• 0

Webroot users (past and present)


Question

Please specify any details about webroot you can. Thank you very much for your assistance!

I have a client that will need this info and this is a great place for it. Again, thank you very much for your assistance!!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1134722-webroot-users-past-and-present/
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

As I've stated in a previous thread (the one that Webroot Will was involved in) my experience was not so great with Webroot.

I love where they're going with the cloud-based AV but it's detection rates are sub-par. I love to test AV's so I intentionally visit dodgy and otherwise non reputable sites in order to try to get infected. With Webroot I was infected within days of installing. The real-time protection wasn't protecting at all. When I brought this up in the other thread to the Webroot rep, he didn't reply.

It's worth mentioning that I have been using Eset for 5+ years and have never been infected, whether trying to get infected or not.

  • 0

I'm not sure exactly what kind of information you want about Webroot. I have seen Webroot Antivirus exclusively on computers sold by BestBuy, and Revo Uninstaller has always done a stellar job removing it. Like Marshall said, Webroot Antivirus has a well-deserved reputation for being sub-par. Their detection rates are consistently poor, and network performance is often affected (at least on the university network where I had most of my experiences with it). Fortunately, the last time I had to deal with anything made by Webroot was more than a year ago.

  • 0

Hello,

I am not overly familiar with their product line, but Webroot was started in Boulder, Colorado, which is a great college town to visit. Easily accessible from Denver, and all sorts of nice galleries and coffees hops all over the place. Plus UC Boulder, of course.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

  • 0

I'm still using Webroot Secure Anywhere only because I paid for the year for it, I'm also using Malwarebytes Anti-Malware, as I had a couple of Trojan viruses go undetected when I downloaded from bit torrent, lucky I never installed the programs. My Webroot subscription expires in less than 60 days and I will probably go back to Eset.

  • 0

I was a reseller for webroot back in 2005. It was the best at the time, in 2006-2007 their ability to detect and remove became among the worst out there (well maybe not the worst but not as good as other utilities out there like malwarebytes). Detection rate was horrible and it really couldn't detect much. Pctools was much better and went on to resell their product, after which symantec bought them and they started to not detect the latest infections out there. Now I am not into reselling as much as recommending, which on top are bitdefender, kaspersky, and eset as far as paid goes.

  • 0

We are currently finished our roleout of a new product to replace webroot. We were only using them for email filtering and for web content filtering and our major complaint with them at the moment is that their Desktop Web Proxy software is nearly impossibly to remove in an automated manor, when we contacted them for assistance with this they told us to just re image each machine rather than removing it to make sure their software was properly removed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!