVDs and go all-digital, does that mean I should not buy DVDs anymore? There are many DVDs out there (and more to come) that you can't find anywhere else. So, does that mean I should not buy them? Or are guys saying that it's ok to buy them, but just rip and convert them to h264?

  • 0

Definitely keep buying DVD's. They're not anywhere near gone yet and they are much cheaper at the moment. But yeah when you buy them, rip them to your computer using a good codec, and you should end up with your own home media centre if you hook it up to your tv.

Thats pretty much what I have going on at the moment. Bought a 2TB drive and everytime I buy a new DVD I rip it and shove it on their. I still buy a lot of cheap DVDs and the 2tb drive is pretty much full already, so I may have to buy another in the near future. It makes it so much easier for me though. Instead of trawling through all by discs. I just browse my whole library on my computer and hit play. I wouldn't say they are full HD quality, but thats only because they are DVDs. They still look the same coming out of my tv as they would playing on my dvd player.

  • 0

Good, that puts me more at ease. I'm a big classic movie and TV show fan and they're getting harder to find nowadays. It's a miracle that a lot of them made it to DVD, but sadly, I don't think they would get released on any other format, physical or digital.

  • 0

Just at a complete loss to how you think a conversion means loss of quality - comes down to how your converting it.. That dvd of your yours is just digital file on a optical media vs a digital file on a hdd or a ssd, or a br or a compact flash or whatever the next form of storage is.

You do understand that some of your BR are in h264 - br players must support 3 format h262 mpeg2, and h264 mpeg4 and smpte VC-1 and the producer of the br can use which ever one they want. If they go the mpeg4 avc or VC-1 route they can get about twice the run time on the same br single layer 25GB bd-rom.

I understand what your doing, I understand the recording to the dvd of your input, and even keeping this copy as backup. What I don't understand is the re burning to disk again.. When you could just use the digtial media file on larger storage and access it like a library vs having to swap in disks back and forth.

Your like the guy that didn't want to get away from floppy and go hard when hard could store so much more! ;) You have everything arranged in your stacks and stacks of floppies and could not understand that its much easier to just put all those files on 1 disk vs many and be able to access anything instant.

This is the point I have been trying to make the whole thread. Your file is digital on your DVD or on your BR, I am just suggesting that store then on one big disk vs a bunch of little ones. As to the container your mpeg be it 2 or 4 file is in -- how does that change the quality?? It DOESN'T unless you tell it to - if you want to continue to use mpeg 2 --- go for it. You just might want to put it in a different container - say mkv vs some container meant to be understood by standalone players.

The container can store the video or audio streams in whatever format or quality you desire. Now myself change over to mpeg4 vs mpeg2 because its a more efficient compression format. You do understand that mpeg2 is lossy compression as well.. mpeg4 is just more efficient at it than that older format.

If you loosing quality in converting the stream from mpeg2 to mpeg4 it in how your doing the conversion and what settings you pick for the new file. Sure if you pick a lower bitrate its quite possible to see loss of quality, not the process in general or the new format that is causing the loss in quality.

btw: I am a huge fan of the classics myself. I have few jack benny and burns and allen and some abbot and costello dvds I picked up on the bargin bin at walmart. Have then sitting here on my desk waiting to be ripped.. Because I sure an the hell am not going to go looking for these disks when I want to play them. Get up off my couch find the things, open up the container and then put them in some player then back to the couch, etc. When I can simply browse my library and click play on the file I want to watch ;)

And I have a growing collection of humphrey bogart films, some of which are not that good of quality because they were ripped from vhs copies that were recorded off tv. So yes I would be happy to pick them up in a remastered br if it was available, etc. But then I would rip it and put in my library for ease of access.

edit: Its been mentioned already I do believe but makemkv is one example of just changing the container. It pulls the mpeg2 stream and audio streams from your dvd and puts then in the mkv container. It doesn't alter the streams in anyway. Just puts them in a different container. If you think there is loss of quality in that process your not understanding the process.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Everyone seems powerless against Oracle's ownership of the JavaScript trademark by Usama Jawad If you've been involved in the world of web development at some point in your life, you're likely familiar with JavaScript (JS). Alongside HTML and CSS, it is one of the core technologies powering the web as we know it. However, what many don't know is that the term "JavaScript" has been the center of legal controversies for the past several years. This is because Oracle owns a trademark on the term, and people think that this is unfair. Almost the entire web development community agrees that Oracle has done very little historically to support or promote the development of JavaScript. The only reason that it owns the trademark is that Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems, which had previously acquired Netscape, the creator of JavaScript. This meant that trademark rights on the term transitively flowed through to Oracle. However, this angers the web development community, and especially those who work on the open-source side of things. They believe that this trademark ownership creates legal uncertainties, especially since Oracle can potentially sue anyone for using the term for commercial purposes. For example, you may have heard about conferences for various technologies, but you have never heard of a "JavaScript Conference", because Oracle doesn't really care about the technology and people who do likely don't have permissions to hold such an event. To take back control of the term for the benefit of the public, the creator of Node.js, Ryan Dahl, and the inventor of JavaScript, Brendan Eich, penned an open letter to Oracle to abandon the trademark and return it to the community. However, those efforts went in vain, so Dahl (who is also the creator of open-source JavaScript runtime, Deno) filed a cancelation petition against Oracle, claiming that the company had used fraudulent means to renew its trademark, the term is too generic to be trademark, and that the firm has actually abandoned it due to its inactivity in the space, so it shouldn't own the term anymore. While Dahl was backed by the open-source and web development community at large, the case has been dealt a blow as the Node.js creator has informed the public that his claim about fraudulent behavior has been dismissed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). Although Dahl says that he disagrees with the decision, he is not amending the claim, as that would delay the process for the other two claims even further. Image via Kevin Ku (Pexels) Dahl has emphasized that the heart of his petition is the other two claims, genericness and abandonment, and those still stand. He has noted that JavaScript is purely a programming language, not a brand or product of Oracle. Despite this setback, those following this legal battle should know that Oracle will have to respond to Dahl's claims in detail on August 7. Following that, there will be a discovery process that will kick off on September 6. Dahl hopes that by winning this case or by Oracle conceding defeat and releasing the trademark, no one will have to worry about trademark symbols, litigation, or licensing fears when using the name of the programming language. Over on Hacker News, where the forum thread regarding this topic has been gaining traction, the community has mostly voiced vehement support for Dahl's efforts but has expressed surprise over Oracle's continued stranglehold over the trademark, even though it seemingly does not benefit financially from it.
    • Mobapad Huben2 review, one of the first capacitive joystick controllers to release by Robbie Khan In 2024, I was lucky enough to have had early hands on with the world's first Tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) stick controller, the PB Tails Crush Defender. TMR promised better precision than hall-effect, better resolution and better polling rates. Both technologies use magnetism to relay the stick position with high levels of accuracy and no stick drift. Hall-effect is still the dominant technology, but TMR is fast taking its place. In the console world, first party controllers still use traditional potentiometers for the sticks, but a growing trend in the modding community has seen people replacing those sticks with TMR or hall-effect modules. These mods require soldering and calibration, so not a job for the average gamer. Since then, many other brands have released their TMR stick implementations into new controller models, my personal view, having seen what's out there now, is that TMR has matured into something quite excellent. I still game with the Defender, for example. Today I bring an early look at one of the first capacitive stick controllers to hit the market, the Huben2 by Mobapad. What is a capacitive joystick? What surprised me most about the Huben2 package was just how good everything looks and feels. I don't think photos do it justice, in the hands, the quality of the plastic and grips are all very good. There will be frequent comparisons to the GameSir Tarantula Pro here, since it has long been my personal benchmark thanks to it being an excellent all-round package with bags of customisation and very high quality construction. Let's check out the Huben2 in a bit more detail. Specifications Platforms Switch, iOS, Android, Windows, Steam Input modes Bluetooth, dongle, wired Polling rates Up to 1000Hz Sticks KSilver capacitive analogue Stick caps Removable silicone with metal necks for anti-friction Deadzones 0% Raw sensors Yes, activated via desktop/mobile app Triggers Hall-effect triggers with Omron microswitches in lockout mode D-Pad Omron mechanical switches with swappable cross/circle button face Shoulder buttons Tactile switches Accessory buttons Tactile switches ABXY buttons Omron mechanical switches Back buttons M1-M4, tactile switches Motion control 6-axis gyro control for PC and Switch Connections USB-C Macro/Turbo Yes Vibration ALPS HD Rumble RGB Power LED can be customised Construction ABS plastic Battery 1000mAh, 15 hours playtime eManual Link Release date July 2025 Price $79.99 (special offer) / £58.74 (special offer) Unboxing The packaging is quite nice, not that this matters much, but from the box to the contents inside, everything has a premium feel about the whole presentation and material quality. The protective hard shell case is very nice quality, the best I have laid hands on to date in fact, these must cost a fair bit to produce to this standard. Mobapad Huben2 carry case It's nice to see that both types of d-pad cap included, I never liked the circular cap found on other controllers, but here, with the Omron mech switches, this cap feels rather nice to the point I prefer how it operates compared to the traditional cross-type. The wireless dongle is 1000Hz and it is already paired to the controller out of the box, although manual pairing is quick and easy. The USB cable is high quality and braided, should you ever need to use it, though thankfully unlike some other controllers, the port on the controller is flush with the surface and not recessed, so any third party USB cable will work just fine. both grips have a rubberised layer that's comfortable and grippy, I am unsure as to how long these will last as in the past I have seen similar things start to peel away after a year of use: Mobapad Huben2 details gallery You may have noticed the switch toggles on the backside near each trigger. These lock the triggers into hair trigger mode which then actuates a mechanical microswitch under each trigger. Activating the lockout is easy and satisfying, but to revert back to analogue trigger mode requires quite a bit of finger force, more than I feel happy about as it requires more concentration and energy which means attention drawn away mid-gameplay. The top faceplate is swappable, though there are no alternative options to buy, yet, the included cover is double glazed with a top layer that's clear. The whole piece feels rigid and high quality again, though some may find the glossy top finish a bit annoying depending on how oily your hands get during heated gaming, because during those situations a matte textured surface offers better comfort and grip. You may have noticed that there are pogo pins on the underside of the controller, it is not clear if these are for charging or an attachment accessory as there is no documentation clarifying. We will have to wait and see what Mobapad has in store for this. Here is a video showcasing the sounds of the Omron mechanical microswitches, and let me just say, these switches are amongst the nicest feeling and sounding in combo that I have used on a controller yet. Performance & measurements I handed the pink one to my brother since he just got the Switch 2, he's pleased with the Huben2, everything seems to work fine, although it has to be said the HD Rumble is the weakest part of this controller. Whether on Switch or PC, the rumble feedback is not anywhere close to the HD Rumble rebound and depth of the motors featured on the GameSir Tarantula Pro. The Huben2's rumble feels and sounds more like a buzzing bee than nuanced haptics that can rumble low enough to satisfy the hiring action of a shotgun in Doom or Resident Evil. Even the act of running in a game feels a bit weak on the haptics front, meanwhile, the Tarantula Pro convincingly reacts to the patter of heavy running feet or jostling through rough surfaces in a game world. The capacitive sticks seem to react with precision, and the zero dead zone can really be felt in most games as even gentle touches to the stick result in movement, assuming the game being played has no developer implemented fixed-dead zones for controllers. Some games offer up the options to change this in the game settings, but most do not. I played extended sessions of GTA V Enhanced with no stick performance issues, though the trigger did prove to be a bit troublesome, more on this after the measurements... Mobapad Huben2 measurements (0% deadzone, raw sensor mode enabled) ... The triggers also come with zero dead zone out of the box, but internally the actuation doesn't register until the trigger has travelled quite a distance. This means that driving can feel a bit dead until the trigger has been pressed in further than you may be used to. Here is a GIF showing how much the trigger has to travel before the screen register an input of even 0.02% Other tests showed that whilst the capacitive sticks are largely excellent, there is processing/filtering going on when the sticks are moved very quickly or allowed to bounce back, a test I do with all controllers to check for filtering, take a look at this comparison versus the Tarantula Pro: Huben2 Tarantula Pro Notice how the indicator on the screen bounces back much slower on the Huben2, these clips were recorded on a 240Hz OLED monitor at 240fps, the final clip was slowed to 1/4x which then makes the differences clear. For the record, the Tarantula Pro has no noticeable filtering in in real-time, and the indicator overshoots to the opposite axis when the stick is let go, exactly as the physical stick is doing. This is something that Mobapad can fix with a firmware update, and i have passed my findings over to the team. At present, there is no way to turn off stick filtering in the apps or via button combos like you can on some other controllers. Software Configuration options are limited on the controller directly, so the phone or desktop app must be used to tweak things to preference. Mobapad's app is laid out nicely and I found no issues with connectivity, even over wireless on Windows. Here is a look at all of the tabs within it: The desktop app can be found on the Windows Store, or by searching Mobapad in your phone's app store. Conclusion The Huben2 is a good controller, its normal RRP is a little high for my liking having experienced all manner of controllers these past 18 months, but if you grab one at the discounted price, then it could be a suitable controller for you. Where it is missing some features, these could be added with a firmware update, such as button combos to disable the stick filtering which removes the latency on bounce back and snap-stick movements. Sadly, one area which I do not think can be fixed with an update is the trigger travel distance before actuation, it feels like this is part of the physical build rather than a sensor register in the controller firmware. Clarification from Mobapad is required to confirm this. The build quality is very good, the app on both mobile and desktop work well, the Omron switches sound and feel superb, and the accessories included are a welcome addition that competes the package. But package alone doesn't make a controller great, everything has to gel, and that includes features like customisation. I only have one small nitpick to make, and that is the silicone quality on the joystick caps. They are OK, but GameSir controllers have much better grip on the sticks thanks to adopting Sony's cap shape and near-identical quality of silicone. It is a shame that the Huben2 cannot remap the back buttons to keyboard buttons on PC, GameSir allows this in all recent releases from the past year, customisations are saved directly onto the controller so remaps are usable on other computers. The Huben2 only allows remapping the four back buttons to existing face buttons, and in my opinion, this is quite pointless. I never quite understood why this was so common with brands when these are PC controllers primarily. If a good discounted price is not possible, then a GameSir Cyclone 2 or later model would be a more suitable option offering more features, excellent TMR sticks which perform just as well as these capacitive sticks, and have no filtering applied to them, should this be an important deciding factor for you.
    • I had a G2 and it was a pretty good phone. I was disappointed to see LG exit the smartphone business.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Gromvar earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Dedicated
      BreakingBenjamin earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Hartej earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      TsunadeMama earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      shaheen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      163
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      107
    5. 5
      Som
      100
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!