Do you want the start menu in Windows 8?


Do you want the start menu in Windows 8  

631 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want the start menu in Windows 8?

    • Yes
      351
    • No
      280


Recommended Posts

What is your excuse about the All Apps section? I have seen readme's shortcuts to websites, and other things in there. With Windows 7, they were all neatly tucked away in folders. Some programs put it in a sub-folder labeled Additional Resources. But.....now they are always visible when I go to All Apps.

Exactly

visug.jpg

  • Like 4

They also don't look like Windows Modern Tiles, so while it's only "Exe Shortcuts" it looks like crap!

And? x86 apps can't and most likely never will have a proper Metro tile.

What is your excuse about the All Apps section? I have seen readme's shortcuts to websites, and other things in there. With Windows 7, they were all neatly tucked away in folders. Some programs put it in a sub-folder labeled Additional Resources. But.....now they are always visible when I go to All Apps.

Yes... But if you're up to date on your "power user" techniques, you'd never have to venture into All Apps to begin with. Also, not all programs have their own folders. There are many that just sit out, flapping in the wind. You could argue with that, that the All Programs Menu is less organized than All Apps in Windows 8.

And? x86 apps can't and most likely never will have a proper Metro tile.

Yes... But if you're up to date on your "power user" techniques, you'd never have to venture into All Apps to begin with.

So....Microsoft gets a free pass then? Why even offer an All Apps section if you should never have to go there?

And? x86 apps can't and most likely never will have a proper Metro tile.

Yes... But if you're up to date on your "power user" techniques, you'd never have to venture into All Apps to begin with. Also, not all programs have their own folders. There are many that just sit out, flapping in the wind. You could argue with that, that the All Programs Menu is less organized than All Apps in Windows 8.

yes, but the ones flapping in the wind are only single shortcuts 1 per application and they are all in a straight vertical alphabetical list. Your answer just yelled "I know windows 8 might not be great in that area, but I just can't admit it., so how can I spin this to make Windows 8 sound awesome!"

  • Like 2

So....Microsoft gets a free pass then? Why even offer an All Apps section if you should never have to go there?

Again, how and why is Microsoft responsible for apps that want to barf up garbage all over the OS? I fail to see how they are at fault.

Again, how and why is Microsoft responsible for apps that want to barf up garbage all over the OS? I fail to see how they are at fault.

Hmmm....let's see here....Start Menu: Not a mess of barf'ed up garbage. Start Screen: A complete mess of barf'ed up garbage. What has changed? The developers did not suddenly become crappy as soon as Windows 8 came out. The only thing that changed was....Windows!!!

So Yes, Microsoft should have changed the way the All Apps portion worked in the Start Screen. Providing collapsable and expandable folder-like items. I would not be hard to do since the installer has been coded to build those sub folders. Microsoft is at fault for not interpreting it properly.....

Hmmm....let's see here....Start Menu: Not a mess of barf'ed up garbage. Start Screen: A complete mess of barf'ed up garbage.

HAHAHAHHA!!! OMG ...I actually laughed out loud and clapped all at the same time! Good Job!

Hmmm....let's see here....Start Menu: Not a mess of barf'ed up garbage. Start Screen: A complete mess of barf'ed up garbage. What has changed? The developers did not suddenly become crappy as soon as Windows 8 came out. The only thing that changed was....Windows!!!

So Yes, Microsoft should have changed the way the All Apps portion worked in the Start Screen. Providing collapsable and expandable folder-like items. I would not be hard to do since the installer has been coded to build those sub folders. Microsoft is at fault for not interpreting it properly.....

So, you say you don't have the time for a folderless Start Screen, but have all the time in the world to dig through endless folders and subfolders buried in an area 1/10th the size of your screen?

So, you say you don't have the time for a folderless Start Screen, but have all the time in the world to dig through endless folders and subfolders buried in an area 1/10th the size of your screen?

You basically just proved our point for us. Good Job! (Y) yes the start menu is easier to dig through because it's a vertical alphabetical list taking up ONLY 1/10th the screen! As opposed to the barfed up garbage taking up our ENTIRE screen!

Again, how and why is Microsoft responsible for apps that want to barf up garbage all over the OS? I fail to see how they are at fault.

Good God.

I'm outta here.......reaction.jpg

  • Like 2

So, you say you don't have the time for a folderless Start Screen, but have all the time in the world to dig through endless folders and subfolders buried in an area 1/10th the size of your screen?

Yes, because I am not presented with a list of thousands of icons, and hard to read titles (when you have dozens and dozens of icons, it is sometimes hard to see the title of the section).

Despite what you might think, folders are more organized. Why do you think I have my health (and other) insurance in folders? I do not need to look for it, I find the label, and go from there.

Yes, because I am not presented with a list of thousands of icons, and hard to read titles (when you have dozens and dozens of icons, it is sometimes hard to see the title of the section).

Despite what you might think, folders are more organized. Why do you think I have my health (and other) insurance in folders? I do not need to look for it, I find the label, and go from there.

OMG, I have a great idea. Someone should take a picture of their filing cabnlet before, and then take every piece of paper out of every folder and stick it on the wall and take another picture LOL.

  • Like 3
Despite what you might think, folders are more organized.

Microsoft, or more specifically

our experience with folders broadly and in the Start menu tells us that folders are a way of burying things, not organizing them.

Sinfosky's also explicitly advertised this as a differentiating feature from iOS in one of their keynotes. Somehow I don't see them changing their opinion on this.

Folders are great for organizing files. Not so much for an app launcher. You want to enable the user to find their new app, not have them dig forever for it.

And yes, before you take whatever digs you want to next, I have spent countless times helping people find what they were looking for, because it was buried. That's not something you want.

The Start Screen is designed to only display the EXE files for an app, Help files and other junk will remain in the All Apps menu. If you have an app developed with poor coding practices, then yes, you may have one or two extra tiles, that take all but a few seconds to remove.

If you have an app developed with poor coding practices, then yes,you may have one or two extra tiles, that take all but a few seconds to remove.

Pray tell how that is accomplished from within the new All Apps menu...

Let me also understand, any app that creates more than a single app link is using poor coding practices? If discoverability is key, why are new apps shuffled to the end of the Start Screen (where I've already had to help people 'find' it as well)?

Pray tell how that is accomplished from within the new All Apps menu...

Let me also understand, any app that creates more than a single app link is using poor coding practices? If discoverability is key, why are new apps shuffled to the end of the Start Screen (where I've already had to help people 'find' it as well)?

Why is everyone so overly concerned with the All Apps menu? For a menu that's not supposed to be largely seen often, people here are keen to pick it apart.

You act as if users just sit there and stare at their PC hoping it will do something for them. Let me tell you, my classmates at school don't do this. Maybe your generation has trouble, but mine does not. They can pick up a device and run with it in seconds. It didn't take long for friends to become familiar with Start, and if they can do it, anyone can.

But this "Woe is me, things have changed!" crap is getting old. It's been four months since release, if you're having THAT much difficulty, then perhaps computers are not for you.

But this "Woe is me, things have changed!" crap is getting old. It's been four months since release, if you're having THAT much difficulty, then perhaps computers are not for you.

Or perhaps not everyone likes the direction Windows 8 is taking, and should stick with 7.. like I do. Computers most definitely are for me, as I use them for a living.. but I am not willing nor wanting to get rid of the desktop as it is, and if forced to use 8 startisback would be the first thing I install.

  • Like 2

One more thing that bugs me about windows 8 and the fact that On the desktop side of things Microsoft has gone clueless when they remove the dedicated "Computer" button. On a desktop I consider "Computer" a key section of windows. Sure you can awkwardly click the new explorer button the bottom then click the very small "Computer" name on the left hand side.

It seems the only way pro windows 8 users can defend windows 8 is by saying "Use this hot key, use that hot key, just search for it, pin your stuff to your taskbar". The average user does not know about hot keys. Most average users don't even know that control + C Copies. Most never even knew their keyboard had a windows key, most probably still don't. When you open up the new start screen how does the user know they can just start typing to find something? Does Microsoft tell them? No. How about an actual search button, oh that's right, that's hidden. What about the "All programs list"? Oh that's right that's hidden too.

I'm not sure which brain cell damaged sasquatch though it was a good idea to hide all the menu's from the user on the desktop. It's something you have heard and will hear me say. It makes absolutely no sense. It's such a bad UI choice for the desktop it makes you think Microsoft did Zero user testing.

Why are we activating hidden menu's for everything on the desktop? Clearly they knew they were loosing out on the tablet market and wanted to get there as soon as possible. So instead of giving the desktop a decent user experience they hurried up finished windows 8 covered in touch and said good enough, we don't have time to refine it on the desktop we have to get it out, ship it!

Then there is the fact that during the setup Microsoft removed the option to set which timezone you are in... WTF!!. Like I said in a previous thread, I connected remotely to a woman who has had her windows 8 machine for a month and her clock was still set on Pacific standard time. Although this does fit with Windows 8 mission statement "More clicks". Instead of having a simple drop down menu during the initial setup, we have have to change it by going into the clock options.

this "Woe is me, things have changed!" crap is getting old. It's been four months since release, if you're having THAT much difficulty, then perhaps computers are not for you.

What do you care how people like their computers? Personally, I think the Twike is kind of an awesome car.

But I wouldn't want to force it on you...

post-5569-0-03592000-1361980300.png

Why is everyone so overly concerned with the All Apps menu? For a menu that's not supposed to be largely seen often, people here are keen to pick it apart.

You act as if users just sit there and stare at their PC hoping it will do something for them. Let me tell you, my classmates at school don't do this. Maybe your generation has trouble, but mine does not. They can pick up a device and run with it in seconds. It didn't take long for friends to become familiar with Start, and if they can do it, anyone can.

But this "Woe is me, things have changed!" crap is getting old. It's been four months since release, if you're having THAT much difficulty, then perhaps computers are not for you.

Nice dodge, again, just admit you're wrong once in awhile, it would do wonders to the temperment of the discussion. Please, tell me about those few clicks though...

So because your generation is so stupid that you can only use devices you can learn 'in a few seconds' you are going to berate others with the same you can't handle change cop out? We aren't having difficulty, we simply don't prefer it because complexity doesn't make us piddle like a scared dog.

Your thread on the Start menu is laughable simply because you have a warped, n00bish view of the use of All Programs (since as you admit, you never used it), where many actually like the utility of browsing for organized things. So please, adjust your 'tude, dude. That broken record has been skipping for much longer than four months.

Nice dodge, again, just admit you're wrong once in awhile, it would do wonders to the temperment of the discussion. Please, tell me about those few clicks though...

So because your generation is so stupid that you can only use devices you can learn 'in a few seconds' you are going to berate others with the same you can't handle change cop out? We aren't having difficulty, we simply don't prefer it because complexity doesn't make us piddle like a scared dog.

Your thread on the Start menu is laughable simply because you have a warped, n00bish view of the use of All Programs (since as you admit, you never used it), where many actually like the utility of browsing for organized things. So please, adjust your 'tude, dude. That broken record has been skipping for much longer than four months.

Exactly, It's not that we can't use the Start Screen, we just don't want to be dumbed down

The photo on the bottom was taken from the movie "Idiocracy".

9031.jpg

One more thing that bugs me about windows 8 and the fact that On the desktop side of things Microsoft has gone clueless when they remove the dedicated "Computer" button. On a desktop I consider "Computer" a key section of windows. Sure you can awkwardly click the new explorer button the bottom then click the very small "Computer" name on the left hand side.

It seems the only way pro windows 8 users can defend windows 8 is by saying "Use this hot key, use that hot key, just search for it, pin your stuff to your taskbar". The average user does not know about hot keys. Most average users don't even know that control + C Copies. Most never even knew their keyboard had a windows key, most probably still don't. When you open up the new start screen how does the user know they can just start typing to find something? Does Microsoft tell them? No. How about an actual search button, oh that's right, that's hidden. What about the "All programs list"? Oh that's right that's hidden too.

I'm not sure which brain cell damaged sasquatch though it was a good idea to hide all the menu's from the user on the desktop. It's something you have heard and will hear me say. It makes absolutely no sense. It's such a bad UI choice for the desktop it makes you think Microsoft did Zero user testing.

Why are we activating hidden menu's for everything on the desktop? Clearly they knew they were loosing out on the tablet market and wanted to get there as soon as possible. So instead of giving the desktop a decent user experience they hurried up finished windows 8 covered in touch and said good enough, we don't have time to refine it on the desktop we have to get it out, ship it!

Then there is the fact that during the setup Microsoft removed the option to set which timezone you are in... WTF!!. Like I said in a previous thread, I connected remotely to a woman who has had her windows 8 machine for a month and her clock was still set on Pacific standard time. Although this does fit with Windows 8 mission statement "More clicks". Instead of having a simple drop down menu during the initial setup, we have have to change it by going into the clock options.

Refine what on the desktop? The desktop is a subset of the Metro UI now, it was intended and purposefully designed that way from the start. And there is nothing wrong with hidden menus? Why does my screen need to be cluttered with menus? It makes no logical sense to overwhelm the user. I want my content to be the focus, not eleventy billion options cluttering my screen. And, if you wanna make the argument, you have hidden menus on ANY OS. Mac, Linux, and even Windows 7. What Windows 8 does is no different. The only thing is that I can now activate them with a swipe of the mouse or a swipe of my finger.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Indeed - drives me mad - usually because Refresh is hidden in the full menu.
    • Firefox has had rounded corners for many years. I take it you're not a fan of modern browsers?
    • The problem is in the fundamentals of how businesses are allowed to operate and the change should happen in the basics and certain consumer friendly and moral practices should be enforced by law. This would fix so many things, not just this ages old default browser issue which is a tiny drop in the backut that includes a flood of privacy and other issues.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!