Recommended Posts

As of recently it has been discovered that most routers expose UPnP to the outside world, which is not good at all. This allows attackers "from the internet" to open ports in your routers.

It is recommended you DISABLE UPnP in your router. Below is a test to see if your router is vulnerable. Steve Gibson, the creator of the very popular "Shields-up" which scans your IP for open ports in your router has recently added a test for the upnp vulnerability. Simply click the link then click the "proceed" button. You will then see a button for the UPnP test. Good luck!

The Test

https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2

  On 03/02/2013 at 18:08, warwagon said:

It is recommended you DISABLE UPnP in your router.

No; It is recommened that you get a good router. I have UPnP on my router enabled and

  Quote

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

So either I have a good router or the test sucks.

  On 03/02/2013 at 18:20, Detection said:

I have uPnP enabled but still fine (Expected as much with DD-WRT though)

Capture.PNG

Correct this is a route test, not a computer test.

It's only recommended to disable UPnP on your routers if they don't pass that test, which means they are exposing you to the outer world.

Just passed the test on three touters with UPnP enabled. Two of them are running DD-WRT.

post-203976-0-34939600-1359915937.png

I disable it anyway. The fact that UPnP, by design, lets any application communicate with the router and open ports should make any security conscious user uneasy.

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

Why would you disable uPnP anyways? It allows internal hosts to dynamically open ports like XBL or PSN for gaming and voice. Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use. Just keep your internal hosts clean.

  On 04/02/2013 at 08:12, trek said:

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

Why would you disable uPnP anyways? It allows internal hosts to dynamically open ports like XBL or PSN for gaming and voice. Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use. Just keep your internal hosts clean.

Yeah I agree with keeping uPnP enabled also.

I ran many different servers over the years, long time ago now, so I had many ports opened for access, and that site's port tests always showed me as being safe and secure.

All depends on what type of security you're running on your computers.

There should be no issue with running UPnP/NAT-PMP on your router if it's properly configured, I knew mine would pass this test from the start since it exposes it's configuration in a good manner (It only allows hosts on the 192.168/16 subnet to create a forwarding rule, and said rule has to point at the host that requested it, otherwise it's rejected), and shows what ports are forwarded on what protocol.

Never mind the fact that the firewall should reject outside communication before it even gets to the UPnP/NAT-PMP daemon anyway, if it isn't being blocked you have bigger issues.

"Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use."

So -- your talking a handful of ports at most.. UPnP is to allow unsolicted inbound traffic to get through your nat router. Traffic initiated by you, or in answer to your traffic is allowed.

Most people have no use of UPnP, it has been a nightmare since it was created -- who in their right mind thought, hey lets allow ports to be opened on your gateway/firewall without any sort of auth at all!!

And no UPnP should not be reachable via your public IP that is for damn sure.

  On 03/02/2013 at 18:32, warwagon said:

I disable it anyway. The fact that UPnP, by design, lets any application communicate with the router and open ports should make any security conscious user uneasy.

If you trust what's in your network and have the routers firewall up I don't see how it could.

^ the point is UPnP can remove your firewall settings. Without even a nod to you that its doing so, nor any sort of auth method to allow it.

There really needs to be some form of notification and auth to the mechanism - and then sure it would be a valid tool in opening firewall ports for the masses.

  On 04/02/2013 at 08:12, trek said:

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

Why would you disable uPnP anyways? It allows internal hosts to dynamically open ports like XBL or PSN for gaming and voice. Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use. Just keep your internal hosts clean.

It would allow any malicious program to actively contact your router, open whatever ports it wants, and then transmit data through those ports all without your knowledge.... pretty big security hole if you ask me.

  On 04/02/2013 at 14:14, BeLGaRaTh said:

Steve Gibson, the person who creates the most FUD on the internet with his crazy rants and observations!!!

I'm not going to argue that the fact that he is crazy, which he probably is, but he is also very smart. And Facts do not = FUD.

Are you up to date on this UPnP issue? The typical way UPnP works is, an active program on one of the systems on your network will contact the router and open ports for whatever program/service to pass data through. Sounds ok right, well there is an exploit on a TON of routers that allows that request to be made from the OUTSIDE over the WAN, so if you have one of these affected routers, anyone outside your network, can open up ports into your network using a little bit of packet "magic". It's a pretty big deal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, agree 100%!! It baffles me that so many people are so outspoken about hating Win11 but have taken zero steps towards trying out other operating systems. If you don't like the direction Microsoft is taking Windows, then staying on Windows 10 is only the short-term solution, clearly the long-term solution is to find an OS you prefer. Let's be honest about two things...Windows 10 was FAR from perfect, it makes many of the same offenses that 11 does, but maybe to a lesser degree. Also, if anyone is holding out hope that Windows 12 will be some kind of return to the good-old-days, they are being extremely naive. What will end up happening is they will get dragged along to W11 once W10 support fully ends (and they realize 10 IoT isn't what they thought it was), just like they got dragged from Windows 7 to 10. Then start the cycle over, they will figure out how to make W11 work the way they want it to and will start complaining about how bad W12 is.
    • only works for 1 microsoft account . im on rp channel and have 2 pcs with the same microsoft account, i pc got it the other one did not
    • Your first comment about one needing to send all their data to Microsoft's "cloud" to continue Windows 10 support was of course ridiculous but I can't disagree here. I am not sure why the OP would wait to switch to Linux if their Mom just uses a browser as she can use the same one with Linux. Why would she care what OS is running? Install /configure Linux Mint or Ubuntu LTS and almost no maintenance really.
    • Seagate Exos 20 TB BarraCuda 16 TB 7200 RPM CMR hard disk drives are limited-time deals by Sayan Sen Currently, there are some great sales on SSDs, in particular, NVMe M.2 ones, like this SK hynix P41 Platinum P41. However, if you are in the market for a hard disk drive (HDD), then Seagate has you covered. That is because two high-capacity drives, the Exos X20 20TB and the BarraCuda 16 TB are currently at great prices (purchase links down below). Since both of them are high capacity models, they are based on CMR or Conventional Magnetic Recording technology which is typically great for robust use cases like on NAS or (media) home servers and similar such scenarios. However, the Exos is enterprise-grade quality so it is definitely what you would want for 24x7 usage, but the BarraCuda can also serve pretty well but will be a better option for backup purposes. The Exos X20 promises power-on hours of 8760 per year, while the BarraCuda claims 2400. The latter comes with double the DRAM cache, though with 512 MB of it, while the former has 256 MB, but it should still be plenty. In terms of data transfer speed, Seagate promises up to 285 MB/s (272 MiB/s) from the Exos X20 and the BarraCuda is rated for up to 190 MB/s. These are the maximum sustained data transfer rates for the two drives. Since the Exos X20 is an enterprise-class product Seagate does disclose its random performance throughput, which is 168 IOPS for reads and 550 IOPS for writes, respectively. While the BarraCuda's randoms are not specified it is expected to be lower and to compensate, it packs double the DRAM cache. Get the HDDs at the links below: Seagate Exos X20 ST20000NM007D 20TB SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive: $379.00 + $50 off with promo code SACET2372 => $329.00 (Newegg US) Seagate BarraCuda ST16000DM001 16TB SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Drive: $194.99 (Newegg US) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why do you think the writing is on the wall? Tesla continues to have the highest selling models on the planet, and they continue to grow on that despite their junk reliability rating. I'm not going to buy one because of the continued build quality issues (and lack of Carplay), but I appreciate that they're the best player in an EV market that is massively lacking in infrastructure and affordability. Besides the EV technology needing to eventually outpace gasoline, self-driving technology is undoubtedly going to be the future. It's not going to happen tomorrow and not even in 10 years, but within our lifetimes, most cars on the road will be self-driving. That's the only way to solve the issue of a million deaths on the road. Waymo is using technology that's simply too expensive, which means it has to charge high fares. Tesla is going to blow past them with their ~$40k car and further yet when they release that weird looking 2-seater. Pretty soon Nvidia is going to be a market player, Amazon will be a player, and possibly the other 20+ startups that are working on a vehicle. I'd like to revisit this in a year and see how the market looks. I'm willing to bet there will be a huge increase of driverless cars on the road, and I doubt that Waymo is going to be the majority of them. Waymo isn't profitable for Google, so it's entirely possible the plug gets pulled as soon as several players leave them in the dust.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      DrRonSr earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Sharon dixon earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Parallax Abstraction earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      956400 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidfegan earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      616
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      229
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      167
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      161
    5. 5
      Xenon
      142
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!