Recommended Posts

As of recently it has been discovered that most routers expose UPnP to the outside world, which is not good at all. This allows attackers "from the internet" to open ports in your routers.

It is recommended you DISABLE UPnP in your router. Below is a test to see if your router is vulnerable. Steve Gibson, the creator of the very popular "Shields-up" which scans your IP for open ports in your router has recently added a test for the upnp vulnerability. Simply click the link then click the "proceed" button. You will then see a button for the UPnP test. Good luck!

The Test

https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2

  • Like 4
  On 03/02/2013 at 18:08, warwagon said:

It is recommended you DISABLE UPnP in your router.

No; It is recommened that you get a good router. I have UPnP on my router enabled and

  Quote

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

So either I have a good router or the test sucks.

  On 03/02/2013 at 18:20, Detection said:

I have uPnP enabled but still fine (Expected as much with DD-WRT though)

Capture.PNG

Correct this is a route test, not a computer test.

It's only recommended to disable UPnP on your routers if they don't pass that test, which means they are exposing you to the outer world.

Just passed the test on three touters with UPnP enabled. Two of them are running DD-WRT.

post-203976-0-34939600-1359915937.png

I disable it anyway. The fact that UPnP, by design, lets any application communicate with the router and open ports should make any security conscious user uneasy.

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

Why would you disable uPnP anyways? It allows internal hosts to dynamically open ports like XBL or PSN for gaming and voice. Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use. Just keep your internal hosts clean.

  On 04/02/2013 at 08:12, trek said:

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

Why would you disable uPnP anyways? It allows internal hosts to dynamically open ports like XBL or PSN for gaming and voice. Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use. Just keep your internal hosts clean.

Yeah I agree with keeping uPnP enabled also.

I ran many different servers over the years, long time ago now, so I had many ports opened for access, and that site's port tests always showed me as being safe and secure.

All depends on what type of security you're running on your computers.

There should be no issue with running UPnP/NAT-PMP on your router if it's properly configured, I knew mine would pass this test from the start since it exposes it's configuration in a good manner (It only allows hosts on the 192.168/16 subnet to create a forwarding rule, and said rule has to point at the host that requested it, otherwise it's rejected), and shows what ports are forwarded on what protocol.

Never mind the fact that the firewall should reject outside communication before it even gets to the UPnP/NAT-PMP daemon anyway, if it isn't being blocked you have bigger issues.

"Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use."

So -- your talking a handful of ports at most.. UPnP is to allow unsolicted inbound traffic to get through your nat router. Traffic initiated by you, or in answer to your traffic is allowed.

Most people have no use of UPnP, it has been a nightmare since it was created -- who in their right mind thought, hey lets allow ports to be opened on your gateway/firewall without any sort of auth at all!!

And no UPnP should not be reachable via your public IP that is for damn sure.

  On 03/02/2013 at 18:32, warwagon said:

I disable it anyway. The fact that UPnP, by design, lets any application communicate with the router and open ports should make any security conscious user uneasy.

If you trust what's in your network and have the routers firewall up I don't see how it could.

^ the point is UPnP can remove your firewall settings. Without even a nod to you that its doing so, nor any sort of auth method to allow it.

There really needs to be some form of notification and auth to the mechanism - and then sure it would be a valid tool in opening firewall ports for the masses.

  On 04/02/2013 at 08:12, trek said:

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

Why would you disable uPnP anyways? It allows internal hosts to dynamically open ports like XBL or PSN for gaming and voice. Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use. Just keep your internal hosts clean.

It would allow any malicious program to actively contact your router, open whatever ports it wants, and then transmit data through those ports all without your knowledge.... pretty big security hole if you ask me.

  On 04/02/2013 at 14:14, BeLGaRaTh said:

Steve Gibson, the person who creates the most FUD on the internet with his crazy rants and observations!!!

I'm not going to argue that the fact that he is crazy, which he probably is, but he is also very smart. And Facts do not = FUD.

Are you up to date on this UPnP issue? The typical way UPnP works is, an active program on one of the systems on your network will contact the router and open ports for whatever program/service to pass data through. Sounds ok right, well there is an exploit on a TON of routers that allows that request to be made from the OUTSIDE over the WAN, so if you have one of these affected routers, anyone outside your network, can open up ports into your network using a little bit of packet "magic". It's a pretty big deal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This is what I assumed would happen back when the rumors started. A new tab on Instagram for your text feed...
    • I agree - it's Cerebras power. Funny how Mistral isn't listed for that provider on OpenRouter despite Mistral being on OpenRouter. Edit: Ah, Mistral is of course their own provider on OR... Which probably in turn uses Cerebras. It's just that you don't get to it directly via OR.
    • I’m all for autonomous taxis. In my rural area a car is vital for work, socialising and appointments. Public transport is almost non-existent, with only two buses a day and none on weekends. The roads are narrow, unlit B roads with no pavements, so walking or cycling is unsafe. If you cannot drive, you depend on lifts or expensive taxis. City politicians / Gov keep making car ownership harder: higher road tax, soaring insurance because of repair costs and parts delays, and ever-rising fuel prices. A single mistake, such as a shaky cyclist overtake or getting trapped in a yellow box due to badly placed traffic lights at a roundabout and someone pulling out in front, can cost you your licence. They also push everyone toward electric vehicles, which do not work here. Many houses have no driveway and due to historic protection rules/laws cant add one, and you cannot run charging cables over the few bits of pavement we do have. Driving elsewhere to charge would also hurt the few local businesses left and act as a hidden tax on rural life as its more expensive to charge away from home. That’s why an on-demand, self-charging automated taxi service would be perfect for people here.
    • You can get deeper bass from your Polk soundbar with this $99 wireless subwoofer deal by Sayan Sen JBL and Samsung are still selling their soundbars with wireless subwoofers at great prices at the moment. The former has its BAR 1000 and BAR 700 models at their lowest, which the latter has the Q900F, Q800F, and Q600F, at least prices. If, however, you already have a soundbar, like the Polk Audio React, say, then you can add a subwoofer and get deeper bass; and now is the best time to pick one up as the React wireless sub is on sale for just $99 (purchase link down below). Unlike what some may feel like, a subwoofer is not there to make the bass louder, well technically yes, but in the way that makes your system boom more, that's what is known as the "boomy bass" and that is not something desirable, although some do like it. Instead, the subwoofer is supposed to augment the low end of your main speakers such that the bass/sub-bass from the subwoofer naturally blends with your main speaker's mid-bass/bass. The React subwoofer does not list too many spec details but Polk Audio claims that it can go down to 25 Hz. The unit comes with a high excursion long throw 7 inch bass driver and even with high excursion (high Xmax), it is never easy for a 7 inch driver to dig so deep. Since Polk does not quite disclose the SPL (sound pressure level) of the product at this 25 Hz frequency, it is probably safe to say that the dB output in this deep bass range is going to be much lower than its average SPL at frequencies like the 40-80 Hz spectrum. It is worth noting that most of the music actually lies above the 30 Hz range and thus if you are a music listener, the low output below 30 Hz won't even be noticeable. For movies, this sub should deliver plenty of oomph, and you will only miss the deepest of rumbles, but for just $99, can you even complain on missing out the lowest octaves? Polk React subwoofer rear view showing IO panel Get the Polk React 7 inch subwoofer at the link below: Polk Audio React 7" Wireless Subwoofer - Bass Adjust EQ, Amazon Alexa Compatible: $99.00 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US) (MSRP: $199.00) You can also check out other subwoofer options on Amazon at this link. This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Just merge it with Instagram already... Meta having two platforms with overlap was a bad business decision.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Stokenking earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Kevin Jones earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Kevin Jones earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      henryj earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      henryj earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      527
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      270
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      199
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      190
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      137
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!