Is it worth buying official ink cartridges?


Recommended Posts

Hi,

We're looking to replace our print cartridges and came across this page: http://www.cartridgesave.co.uk/ink-cartridges/HP/Officejet-4500.html

The recycled inks not only work out much cheaper per page, I also like the idea of recycling cartridges for environmental reasons

My main concern though, is whether or not I will ruin my printer - does anyone have experience in using recycled cartridges? How did you find it?

Thanks

I doubt it will ruin your printer. The company I used to work for used recycled ink jet cartridges instead of official HP ones. They worked just fine with the exception of the occasional one that would leak ink every where when you pulled the protective cap/film off. But for the price (and we was always able to get the bad ones replaced for free) its worth it.

But we didn't have color printers, I'd imagine color quality will vary.

Depends on what you print, legal documents or documents where you need quality id say so for originals, for homework and bits and bobs id say refills.

Only thing is it WILL void any warranty you have left on the printer so if it's a semi old one you've got nothing to lose.

Sometimes its cheaper to go get your own cartridge refilled. Tons of places do it, including Costco (if you happen to live near one in the UK).

All you do is drop off your own ink cartridge and they'll fill it up within the hour. Cost over here in the US (might be slightly different in the UK) is like $9 for the color, $8 for the black.

The quality? Well I've been using the same cartridge for my HP photosmart for at least a year now (get it refilled at Costco) and honestly stuff I print still looks exactly like it should.

Never had much luck with DIY refill kits or third party carts, but maybe it's just my particular printer being finicky too.

There's cases where buying the same printer new is cheaper than a colour cartridge.

Heh yea, I've done that a couple of times for my daughter's printer.. it's literally cheaper to just buy a new one. That's just screwed up.

I haven't bought ink cartridges in several years. In fact I don't remember when the last time I bought new cartridges.

Locally, we have a Goodwill Computer recycle store. I can go there and find new cartridges in their original boxes for $1 each. This past week I bought 4 new cartridges for my HP printer for $3.00. She only charge me $3 for 4 cartridges. The cartridges I bought were # 56, 57, 58, 59 for HP printers. You might see if there is a Goodwill Computer recycle store in your area. I believe they get them corporations donating large quantities of computer equipment and supplies. Also they don't always have the ones in stock you may need so go by there whenever near their store.

My experience of cheapy refill cartridges:

* From brand new report themselves to be about half empty already

* Dry up VERY quickly

* Clogg up your print heads

* Nowhere near as vibrant

* Had a few that simply just wouldn't print

* Ink has an odd smell about it

Again, these are just my own experiences - but I would much rather pay for OEMs

  • Like 2

I've had problems with the refills like leaking, low quality ink or the printer simply refusing to accept refilled carts. The mess and hassle of filling them isn't really worth the trouble in my opinion. I'm done with inkjets myself though, for printing documents laser printers are much higher quality and more economical and for photos you get higher quality prints for less money by just using a kiosk or ordering prints online.

  • Like 2

The only way non oem ink can do any real damage to a printer is to clog the print head. on most HP printers the print head is part of the cartridge (363, 364, 10 and 80 are the exceptions if i remember correctly) so if the head gets damaged just buying a new cartridge will fix it.

You do have to get a good quality ink, so don't buy the cheapest and there is no such thing as a universal inkjet ink.

The only way non oem ink can do any real damage to a printer is to clog the print head. on most HP printers the print head is part of the cartridge (363, 364, 10 and 80 are the exceptions if i remember correctly) so if the head gets damaged just buying a new cartridge will fix it.

That's one of the problems with inkjet refilling, your print head is likely clogged by the time you refill it, from debris or sitting dry too long. So you refill it and end up with crap quality or no printing at all.

I'm using aftermarket ink (G&G) and the quality seems to be the same as the Canon OEM inks. However, the cartridges do sometimes leak, so you might want to use a reputable site which has at least a 1 year replacement guarantee.

John C. Dvorak is convinced Epson owns G&G :laugh:

http://twit.tv/show/...eek-in-tech/355 @ 48:22

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!