Recommended Posts

Security implementations are in many places - awful.

The random thing is good practise, heck you can do it easier - set all PC passwords the same then change them remotely using a script which saves the passwords (unique for each machine) to an encrypted USB and once done - remove the USB!

Also I like that you're trying to check out about the security but remember, the kid might be breaking the law but unless you've got it written into the agreement that the kid has with you and local laws allow, it's illegal for you to keylog him.

Oh and just a reminder for ANYONE involved in ANYTHING like this - decrypting or attempting to decrypt SSL data or capture data sent over SSL [including keystrokes] is illegal in the UK and EU, not sure about america - and you will get in serious trouble if you attempt to use that as evidence as anything because the data could be confidential such as the user's credit card details.

Friday afternoon was spent changing the local admin passwords on the labs that the students have access to. We also set the HDD as the only boot device and locked down the bios with a stong password. This can be reset very easily with the jumpers on the motherboard, so now we are looking at locks for the cases.

Luckily with the security that was already in place(I've been at this job since Thanksgiving), the user's 'hack' was isolated to the local machine. Sure, he knows a local admin password, but we caught him in another lab trying a series of passwords and none worked since each lab has a different local admin password. So that policy was effective as well.

Thanks for all the input.

where do they save their documents?

smartshield http://www.centurion...martshield.aspx

have fun with breaking things...reboot they revert back, the downside..don't save anything to the c drive or do installs/updates with the it enabled. You can set specific times for auto updates to execute so that it unlocks.

So why would his account have access to windows system32? Are you saying he booted the recovery tools that are installed on the disk or did he just have access to the folder in the first place?

A known way to access the windows system32 folder is via startup recover and then using the notepad file browser, etc..

Can you just disable those from booting with something like

bcdedit /set {default} recoveryenabled No

bcdedit /set {default} bootstatuspolicy ignoreallfailures

I thought there was a way to remove them completely or not install them in the first place. Its been awhile since I had to play with this sort of stuff.

Normal account should not be able to access the windows/system32 dir, and if you prevent boot from media remove the option to get to the recovery tools that might be installed on the disk you should be able to still allow for sticky keys ;) While preventing this sort of attack.

edit: So curious is this a OEM sort of installation, custom image your dept deploys? is there a recover folder with a winre.wim file? Having the recovery tools on the HDD that anyone with local access could boot is going to allow for all sorts of nasty things to be able to be done. I would completely remove those features. Admins should have to either reimage the machine or boot their tools after knowing the bios password so they can alter the boot menu, etc. Yeah it can be pain -- but if you want to prevent this sort of thing, then some pain has to be felt ;)

However if you enforece bitlocker with the key being backed (with hardware TPM) up to AD and only recoverable from AD admins there is no way they can use any off the street tool to add thierselves as Admin.

This is only true if it?s TPM 2.0. TPM 1.2 key security is defeated, as it has had known vulnerabilities for years that allow attackers to extract stored encryption keys. Also, motherboards that have the TPM as a removable card suffer from Man in the Middle attacks that allow you to observe the key in transit when released to the system assuming measured boot thinks no changes have occurred. TPM 1.2 keys are only secure when used in conjunction with +PIN, +USB, or +Network Unlock.

The primary reason to use TPM 1.2 without two-factor authentication is for a measured boot.

As of yet I haven't encountered any devices containing a TPM 2.0.

See the response in this article and see if it helps

1. Consider a BIOS boot password

2. Consider an FDE PIN based system

3. Consider 2FA for interactive logon

4. With Windows consider domain auth (no cached credentials) for interactive logons

5. With Windows consider do not store LANMAN Hash

6. With Windows consider protect the SAM DB using SYSKEY

7. Consider Require Smartcard for interactive logon.

8. Or a combination of the above.

http://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/15031-How-to-Log-In-to-Windows-Without-the-Password.html

BM - he used the driver signing option at boot and broke Windows so that it would launch its own repair, from there he used notepad to open a file browser. His student account did not have access to the system32 directory.

Yes, the techs image the labs and do mass rollouts of the computers. And yes, you're right- more security = more pain. But it's for the chillren, right? I'll start looking at ways to disable the recovery feature. Thanks for pointing me in that direction.

I have been reading this topic with a lot of interest...you have to give the kid some credit for his ingenuity. But I have a couple of observations:

1. Since he reset the password for the local admin and not for domain (which is a big headache I admit)...how much trouble can he cause. Since it is local he cannot access domain shares, accounts, etc...

2. I love budman's last post to edit the boot process and prevent access the recovery console. Between that and disabling boot options within the bios you should be able to prevent this in the future.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I do trust Apple probably more than these other companies with certain data, but I also do think (and it has been demonstrated that) Apple pulls a lot of shenanigans and always has for a long time.
    • Does your iPhone support the latest iOS version? Here's the iOS 27 compatibility list by Aditya Tiwari It's that time of year when we get to know about the latest operating system updates for Apple devices. For iPhone, Apple previewed the iOS 27 update at WWDC 2026, where the company finally introduced an upgraded version of Siri. Apple typically supports iPhone models for up to five years. But it has been making exceptions in recent years (read iPhone 11). If you're wondering whether your iPhone is compatible with the iOS 27 update, here is the official list of devices: iPhone 17 Pro Max, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17, iPhone 17e, iPhone Air iPhone 16 Pro Max, iPhone 16 Pro, iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16e iPhone 15 Pro Max, iPhone 15 Pro, iPhone 15 Plus, iPhone 15 iPhone 14 Pro Max, iPhone 14 Pro, iPhone 14 Plus, iPhone 14 iPhone 13 Pro Max, iPhone 13 Pro, iPhone 13, iPhone 13 mini iPhone 12 Pro Max, iPhone 12 Pro, iPhone 12, iPhone 12 mini iPhone 11 Pro Max, iPhone 11 Pro, iPhone 11 iPhone SE (2nd generation), iPhone SE (3rd generation) So, you can download the iOS 27 developer beta on up to 31 different iPhone models. There has been no change to the list of supported iPhones since iOS 26. However, it will expand to include more devices when the iPhone 18 series arrives later this year. To download the developer beta on your iPhone, go to Settings > General > Software Update > Beta Updates. Here, select "iOS 27 Developer Beta" from the list of choices to get the new update. In addition to iOS 27, you can try the developer beta versions of macOS 27, iPadOS 27, watchOS 27, tvOS 27, and HomePod software 27 on your supported devices. iOS 27 comes with improved Liquid Glass, which you can adjust using a new transparency slider. Apple said during the keynote that iPhone apps now launch up to 30% faster, new photos appear in the Photos app up to 70% faster, and AirDrop transfers work up to 80% faster. The new update promises to improve performance on older iPhones by introducing a new CPU Scheduler that supports devices all the way back to the iPhone 11. While iOS 27 is supported on older iPhones, it goes without saying that they'll lack several features due to hardware differences. For instance, iPhone 14/14 Plus and older models come with a notch instead of the Dynamic Island. Similarly, Apple Intelligence features are supported on iPhone 15 Pro/Pro Max and later models.
    • The Radeon RX 9070 XT is right up there with the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
    • I don't know why someone said useless, but it does have that pesky kernel driver bundled, and it's in perennial turmoil. When it goes bad, it goes very bad, and it's impossible to predict when it will due to system differences. I know that they're in the middle of development for a major new version that will include a completely new driver, one that they expect will largely solve the problem, but that's a ways out and it's unproven at this point.
    • doesn't AdGuard let ads through that pay to be let through?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      jojodbn earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      132
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!