Is it worth buying official ink cartridges?


Recommended Posts

Hi,

We're looking to replace our print cartridges and came across this page: http://www.cartridgesave.co.uk/ink-cartridges/HP/Officejet-4500.html

The recycled inks not only work out much cheaper per page, I also like the idea of recycling cartridges for environmental reasons

My main concern though, is whether or not I will ruin my printer - does anyone have experience in using recycled cartridges? How did you find it?

Thanks

I doubt it will ruin your printer. The company I used to work for used recycled ink jet cartridges instead of official HP ones. They worked just fine with the exception of the occasional one that would leak ink every where when you pulled the protective cap/film off. But for the price (and we was always able to get the bad ones replaced for free) its worth it.

But we didn't have color printers, I'd imagine color quality will vary.

Depends on what you print, legal documents or documents where you need quality id say so for originals, for homework and bits and bobs id say refills.

Only thing is it WILL void any warranty you have left on the printer so if it's a semi old one you've got nothing to lose.

Sometimes its cheaper to go get your own cartridge refilled. Tons of places do it, including Costco (if you happen to live near one in the UK).

All you do is drop off your own ink cartridge and they'll fill it up within the hour. Cost over here in the US (might be slightly different in the UK) is like $9 for the color, $8 for the black.

The quality? Well I've been using the same cartridge for my HP photosmart for at least a year now (get it refilled at Costco) and honestly stuff I print still looks exactly like it should.

Never had much luck with DIY refill kits or third party carts, but maybe it's just my particular printer being finicky too.

There's cases where buying the same printer new is cheaper than a colour cartridge.

Heh yea, I've done that a couple of times for my daughter's printer.. it's literally cheaper to just buy a new one. That's just screwed up.

I haven't bought ink cartridges in several years. In fact I don't remember when the last time I bought new cartridges.

Locally, we have a Goodwill Computer recycle store. I can go there and find new cartridges in their original boxes for $1 each. This past week I bought 4 new cartridges for my HP printer for $3.00. She only charge me $3 for 4 cartridges. The cartridges I bought were # 56, 57, 58, 59 for HP printers. You might see if there is a Goodwill Computer recycle store in your area. I believe they get them corporations donating large quantities of computer equipment and supplies. Also they don't always have the ones in stock you may need so go by there whenever near their store.

My experience of cheapy refill cartridges:

* From brand new report themselves to be about half empty already

* Dry up VERY quickly

* Clogg up your print heads

* Nowhere near as vibrant

* Had a few that simply just wouldn't print

* Ink has an odd smell about it

Again, these are just my own experiences - but I would much rather pay for OEMs

  • Like 2

I've had problems with the refills like leaking, low quality ink or the printer simply refusing to accept refilled carts. The mess and hassle of filling them isn't really worth the trouble in my opinion. I'm done with inkjets myself though, for printing documents laser printers are much higher quality and more economical and for photos you get higher quality prints for less money by just using a kiosk or ordering prints online.

  • Like 2

The only way non oem ink can do any real damage to a printer is to clog the print head. on most HP printers the print head is part of the cartridge (363, 364, 10 and 80 are the exceptions if i remember correctly) so if the head gets damaged just buying a new cartridge will fix it.

You do have to get a good quality ink, so don't buy the cheapest and there is no such thing as a universal inkjet ink.

The only way non oem ink can do any real damage to a printer is to clog the print head. on most HP printers the print head is part of the cartridge (363, 364, 10 and 80 are the exceptions if i remember correctly) so if the head gets damaged just buying a new cartridge will fix it.

That's one of the problems with inkjet refilling, your print head is likely clogged by the time you refill it, from debris or sitting dry too long. So you refill it and end up with crap quality or no printing at all.

I'm using aftermarket ink (G&G) and the quality seems to be the same as the Canon OEM inks. However, the cartridges do sometimes leak, so you might want to use a reputable site which has at least a 1 year replacement guarantee.

John C. Dvorak is convinced Epson owns G&G :laugh:

http://twit.tv/show/...eek-in-tech/355 @ 48:22

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!