Box Office: Skyfall Passes The Dark Knight Rises


Recommended Posts

iOb3lLb.jpg

Sam Mendes' Skyfall continues its monster box office run, as the 23rd James Bond has officially become Sony's biggest film at the worldwide box office,

No one saw this coming, that's for sure. According to the latest report, the Sam Mendes-directed 23rd James Bond film has passed The Dark Knight Rises.

I thought Skyfall was pretty good for a James Bond movie although the scene where he was chasing the bad guy through on the Circle line was a little too unrealistic. There's just no way you could move through carriages like that during the rush hour :D

Good to see James Bond hitting the 1billion mark. I was very shocked when they even hit the 500million mark.

Hopefully the next one does even better ;) also i'm going to say, it's all done by british director, some fine british actors too :)

I thought Skyfall was a weird one to be honest. I thought it was a good film, but the bad guy wasn't a bond villain IMO. It felt more like Batman meets Bourne to me.

The bad guy kinda reminded me more of the Joker from TDK, a sociopath basically intent on blowing lots of stuff up to rustle some jimmies because he's bat**** insane. No world domination or anything like that.

I'd have said it was better than Quantum of Solace, but still not as good as Casino Royale.

Skyfall was problably the worst Bond movie Ive seen. When you go to a Bond movie (after seeing and there being so much) you expect certain things to happen and/or appear. This movie had none of them. I honestly dont see why people think this Bond movie was so great.

I thought Skyfall was a weird one to be honest. I thought it was a good film, but the bad guy wasn't a bond villain IMO. It felt more like Batman meets Bourne to me.

The bad guy kinda reminded me more of the Joker from TDK, a sociopath basically intent on blowing lots of stuff up to rustle some jimmies because he's bat**** insane. No world domination or anything like that.

I'd have said it was better than Quantum of Solace, but still not as good as Casino Royale.

The bad guy isn't like that at all. He's nothing like the joker, he's not as crazy or random. Everything the bad guy does in skyfall was to tear down the establishment that used him and tossed him aside like nothing. It's more about revenge really.

Skyfall was problably the worst Bond movie Ive seen. When you go to a Bond movie (after seeing and there being so much) you expect certain things to happen and/or appear. This movie had none of them. I honestly dont see why people think this Bond movie was so great.

This one was more personal and character driven while the older, gadget crazy and shallow, bad guy x wants to take over the world so bond has to go in and trash everything in some outlandish ways ended when they made casino Royale in the first place. The things you "expect" from a Bond movie have long since changed after die another day.

The bad guy isn't like that at all. He's nothing like the joker, he's not as crazy or random. Everything the bad guy does in skyfall was to tear down the establishment that used him and tossed him aside like nothing. It's more about revenge really.

This one was more personal and character driven while the older, gadget crazy and shallow, bad guy x wants to take over the world so bond has to go in and trash everything in some outlandish ways ended when they made casino Royale in the first place. The things you "expect" from a Bond movie have long since changed after die another day.

That is exactly what I hate about it. I've seen 20 other Bond movies and I come into them expecting a certain thing. These past three "Bond" movies, although being good movies, should just change their name from Bond because it is hardly the recognizable character I grew up watching. 20 prior movies succeeded just fine on corny villains, and "trash" as you call it. We have enough Bourne imitators out there as it is; Bond is just another one now.

That is exactly what I hate about it. I've seen 20 other Bond movies and I come into them expecting a certain thing. These past three "Bond" movies, although being good movies, should just change their name from Bond because it is hardly the recognizable character I grew up watching. 20 prior movies succeeded just fine on corny villains, and "trash" as you call it. We have enough Bourne imitators out there as it is; Bond is just another one now.

Maybe I'm wrong but I do believe this new Bond type isn't new at all but closer to Flemings character in the novels. I think we'll get a bit more of the old again in the next one, we now have q back, so expect your gadget fix. Skyfall though was more about 007 and M and their relationship than anything else. This alone sets it apart because the older ones never bothered to touch on that topic or show it.

  • Like 1

The "new Bond" in my opinion, is a more true to life warts and all character who is less reliant on gadgets and more on guile to get him out of trouble.A true rough around the edges,multilingual, globe trotting trouble shooter in the true sense of the word.

Now if we had a few more like him at MI6 we would be in better shape.

Skyfall was problably the worst Bond movie Ive seen. When you go to a Bond movie (after seeing and there being so much) you expect certain things to happen and/or appear. This movie had none of them. I honestly dont see why people think this Bond movie was so great.

I liked it because it didn't include all the things that you expect to see in a Bond film. The format is tired, dated and predictable and it's nice to see a new take on Bond. I was hoping that we'd see more of this new direction after Casino Royale and was disappointed to see that the follow-up was more of a traditional Bond film. I was glad to see that Skyfall returned to the style of Casino Royale.

I have been a Bond fan all my life and grew up watching Connery and Moore, was even around to see Lazenby make a brief appearance.Admittedly the reboot lacks some of the smug charm of a traditional Bond but I think Craig plays a BAMF and brings a new perspective to the genre. Its not as over the top with ridiculous spy gadgets ( As a sarcastic Q pointed out lol)

The ending scene was very iconic IMO. Moneypenny , Mallory in the old school office with the black leather studded door , all that was missing was the famous hat toss onto the coat stand. I'm hoping the next instalments will be even more back to grass roots with Special Forces back up at the end battles.

Bond with out a doubt, has a bigger following than BatMan will ever have.The Dark knight films wasn't that bad, but to be honest as a movie super hero...., he's a bit of a tosser. How many reboots do you need ?

Sure Bond changes actors from time to time but the story is always the same (Could even be that James Bond is the agents code name and not the actual person).His character is cinema legend and will always do well at the box office.

I have been a Bond fan all my life and grew up watching Connery and Moore, was even around to see Lazenby make a brief appearance.Admittedly the reboot lacks some of the smug charm of a traditional Bond but I think Craig plays a BAMF and brings a new perspective to the genre. Its not as over the top with ridiculous spy gadgets ( As a sarcastic Q pointed out lol)

The ending scene was very iconic IMO. Moneypenny , Mallory in the old school office with the black leather studded door , all that was missing was the famous hat toss onto the coat stand. I'm hoping the next instalments will be even more back to grass roots with Special Forces back up at the end battles.

Bond with out a doubt, has a bigger following than BatMan will ever have.The Dark knight films wasn't that bad, but to be honest as a movie super hero...., he's a bit of a tosser. How many reboots do you need ?

Sure Bond changes actors from time to time but the story is always the same (Could even be that James Bond is the agents code name and not the actual person).His character is cinema legend and will always do well at the box office.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!