Recommended Posts

I built a virtual rig going by the suggestions given in the last thread I made and this is it: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/C3we

CPU: Intel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor

CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 82.9 CFM Sleeve Bearing CPU Cooler

Motherboard: ASRock Z77 Extreme4 ATX LGA1155 Motherboard

Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1600 Memory

Storage: Seagate Barracuda 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive

Video Card: HIS Radeon HD 7850 2GB Video Card

Case: Corsair 400R ATX Mid Tower Case

Power Supply: SeaSonic 520W 80 PLUS Bronze Certified ATX12V / EPS12V Power Supply

Monitor: AOC E2243FWK 21.5" Monitor

Keyboard: Razer Arctosa Wired Standard Keyboard

Mouse: Steelseries Kinzu

It comes to around ~1,371 USD [prices are higher in India, I don't know why.]

Any suggestions on how I can make it even cheaper without harming the performance too much? I want the best ****ing performance-to-price ratio, haha.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1135312-rate-this-build-suggestions/
Share on other sites

If its for gaming i don't understand why you spend more on the cpu than gpu.

My rule of thumb is cpu price = 2/3 gpu price.

This is a rather expensive setup for what this gpu can do.

What CPU do you recommend?

EDIT: And, do you have a better GPU in mind? A better CPU-GPU combination?

Are you going to overclock? If not, you can skip the CPU cooler, knock the i5 down to a lower i5 (or i3) and go to a business class motherboard.

Will Overclocking make a big difference? I am not tech-illiterate and so if OCing is worth the trouble and extra buck, I might just do it.

Can you give me a specific model for an i3/i5?

I'd say that CPU is fine, but maybe you could look at a 7950? I don't know how much more that would be in India, but it would certainly provide a very large improvement.

I would but it would increase the price by a lot.

Will Overclocking make a big difference? I am not tech-illiterate and so if OCing is worth the trouble and extra buck, I might just do it.

Can you give me a specific model for an i3/i5?

People will have differing opinions about this, but if you've never done it in the past, I don't know that a $200+ i5 is the best place to start.

The i3-2125 is a good processor. Use the stock cooler (unless you find out you need a better one, but you probably won't), and look at the costs of H77 or B75 motherboards. They might not be worth the downgrade, but I don't know how the prices spread out in your market.

What CPU do you recommend?

EDIT: And, do you have a better GPU in mind? A better CPU-GPU combination?

Well i have not look at the market enough lately to make any definitive recommendation. My PC is 3 years old and i dont plan to upgrade for another year. Rocking an old overclocked i5 750 and its still more than enough.

The only thing i know is i never spend more on the cpu than gpu when it comes to a gaming system. I would downgrade to the less expensive core i5 specially if you plan to overclock one day (you can run it stock for a while until its not powerful enough). But i've not read reviews so it might not be a good idea. That PSU looks expensive to me. You could downgrade the case too. It's an awesome case but expensive. I dont know the price where you live though. You might want to skip SSD for now too if you are short on money and add one later. ssd are great but 60gb is hardly worth it imo. It will speed boot but you wont even be able to put anything but the os and some apps on it.

I would upgrade to at the very least a 7870 or a 660oc or something like that. Preferably even a 7950 or a 660ti if you can but it might be too expensive.

I would not downgrade the mother board too much. It's a vital part of the system and a good mb is the basis of a good system.

1: i5 is ideal, current games can run 4 threads at a time.

2: Uprate the GPU to a Nvidia 600 series at least take advantage of on-board Physix

3: Your mother board Extreme 4 is primarily taking advantage of the on-board video from the i5, which you are not using anyways - drop down to the Pro 3.

I would not downgrade the mother board too much. It's a vital part of the system and a good mb is the basis of a good system.

Unlike Ivy Bridge, most of the Sandy Bridge boards will work fine.

1: i5 is ideal, current games can run 4 threads at a time.

2: Uprate the GPU to a Nvidia 600 series at least take advantage of on-board Physix

3: Your mother board Extreme 4 is primarily taking advantage of the on-board video from the i5, which you are not using anyways - drop down to the Pro 3.

1) i5, sure, but it doesn't have to be the k series. Also the 2125 can do 4 threads. I've not seen any gaming comparisons between a low end i5 and a newer i3, but I suspect they'd only be a few fps apart.

2) The 660 is probably at the best price point for him now

I would suggest an AMD alternative with an FX-6300 and a ASRock 970 Pro3 board. At stock the FX might be slower in most games than the i3, but it's faster in almost everything else and you'll be able to overclock it to compensate (unlike the i3). On top of that, the cash difference can be put towards a better GPU, which makes a bigger difference when it comes to games. I don't know what the prices are in India but performance-wise it should be something like this 7850<660<=7870<660Ti<=7950.

Another thing I'm not sold on is the monitor. How much does this LG cost in India? I can't give you much advice here because I'm not up to scratch, but if you're going for 1080P go for 23".

Well i have not look at the market enough lately to make any definitive recommendation. My PC is 3 years old and i dont plan to upgrade for another year. Rocking an old overclocked i5 750 and its still more than enough.

The only thing i know is i never spend more on the cpu than gpu when it comes to a gaming system. I would downgrade to the less expensive core i5 specially if you plan to overclock one day (you can run it stock for a while until its not powerful enough). But i've not read reviews so it might not be a good idea. That PSU looks expensive to me. You could downgrade the case too. It's an awesome case but expensive. I dont know the price where you live though. You might want to skip SSD for now too if you are short on money and add one later. ssd are great but 60gb is hardly worth it imo. It will speed boot but you wont even be able to put anything but the os and some apps on it.

I would upgrade to at the very least a 7870 or a 660oc or something like that. Preferably even a 7950 or a 660ti if you can but it might be too expensive.

I would not downgrade the mother board too much. It's a vital part of the system and a good mb is the basis of a good system.

1: i5 is ideal, current games can run 4 threads at a time.

2: Uprate the GPU to a Nvidia 600 series at least take advantage of on-board Physix

3: Your mother board Extreme 4 is primarily taking advantage of the on-board video from the i5, which you are not using anyways - drop down to the Pro 3.

Unlike Ivy Bridge, most of the Sandy Bridge boards will work fine.

1) i5, sure, but it doesn't have to be the k series. Also the 2125 can do 4 threads. I've not seen any gaming comparisons between a low end i5 and a newer i3, but I suspect they'd only be a few fps apart.

2) The 660 is probably at the best price point for him now

I would suggest an AMD alternative with an FX-6300 and a ASRock 970 Pro3 board. At stock the FX might be slower in most games than the i3, but it's faster in almost everything else and you'll be able to overclock it to compensate (unlike the i3). On top of that, the cash difference can be put towards a better GPU, which makes a bigger difference when it comes to games. I don't know what the prices are in India but performance-wise it should be something like this 7850<660<=7870<660Ti<=7950.

Another thing I'm not sold on is the monitor. How much does this LG cost in India? I can't give you much advice here because I'm not up to scratch, but if you're going for 1080P go for 23".

Okay, these are the processors available to me: which one do you recommend?

bV8Shzg.png

Unlike Ivy Bridge, most of the Sandy Bridge boards will work fine.

1) i5, sure, but it doesn't have to be the k series. Also the 2125 can do 4 threads. I've not seen any gaming comparisons between a low end i5 and a newer i3, but I suspect they'd only be a few fps apart.

We are only talking the difference between physical cores and hyper-threading but yes my point is - as a decent simple to follow guide i5 will do the job but an i3 is a possibility.

2) The 660 is probably at the best price point for him now

Good range - ti edition would be fantastic.

[/size]

Okay, these are the processors available to me: which one do you recommend?

bV8Shzg.png

What OS are you looking to run?

I would go for the i5 personally but the wife has the Bull Dozer - with a decent GPU you will be fine either way.

What OS are you looking to run?

I would go for the i5 personally but the wife has the Bull Dozer - with a decent GPU you will be fine either way.

Aren't the i5's last generation though? I'll be running Windows 7/8 64-bit

Okay, so here is the nicest configuration I have managed to make so far: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/C5lh minus the CPU and MB.

I need someone to give me a good MB+CPU for that ^ so that the price stays low and I get the most out of my GPU.

I'd probably go with the FX 4100 for now and plan for an upgrade when the improved Piledriver hits some time this year, otherwise it's the FX 8120. The motherboard I've already suggested. Why only those CPUs?

You'll need a bigger PSU, at least a good 550W.

Like this?

http://pcpartpicker.com/p/C5Ha

Aren't the i5's last generation though? I'll be running Windows 7/8 64-bit

Well this is how I would break it down.

The CPU is not the major concern, it can be a problem if the performance is too low but you can get away with either the i5 or FX 8120. The i5 has less cache and the FX 8120 has more cores but also an older instruction set. The key reason for my choice would be the upgrade ability you have IF you use a socket combination that leaves you open to Intel vs AMD.

You might enjoy the 8-cores at a later stage but games are not using this many threads yet.

IF you do go for the FX 8120 than I would recommend Windows 8 as the operating system has better support for 8-cores.

You don't have anything else than Seasonic ? I don't know about where you live but here Seasonic are expensive borderline overpriced imo. They make good psu but when you need to spend 100$ for a 600W psu ...

There's other good less expensive brand around. My psu is by ocz. Bought it 4 years ago and working perfectly with an overcloked system. It was if i remember corectly 20$ or 30$ less expensive than equiv Seasonic.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!