Recommended Posts

As of recently it has been discovered that most routers expose UPnP to the outside world, which is not good at all. This allows attackers "from the internet" to open ports in your routers.

It is recommended you DISABLE UPnP in your router. Below is a test to see if your router is vulnerable. Steve Gibson, the creator of the very popular "Shields-up" which scans your IP for open ports in your router has recently added a test for the upnp vulnerability. Simply click the link then click the "proceed" button. You will then see a button for the UPnP test. Good luck!

The Test

https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2

  On 03/02/2013 at 18:08, warwagon said:

It is recommended you DISABLE UPnP in your router.

No; It is recommened that you get a good router. I have UPnP on my router enabled and

  Quote

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

So either I have a good router or the test sucks.

  On 03/02/2013 at 18:20, Detection said:

I have uPnP enabled but still fine (Expected as much with DD-WRT though)

Capture.PNG

Correct this is a route test, not a computer test.

It's only recommended to disable UPnP on your routers if they don't pass that test, which means they are exposing you to the outer world.

Just passed the test on three touters with UPnP enabled. Two of them are running DD-WRT.

post-203976-0-34939600-1359915937.png

I disable it anyway. The fact that UPnP, by design, lets any application communicate with the router and open ports should make any security conscious user uneasy.

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

Why would you disable uPnP anyways? It allows internal hosts to dynamically open ports like XBL or PSN for gaming and voice. Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use. Just keep your internal hosts clean.

  On 04/02/2013 at 08:12, trek said:

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

Why would you disable uPnP anyways? It allows internal hosts to dynamically open ports like XBL or PSN for gaming and voice. Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use. Just keep your internal hosts clean.

Yeah I agree with keeping uPnP enabled also.

I ran many different servers over the years, long time ago now, so I had many ports opened for access, and that site's port tests always showed me as being safe and secure.

All depends on what type of security you're running on your computers.

There should be no issue with running UPnP/NAT-PMP on your router if it's properly configured, I knew mine would pass this test from the start since it exposes it's configuration in a good manner (It only allows hosts on the 192.168/16 subnet to create a forwarding rule, and said rule has to point at the host that requested it, otherwise it's rejected), and shows what ports are forwarded on what protocol.

Never mind the fact that the firewall should reject outside communication before it even gets to the UPnP/NAT-PMP daemon anyway, if it isn't being blocked you have bigger issues.

"Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use."

So -- your talking a handful of ports at most.. UPnP is to allow unsolicted inbound traffic to get through your nat router. Traffic initiated by you, or in answer to your traffic is allowed.

Most people have no use of UPnP, it has been a nightmare since it was created -- who in their right mind thought, hey lets allow ports to be opened on your gateway/firewall without any sort of auth at all!!

And no UPnP should not be reachable via your public IP that is for damn sure.

  On 03/02/2013 at 18:32, warwagon said:

I disable it anyway. The fact that UPnP, by design, lets any application communicate with the router and open ports should make any security conscious user uneasy.

If you trust what's in your network and have the routers firewall up I don't see how it could.

^ the point is UPnP can remove your firewall settings. Without even a nod to you that its doing so, nor any sort of auth method to allow it.

There really needs to be some form of notification and auth to the mechanism - and then sure it would be a valid tool in opening firewall ports for the masses.

  On 04/02/2013 at 08:12, trek said:

THE EQUIPMENT AT THE TARGET IP ADDRESS

DID NOT RESPOND TO OUR UPnP PROBES!

Why would you disable uPnP anyways? It allows internal hosts to dynamically open ports like XBL or PSN for gaming and voice. Without it you'd have to manually open every single port those services and similar ones use. Just keep your internal hosts clean.

It would allow any malicious program to actively contact your router, open whatever ports it wants, and then transmit data through those ports all without your knowledge.... pretty big security hole if you ask me.

  On 04/02/2013 at 14:14, BeLGaRaTh said:

Steve Gibson, the person who creates the most FUD on the internet with his crazy rants and observations!!!

I'm not going to argue that the fact that he is crazy, which he probably is, but he is also very smart. And Facts do not = FUD.

Are you up to date on this UPnP issue? The typical way UPnP works is, an active program on one of the systems on your network will contact the router and open ports for whatever program/service to pass data through. Sounds ok right, well there is an exploit on a TON of routers that allows that request to be made from the OUTSIDE over the WAN, so if you have one of these affected routers, anyone outside your network, can open up ports into your network using a little bit of packet "magic". It's a pretty big deal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Wait, they're training their models in the cloud? I thought they had in-house Nvidia Blackwell powered data centers for training purposes.
    • I find it shocking you would claim that Tesla's self-driving is as good as Mercedes given the actual facts with fatalities (Tesla being involved in 53$ of all fatalities) https://www.craftlawfirm.com/a...data/#accidents-per-company Part of the problem is the CEO too making wild claims about FSD when the system actually requires human supervision at all times, which then can be blamed on the ignorance of the driver. In my opinion both Tesla and the driver are at fault. I've only been in a Tesla once (as a passenger) where "FSD" was activated, and the driver only did it for a few miles and was ever ready to take back control. The Tesla owner was also fully aware that FSD was in his opinion not safe enough to be trusted without human intervention and supervision.
    • iOS 26 Photos app: What's good and what's bad in the latest update by Aditya Tiwari Apple just announced the iOS and iPadOS 26 update for various supported iPhone and iPad models. After you get past the limelight of Liquid Glass and the new naming, you'll realize the update has several features and changes to offer. Let's talk about the redesigned Photos app on iOS 26 and what the hands-on experience feels like based on the first developer beta release. It's the second year in a row when Apple has made considerable changes to the Photos app. Last year, Apple killed its tabbed interface and replaced it with a single scrollable view that displays the Library at the top, followed by various Collections. The idea of giving too much too soon didn't work for the users, and the Photos app possibly attracted more haters than lovers. Apple realized that users weren't happy with the layout and took a U-turn this time. The revamped Photos app on iOS 26 brings the tabbed interface back. You will find two tabs this time in the main view: Library and Collections. The Library tab displays photos and videos in the same old grid layout you have been seeing for years now. As you scroll to view more photos, the Library and Collection buttons morph to reveal the "Years," "Months," and "All" tabs, which you can use accordingly. All of the buttons and options have received the glass treatment, and Apple has also rearranged some elements. For instance, the "View Options" button has moved from the bottom left to the top right corner near the "Select" button. The "Search" button now sits in the bottom right corner of the Photos app for easy access, particularly useful when using the iPhone with one hand. For comparison, this is how options in the Photos app looked on iOS 18. A highlight of the updated photos app is a feature called Spatial Scene. When you open an image in the app, you can tap on the Spatial Scene button at the top-right to transform the image into its 3D self. Once the processing is done, you can tilt your iPhone in different directions to experience the 3D effect. The feature works for new and old images alike, even the ones you clicked years ago. It doesn't work for videos and screenshots captured on the device. Moving on to the Collections tab, its default view displays different categories, such as Memories, Pinned, Albums, People, Shared Albums, and more, in a list that you can reorder according to your preference. You can tap on any category name to reveal the collections inside or tap the arrow next to it to display the same in a drop-down interface. You can customize the look and feel of the Collections tab using the three-dot menu at the top. It reveals two other layout options, as well as options to show, collapse, or reorder all the Collections categories in a single tap. You can also reorder the categories using the button present at the bottom of the Collections tab. Thanks to the collapsible nature of the Collections categories, the iOS 26 Photos app doesn't feel cluttered like its previous version. One useful thing to note is that the Photos app remembers the categories you expand in the Collections tab. In other words, if you expand just one (or more) category and collapse the rest of them, the Collections tab will stay that way even if you re-open the Photos app. Speaking of memory, the Photos app can also remember whether you were in the Library tab or the Collections tab when you last used the app. What's wrong with the new Photos app Apple's Liquid Glass-inspired Photos app has brought back the old familiar interface for users. However, it says goodbye to some of the good things Apple introduced in the last version. The single-scroll interface of the Photos app on iOS 18 made it easier to access collections like Screenshots and Videos. You could hide screenshots from the main Library view but quickly access them through a collection pinned just below it. Previous versions of the Photos app displayed the sync progress at the bottom of the Library. That information was hidden behind the profile picture icon on iOS 18. Now, with the latest update, you need several clicks to check whether your latest photos and videos are synced to your iCloud account because the profile picture icon is now a part of the Collections tab. Perhaps Apple chose to hide it away, as few people were bothered by its existence. However, the small feature was quite handy for users who had unstable internet connections. There is some indication, though, that the profile icon displays a progress bar and a yellow dot to inform about an unfinished sync process. On a side note, an early beta version of the iOS 18 Photos app allowed users to swipe right or left on the Library view to access different collections. The feature would have been quite helpful if it hadn't been cut, at least for users who want to access their Utilities, Media Types, Screenshots, and other collections quickly. It could have been made optional in the Photos app. That said, iOS 26 is still in its development phase, and the Photos app might add or remove features as more beta releases arrive. Apple is expected to push the first public beta sometime in July. You can try out the app now by installing the developer beta; however, keep in mind that the build may be unstable and surface unexpected bugs.
    • I don't have a problem with the Chromium backend, if fact I would prefer it over the Gecko backend, just as long as Firefox has the flexibility and customisation that it's got now, which is far better than Chrome. In any case, I think Mozilla continued backing of the Gecko engine is going to run them out of business, and I wonder how little market share they need to have for that realisation to set it. Whether we like it or not, the Chromium backend won, it overall performs better and is more of a standard, being that it's open source, I see no reason for Firefox to not adopt it, especially considering almost everyone else did. Either way, I think the days are numbered for Firefox, so Mozilla likely need to do some soul-searching if they want to survive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Posting Machine
      David Uzondu earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • One Month Later
      Stokenking earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Kevin Jones earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Kevin Jones earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      henryj earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      265
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      198
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      188
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      137
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!