Would A New Router Give Me "Better" WiFi?


Recommended Posts

I could be wrong on this, but as far as I know Optimum hasn't updated to IPv6.

Nope you are right. I did a bit more research after I posted and that is indeed the case. So not even an option.

So my new router arrived today, and simply put... It rocks. :punk:

Out the box, default settings, set up SSID with password, BOOM, defaults to the fastest speeds possible (450 Mbit/sec), 5 GHz signal, my signal strength is BY FAR the best it has ever been. Just everything is so nice.

Just some quick screens...

https://dl.dropbox.c...SUS_WiFi_01.jpg

https://dl.dropbox.c...SUS_WiFi_02.jpg

So, a couple of questions for those that have this router, just wondering about a few settings.

First off after thinking about it, I will be sticking to the default stock firmware for now (I did update it right away, so on the latest version, 3.0.0.4.270). I thought Anaron said it best, custom firmware is really for power users, and I am not that. I just want to set up a few settings, and let it work. Sure, I may not be getting everything out of the router I can, but for now (I may definitely revisit this in the near future), just want to leave things as simple as possible.)

  1. So first off, should I enable QoS? If so, what should I put for the Upload and Download Bandwidth if I do enable it? (I get 50 down and 8 up from my ISP if that even matters).
  2. I honestly am not familiar with what IPv6 is, but see it mentioned frequently. Should I enable it (can I even enable it?)? And if so, what is it exactly? :blush:
  3. Under Firewall settings, there is an option to "Enable DOS protection" that by default is off. Should I turn it on? (just kind of sounds like something that should maybe be on :laugh: )
  4. I used to forward ports for services like Live, PSN, Apple TV, and I have a txt document of all the ports I did forward for each service. I guess I should just try each service and take it from there instead of automatically forwarding the port for each one? (each device also has a static IP)

That is it for now, I really just set it up 10 minutes ago, as I said, already so much better so hoping it stays this way, just curious about the above.

TIA for anyone who can answer, and again, thanks to everyone for the help in getting this router. I am so far very, very pleased. (Y)

I knew you'd like it. ASUS did an amazing job with the RT-N66U wireless router. It's pricey but worth every penny.

As for your questions:

  1. No. In my house, there are as many as seven people using the Internet and I haven't had any speed issues yet. You should only enable QoS when you have issues during heavy load (e.g. a scenario where there are a lot of devices on your network). In my case, the router is working fine and I haven't even thought about enabling QoS yet. I imagine there are less than seven people in your house so you have absolutely no need for QoS.
  2. IPv6 was made to replace IPv4 (regular IP addresses like 192.168.1.1). A lot of places haven't run out of IPv4 addresses so you don't have to worry about it. If and when your ISP rolls out IPv6 addresses, your router will use it.
  3. I don't have that option enabled. It's unnecessary but basically what it does is protect your router from "denial-of-service" attacks. The chances that you and I will be targeted is extremely low so there's no point in enabling it. It'll just increase your router's workload for no real benefit.
  4. I used to do the same thing on my old D-Link gaming router and in hindsight, I think it was a huge waste of time. The only time you need to open ports is if you're hosting a server and you want others to be able to find that server. Fortunately, most newer games don't require you to open any ports. As you said, just try each one and see if you come across an issue. If so, then open the required port. If not, then just leave it alone. :laugh:

It's a solid router so I'm sure it's running just as good as it did day-1 now that you've had it for nearly a week.

I wouldn't say 3rd party firmware is for power users, I would say its for anyone that is not happy with the native. If there is something you want/need your router and native does not support it. Good chance 3rd party does.

If your router is giving your issues, locks up, have to reboot it to get internet working again, etc.. What would it hurt to try 3rd party, they have a much better support model and update schedule to iron out bugs. Most major routers don't update firmware to add features unless there is a public outcry for it, and rarely fix any sort of bugs again unless reported by a large portion of the user base. Once the device is like 6 months old, good luck seeing any updates - they normally move on to their new model number and just leave the old users hanging for issues.

Nothing saying you have to move to 3rd party day one -- but it is nice to have it there as an option!! I would never suggest anyone buy a router that does not have 3rd party support. You never know what your wanting to do with device 6 months from now that was not part of the native firmware and you thought you would never need to do, etc.

I wouldn't say 3rd party firmware is for power users, I would say its for anyone that is not happy with the native. If there is something you want/need your router and native does not support it. Good chance 3rd party does.

If your router is giving your issues, locks up, have to reboot it to get internet working again, etc.. What would it hurt to try 3rd party, they have a much better support model and update schedule to iron out bugs. Most major routers don't update firmware to add features unless there is a public outcry for it, and rarely fix any sort of bugs again unless reported by a large portion of the user base. Once the device is like 6 months old, good luck seeing any updates - they normally move on to their new model number and just leave the old users hanging for issues.

Nothing saying you have to move to 3rd party day one -- but it is nice to have it there as an option!! I would never suggest anyone buy a router that does not have 3rd party support. You never know what your wanting to do with device 6 months from now that was not part of the native firmware and you thought you would never need to do, etc.

True, but you'd have to be somewhat of a power user in order to flash your router's firmware. You have to find out if your router can even be flashed with 3rd-party firmware and with some models, you need to take extra steps to get it to work properly. Just imagine how much an average Joe would freak out if he bricked his router because he tried to flash it with the wrong firmware.

If you're tech savvy, then it isn't hard (assuming you do your homework). Most guides are thorough enough, from what I've seen. But if you skip one step or make an error, then chances you've just acquired a new paper weight. I plan on using 3rd-party firmware a year or two down the line. I still have my old D-Link router which works fine with one or two people on the network so it'll serve as a guinea pig.

I wouldn't say 3rd party firmware is for power users, I would say its for anyone that is not happy with the native. If there is something you want/need your router and native does not support it. Good chance 3rd party does.

If your router is giving your issues, locks up, have to reboot it to get internet working again, etc.. What would it hurt to try 3rd party, they have a much better support model and update schedule to iron out bugs. Most major routers don't update firmware to add features unless there is a public outcry for it, and rarely fix any sort of bugs again unless reported by a large portion of the user base. Once the device is like 6 months old, good luck seeing any updates - they normally move on to their new model number and just leave the old users hanging for issues.

Nothing saying you have to move to 3rd party day one -- but it is nice to have it there as an option!! I would never suggest anyone buy a router that does not have 3rd party support. You never know what your wanting to do with device 6 months from now that was not part of the native firmware and you thought you would never need to do, etc.

Fair enough points. So I at least got a router that provides the option!!

True, but you'd have to be somewhat of a power user in order to flash your router's firmware. You have to find out if your router can even be flashed with 3rd-party firmware and with some models, you need to take extra steps to get it to work properly. Just imagine how much an average Joe would freak out if he bricked his router because he tried to flash it with the wrong firmware.

If you're tech savvy, then it isn't hard (assuming you do your homework). Most guides are thorough enough, from what I've seen. But if you skip one step or make an error, then chances you've just acquired a new paper weight. I plan on using 3rd-party firmware a year or two down the line. I still have my old D-Link router which works fine with one or two people on the network so it'll serve as a guinea pig.

I have flashed my old Linksys router with Hyper DDRT or whatever it was called, modded a 360 which was a whole bunch of insane steps including hooking up some crazy component to my SATA port, a PSP, and a few other devices over the years. I am fine with the actual steps of changing firmware, so that is not an issue. But I find in my older age I have a lower tolerance for tinkering, and just prefer things work as they should by default if possible. I guess I am not as brave as I once was, and just have way less time then I once did as well.

With the above said, it looks like I am going to have to play with some of the settings regardless next week. I am actually switching back to Verizon FIOS, going to soon be a Quantum customer (75 down 35 up :punk: ), and it is my understanding you must use the router they supply to you in order to get every feature they offer, such as the guide, etc. So it sounds as if I will be setting this Asus router up as an Access Point and not my main router. Slightly bummed about this fact since I just purchased it, but I really did not anticipate that I would be going back to Verizon so soon (it was door to door salesmen that got me back with them, not kidding). Setting it up as an AP looks easy enough from the brief research I have quickly done, they even have a wizard to do it if needed, and the hit on overall performance should be negligible.

I have flashed my old Linksys router with Hyper DDRT or whatever it was called, modded a 360 which was a whole bunch of insane steps including hooking up some crazy component to my SATA port, a PSP, and a few other devices over the years. I am fine with the actual steps of changing firmware, so that is not an issue. But I find in my older age I have a lower tolerance for tinkering, and just prefer things work as they should by default if possible. I guess I am not as brave as I once was, and just have way less time then I once did as well.

With the above said, it looks like I am going to have to play with some of the settings regardless next week. I am actually switching back to Verizon FIOS, going to soon be a Quantum customer (75 down 35 up :punk: ), and it is my understanding you must use the router they supply to you in order to get every feature they offer, such as the guide, etc. So it sounds as if I will be setting this Asus router up as an Access Point and not my main router. Slightly bummed about this fact since I just purchased it, but I really did not anticipate that I would be going back to Verizon so soon (it was door to door salesmen that got me back with them, not kidding). Setting it up as an AP looks easy enough from the brief research I have quickly done, they even have a wizard to do it if needed, and the hit on overall performance should be negligible.

I hear you man. It's nice to be able to tweak your hardware to get the most out of it. But it's also nice to have something that just works great out of the box with as little tweaking as possible.

I saw your thread about switching back to Verizon earlier. I've heard of ISPs recommending that you use their router and they usually do that with a modem/router combo. That is, a modem that has a built-in wireless router. I doubt it would have a unique feature that makes your Internet work better or anything. I've read posts from people that said they disabled the built-in router to use a different, and often times better, wireless router.

Anyway, I took a look at the specs of the Verizon FiOS router and it doesn't look like it's better than your ASUS RT-N66U. Maybe you should try using that as your main router first and see how things work. It wouldn't hurt to try right?

I hear you man. It's nice to be able to tweak your hardware to get the most out of it. But it's also nice to have something that just works great out of the box with as little tweaking as possible.

I saw your thread about switching back to Verizon earlier. I've heard of ISPs recommending that you use their router and they usually do that with a modem/router combo. That is, a modem that has a built-in wireless router. I doubt it would have a unique feature that makes your Internet work better or anything. I've read posts from people that said they disabled the built-in router to use a different, and often times better, wireless router.

Anyway, I took a look at the specs of the Verizon FiOS router and it doesn't look like it's better than your ASUS RT-N66U. Maybe you should try using that as your main router first and see how things work. It wouldn't hurt to try right?

I worded things weird, I definitely plan on using my Asus as my main router, but have to have it act as an AP off of their router, that is what I meant. I just prefer I did not even have to use theirs at all, but it should not hurt anything as you said, just an extra piece of equipment that if I could get away with not using, I would, but sounds as if they have some proprietary firmware that aspects of their services just will not work without. I guess I will find out this upcoming Tuesday.

I actually took off from work to be home for the switch to FIOS, so I will have a whole day to play around with things until they are good to go. (Y)

I worded things weird, I definitely plan on using my Asus as my main router, but have to have it act as an AP off of their router, that is what I meant. I just prefer I did not even have to use theirs at all, but it should not hurt anything as you said, just an extra piece of equipment that if I could get away with not using, I would, but sounds as if they have some proprietary firmware that aspects of their services just will not work without. I guess I will find out this upcoming Tuesday.

I actually took off from work to be home for the switch to FIOS, so I will have a whole day to play around with things until they are good to go. (Y)

Do you not have the ability to put the modem/router combo provided by your ISP into bridge mode? This would force your modem to act as just a modem and disable the router junk from it, allowing you to use your router directly connected to your ISP. Effectively eliminating an extra layer that isn't necessary.

If you're not sure, do a quick search online for your modem model and you should be able to find a guide to do this, or Verizon will possibly do it for you as well.

Nice !

What speeds did you have before that .?

50/15, so a nice little bump.

So a question for the network gurus, I want to assign the Asus which is setup as an Access Point a Static IP so it does not change, I see how to do that, but I am wondering, do I need to enter anything for the DNS fields? It looks like by default it has nothing in them? Or do I enter the DNS Servers reported by my main router?

So right now the Asus as an Access Point is 192.168.1.11

This will always change, and Asus has a Device Discovery app for Windows that tells you what it changes to, but that is a pain in the ass.

So I want to change it to lets say 192.168.1.166

I just leave everything else like the Default Gateway and Subnet Mask alone correct? (meaning at 192.168.1.1 and 255.255.255.0 respectively)

Here is a screen...

AsusAccessPoint-SETTINGS.png

And once I get it setup as a static IP, should I go ahead and add it as the DMZ'd device on my main router?

DL - Just thought you should see this since you'd probably like it better :)

http://www.dslreports.com/faq/16077

Basically you can use your WAN port on the ONT to get Internet but set the Actiontec device as secondary to power your TVs over the "cable" line. That way your ASUS is the main router in the house and controls internet and directly talks to the ONT. You can turn off wireless on the Actiontec and just stick it in some corner (still connected for MoCA/COAX :p)

That or you can setup COAX and Ethernet at the sametime. The Coax goes to your STB/TVs while the Ethernet goes to your ASUS.

http://www.dslreports.com/faq/16622

FYI you suck for having options - I'd take me some of that sweet uploads (backing up 200GB server at work was a 6 day process!)

Thanks as always Shotta, but not sure how any of that would improve my situation based on what I am seeing right now??? My Wireless speeds are as fast as wired, I see all my devices as if they are on the same network. Apple TV with AirPlay works, I can stream from my PC to PS3, I can connect to my Windows Gaming PC from my Macbook as always, everything seems to be working exactly as it should with my current setup. So I am almost of the mindset to just leave well enough alone you know?

So can anyone answer if I need to put the DNS Name Servers or can I just leave them blank as show in the screenshot? Referring to this post here.

I plan on making the IP Static, something like 192.168.1.77,

Again, this is just so it is easy to access from a browser. But I am hesitant for whatever stupid reason to change it since everything is working perfectly right now. Asus has a Discovery Utility if I leave it to Automatic that will find what the assigned IP winds up being, but that is Windows only, and although I have a Windows machine, I am mainly on my mac, hence why I want to make it static.

Will leave Subnet Mask at 255.255.255.0

And Gateway will be the main router, so the normal 192.168.1.1

Just need to know if I need to enter anything for DNS Name Servers, or does the main router handle that which I am thinking it does?

If I do need to enter something, do I just enter the DNS Name Servers that are listed on my main router (have that page open now so know what they are).

If you only want your Asus to be a dumb connection then leave it as is and enjoy. Your devices will connect to it but all data will be past to the Actiontec for DHCP/DNS or routing so that will work just fine.

As for my other post, I posted it in the instance you didn't want to use Verizon's "crappy" router and use your new baby for the full management of the network. If the Verizon stuff works then no need to mess with it anymore.

If you only want your Asus to be a dumb connection then leave it as is and enjoy. Your devices will connect to it but all data will be past to the Actiontec for DHCP/DNS or routing so that will work just fine.

As for my other post, I posted it in the instance you didn't want to use Verizon's "crappy" router and use your new baby for the full management of the network. If the Verizon stuff works then no need to mess with it anymore.

Yeah it just seems like there is a lot of room for the Verizon hardware to not work as it should with the alternatives. I would LOVE to have my Dark Knight (that is the actual name LOL) control everything, but I also do have a multi room DVR etc. that I want to work hassle free. Honestly even with the DK playing second fiddle, everything seems to be working pretty damn good. I disabled the Verizon's router Wireless, it was crap no doubt. Thanks again for all the help, no doubt appreciated. (Y)

Finally assigned the Static IP to my Asus acting as an Access Point. I waited until the weekend just in case for whatever reason something went wrong and I needed to troubleshoot, was no need as it took about 1 minute total.

So interesting observation I had, I originally did not assign the DNS servers, and my Wireless was overall about 10-15 Mb slower. As soon as I assigned the DNS Name Servers, I went back to the normal speeds...

2546167604.png

So why is that out of curiosity? I would think it was getting the DNS from the Verizon just the same as before when I had it set to Auto, so was it not? Or was it something else entirely?

Also speaking of the DNS servers, what are peoples thoughts on Open DNS? The way to go? When I assigned them, I put an Open DNS server as Name Server 1, and I matched the same DNS Server in spot #2 from my Verizon router? Should I not do this, and do either one or the other?

Finally assigned the Static IP to my Asus acting as an Access Point. I waited until the weekend just in case for whatever reason something went wrong and I needed to troubleshoot, was no need as it took about 1 minute total.

So interesting observation I had, I originally did not assign the DNS servers, and my Wireless was overall about 10-15 Mb slower. As soon as I assigned the DNS Name Servers, I went back to the normal speeds...

2546167604.png

So why is that out of curiosity? I would think it was getting the DNS from the Verizon just the same as before when I had it set to Auto, so was it not? Or was it something else entirely?

Also speaking of the DNS servers, what are peoples thoughts on Open DNS? The way to go? When I assigned them, I put an Open DNS server as Name Server 1, and I matched the same DNS Server in spot #2 from my Verizon router? Should I not do this, and do either one or the other?

The ASUS RT-N66U uses its own DNS servers by default so that's why you had slower speeds. If you want to use your ISP's DNS server, you'll have to set them on your Verizon router as well as your ASUS router. If you only do it on your Verizon router, then I think any device connecting to the ASUS router will use the ASUS DNS servers. You'll want to use your ISP's DNS servers because generally, they're the fastest. OpenDNS is great but you should only use it for its features.

You do understand the what dns serves you point to have NOTHING to do with the latency or bandwidth between you and some server you moving data between.

Could dns effect your browsing speed in the sense that it takes longer to resolve something - sure! Once that something is resolved DNS is no longer in the picture and how fast you download or upload between that server and you has again nothing to do with dns.

Thinking the dns server you used to resolve speedtest.net has something to do with how fast your test was is pure and utter nonsense.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!