[OSx86] My first working OSX86 build!


Recommended Posts

I've been having thoughts about trying a Hackintosh build for quite a while.. and whilst I think my previous motherboard could have worked with some effort, to be honest I couldn't really get my head around DSDT's and all the other tweaks to make it work.

I decided the best thing would be to buy more compatible hardware so after a bit of research swapped out my existing setup for a Gigabyte GA-Z77-DS3H.. not only is it very compatible with Mountain Lion, it's also quite well priced and more than suits my needs. It was also a convenient time to move up from a Core 2 Quad to a Core i5 CPU..

I just spent the evening deploying Mountain Lion using the Unibeast / Multibeast method and couldn't be happier. Only had to do minimal tweaking (setting PCIRootUID=0 to actually get the installer up) and everything seems to be working as far as I can tell - though I haven't tried sleep / suspend or anything like that yet. Sound / LAN / video all seem fine.

I've done the build on a spare harddrive I had lying around - next need to experiment on deploying it to my normal boot drive and setting up Chameleon to boot Windows too... as I still want to play Battlefield 3! :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1133620-osx86-my-first-working-osx86-build/
Share on other sites

Gratz! I have been considering building a hackintosh for a while now. I currently have a late-2010 21.5" iMac, and want to upgrade. I checked out the latest tonymacosx "build" guide, and see that I can get a much more powerful unit going this way than buying a new iMac. In fact, I can build one much better than the upgraded iMac versions for 1/3 to 1/2 the price of said iMac. I guess the biggest question I have is, "will I be able to Boot Camp a hackintosh to run Windows? In my profession, I need access to both systems, in fact, I need Windows a little more than OS X. Have you tried Boot Camp yet on your build?

Tim

No - and I'm not sure that I would. As part of the Multibeast installation, you install a 3rd party bootloader called Chameleon which can handle other operating systems.. so it's that I plan to use as and when I try and get a dual boot system working.

I only ended up making a Hackintosh because Apple don't really make a system that appeals to me that costs anything remotely reasonable. I like the Mac Pro but it's not only hugely expensive but desperate for a hardware refresh.. and I'd like to have the option to upgrade bits and pieces in the system incrementally which rules out systems like the iMac. It's annoying :( I actually used to have an iMac a few years ago but again it was starting to get on a little bit and the graphics card really was not good enough.. I was able to sell and use the proceeds to pay for basically a brand new PC build that was quicker in every way. Of course barely any PC has as nice an enclosure / case as most Macs but that's the tradeoff I guess.

I can heartily reccommend the motherboard I got though - it's referenced in a lot of guides, and seems to run brilliantly in both Windows and OSX :) I think on reflection though an ATI based video card might be a better bet than an nVidia.

Well much to my surprise, even sleep seems to work just fine - which I didn't expect. I can't recommend this motherboard enough if you want to make a Hackintosh.

Now my only annoyance is my sound card - I have an Asus Xonar Essence STX which I bought because of the dedicated headphone amp on it. I love how it sounds but obviously it's completely unsupported in Mountain Lion so each time I decide to boot OSX, I have to shutdown, remove my soundcard, and enable the onboard soundcard - which sounds nowhere near as good.

I guess the only realistic solution is to ditch the Xonar and buy a USB DAC / headphone amplifier of some kind?

Amazing,

Unfortunately I have an iMac, was a gift for my home office and is getting outdated fast. I have not had the "want" to upgrade it, where-as, my Windows 7 / Linux machines are quite easy to upgrade as I go along.

A "Hackintosh" would solve this problem and on some level would be more realistic to my target audience if I could keep it running but I am not quite clear on Apples stance on this.

nice to hear that! if you have any questions, feel free to PM me about hackintosh... im doing this since tiger, so i kinda been through a lot of situations you guys may also face :)

Amazing,

Unfortunately I have an iMac, was a gift for my home office and is getting outdated fast. I have not had the "want" to upgrade it, where-as, my Windows 7 / Linux machines are quite easy to upgrade as I go along.

A "Hackintosh" would solve this problem and on some level would be more realistic to my target audience if I could keep it running but I am not quite clear on Apples stance on this.

Sadly I think it's pretty clear - it's against their terms of use for the product. But I don't see how it matters provided you actually buy a copy and then tinker with it however you want.. you're not going to be reverse engineering it, making money from it, trying to go to them for support, etc and I'd imagine from a legal point of view they have bigger fish to fry than chasing down random individuals on the internet who are trying to run their operating system.

Provided buying a copy keeps your conscience clear, then I say do what makes you happy.

Sadly I think it's pretty clear - it's against their terms of use for the product. But I don't see how it matters provided you actually buy a copy and then tinker with it however you want.. you're not going to be reverse engineering it, making money from it, trying to go to them for support, etc and I'd imagine from a legal point of view they have bigger fish to fry than chasing down random individuals on the internet who are trying to run their operating system.

Provided buying a copy keeps your conscience clear, then I say do what makes you happy.

I enjoy using my Mac Book Pro but to be fair I think I will stick with Linux as my desktop. Sounds more simple and they are about the same in terms of capability in the perspective of how I am using the devices.

Good luck! I had one once upon a time, but trying to update it was quite a painful experience. To be honest, I don't see much of a reason for building one now, since Apple barely even releases new GPU drivers for it's own systems... even if you do get it running, the one bright spot of a Hackintosh (aside from the price) ends up being a no show.

Also have this dual booting perfectly, off the same 128GB SSD, as my Windows 7 installation. I took a bit of time reading through various guides which involved getting stuck into some truely horrid partition editing, etc but in the end it was as simple as:

* Load Unibeast based MountainLion installer - make disk a GPT type disk rather than MBR, and split into two partitions - partition one was an HFS+ OSX partition and the other (as a placeholder) a FAT partition. Install MountainLion.

* Reboot and install Windows 7 - when choosing the partition select the FAT, which it'll moan about, and format it as NTFS instead. Finish the install and setup all the drivers if necessary.

* Reboot back into OSX and run through the Multibeast installer, including installing the Chameleon bootloader.

* Reboot again and marvel as your Chameleon bootloader gives you the choice of Windows os OSX disks to boot off.

I think I've reached home computing nirvana.. I now have the choice of fully functional OSX and Windows 7 on the hardware that I've chosen. Now I just have to decide if I want to cut up my Powermac G5 (2.5GHz Quad) case as an experiment in trying to put a PC in it... though I'm not quite sure I can bring myself to do that- so don't worry !! :)

even tough ML is the latest, SL was the best version I've ever used of OSX (not only talking about hackintoshes).

True dat! - I formatted my Hackintosh after a couple of weeks use of ML. I didn't feel the want to use it anymore. SL was by far the better version.

Indeed. I would probably have used Snow Leopard but from what I read it just wasn't quite as easy to Hackintosh, and support for Nvidia cards is a hell of a lot more ropey.. and as I have an Nvidia GTX 560, I figured Mountain Lion was my best option!

If for whatever reason I switch to an ATI card, I'd consider giving Snow Leopard a go though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!