Antivirus companies that have made major mistakes....


Recommended Posts

Please list those as honest as you can. Please provide more then 5 reported news links per vendor to confirm. Please also indicate the problem in full.

Please make sure to also post your honest experience about the problem with the anti-virus software that you have if you have experienced this major problem..

Remember.... This must have been a widespread problem documented in the media.

I will be preparing this list for a client so keep it professional, no flaming, no wars in this thread please. Thank you and much appreciated.

Sorry, no list, just Zonealarm, in my case it was better on win 7 x64 than norton, (not REALLY a problem, more of a gripe---> )Action Center kept telling me norton's off, or it's antivirus isn't running, kept having to uninstall/reinstall for the year I had it (at least 6 times a week in my case, most frustrating thing I ever bought) sometimes I would have to reinstall when starting pc.

Zonealarm ISS, 2nd or 3rd year now, I don't remember, NEVER had any infections. One time I thought I had, and I think Rappy told me to get a rootkit remover (sorry to the mod who it was if it wasn't Rappy) and all those removers he recommended found nothing (plus for ZA seeing as I used to have it on XP back in the day)

Talk about lazy!

Do your own research, what kind of professional goes to an internet forum and ask it's members to provide input on a project/report for their client?

  • Like 1

Well they wanted it this way don't ask me. It's not my idea. Research purposes as well. I told you all to please not be rude or flame....

Talk about lazy!

Do your own research, what kind of professional goes to an internet forum and ask it's members to provide input on a project/report for their client?

me me me!

then I go to dumber people than me and they're like 'you're a god among men'

http://news.cnet.com..._3-5063226.html

MS Blaster worm. I had Norton installed at the time and it was useless. Is it really as simple as that to beat an antivirus: cause a computer to shut down before the antivirus can update its' definitions?

I didn't know back then what I know now, I had no idea how to stop a computer from shutting down using the command prompt, and I didn't have a smartphone or other computer back then, so I had to try and do as much research as I could (on 1MB broadband I think) in the 60 seconds I had before my PC shut down each time. Was a nightmare! Once I found the shutdown -a command it was easy to fix.

I don't know if other antiviruses were of any more assistance though... maybe not.

Strange.

This is not the first time You ask "help" from Neowin members without You actually doing any research yourself. :/

Second link in Google for me.

http://antivirus.about.com/od/whatisavirus/tp/antivirusmistakes.htm

Gee..not lazy at all. :huh:

  • Like 2

While I agree with the overall sentiments - it's one thing asking for some help with an issue and another asking for others to do the whole task for you - let's remember to keep it civil. If you don't have a response that will help the OP then don't bother posting.

I'll start with the first one:

http://www.neowin.ne...ix-now-in-place

O hey wait, it's on the front page news

EXACTLY what I was going to post. Bet that link brought this topic up. Should go back and see if this topic was created by that person who said they gave up all their Kaspersky licenses for AVG, but I'm to lazy!!

Remeber, it's not just AV companies that have done this either. Remember when Malwarebytes had the same major issue with an update?

Hello,

As someone who actually works for a company which makes anti-malware software (the term "anti-virus" is not really de rigueur these days) I will admit to some curiosity. Do you have any idea why your client wanted you to "crowdsource" this to a forum, and what they planning on doing with the data? Aside from creating a report about user awareness of such issues, I really cannot see what the value would be for a report that sourced information in this fashion.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

I wasn't given much details, sorry.

They just went:

Hi Liz K./RemixedCat,

I noticed you are active on several forums and I would like your assistance with locating a partner that can help us with our security needs.

We are aware that you are a partner with Sophos (due to your contact/forum posts), however we discovered that they had a huge issue last year and we would like to avoid doing business with companies that have compromised thier customers computers.

We also have observed that you have a relationship with webroot. Is this correct? If so please specify what that relationship is.

We would also like it if you can ask around on a few of your forums and we can quickly find a new partner that way, or you may ask your co-workers. Please note that we are currently using Symantec's products, however they are not currently meeting our needs.

We would be thrilled to find a new partner that would meet our long term needs. Please note that we are not an IT focused company so we need even more help than most.

Thank you very much,

[name/company withheld]

Thing is I don't have a 'relationship" with webroot, nor do I have anything of theirs installed on my system or ever have. So I have no clue how good they really are. :(

I told them that as well. They haven't responded yet and I sent the reply to this email last night.

There seems to be a still unfixed bug in Avast on Windows XP that seems to make memory and CPU usage skyrocket when accessing network shares, I've reported it and been ignored so far. Will try and snag some evidence next time I'm at an XP unit.

It's one thing to ask for personal assistance; it's another to ask people to do your work for you. You should just search on Google or a security forum like everybody else here would do anyway. It's not like people have random anti-virus security breaches bookmarked just in case someone asks about them.

So nobody is allowed to ask for tech help here?

Some people actually do keep track of this stuff.... you know.... the fanboys.... so they have ammo against thier rvials supporters.....

kinda like how apple fanboys have TONS of links at the ready to attack windows fanboys....

I figured people would have those here. and this would be a good place to ask.

...but you didn't ask. I clicked on this thread thinking it was going to be an article. After I read the OP, I thought I somehow wandered into the freelance/request-a-task forum by accident.

You have to realize that absolutely nothing about this makes sense, even moreso when you included that weird-ass letter.

  • Like 1

Well I just wanted to ask what anti-malware company hasn't screwed up something major like deleting system files or anything.... that's all I asked was a simple question.....

I think everyone's reading into this too deeply and overreacting.

and just about every major one has and I even tried to look for myself for 5 hours and I couldn't find a decent one that hasn't..... so this was my "second opinion" sort of place as well.

I can understand why someone would need to gather extra data for a project like this, having reports from people using different configurations provides extra evidence, and it's the kind of research that most people don't have the resources to do on their own. If you want to help him do, if you don't then do not but is there really any need to drag the thread off topic because you don't like the way the member is trying to collect his data? It's sad to see so many people with an aversion to helping others without personal gain.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!