Do you want the start menu in Windows 8?


Do you want the start menu in Windows 8  

631 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want the start menu in Windows 8?

    • Yes
      351
    • No
      280


Recommended Posts

For me, its much less about wanting the classic Start Menu but wanting either better integration or better separation between Metro and the Desktop. Most arguments about the menu really boil down to that. At the most basic, add a visible icon since there is zero benefit to hiding it. That way it also orients with the taskbar instead of being a different entity.

No, I'd rather get some information at a glance from the start screen than have a small menu that really doesn't show me that much.

Really, I launch most of my applications by typing in the first few letters and pressing Enter. Windows 8 supports that, so for me it's no big deal. Just pin your frequently used apps to the start screen and access the others when needed via search.

This topic has been clubbed to death like a baby seal, but I don't think there has ever been a simple yes or no poll. I tried searching for one but didn't find anything.

The reason for this poll, is because of the Editorial on the front page

Windows 8 users still want a Start menu and a Facebook app

http://www.neowin.ne...-a-facebook-app

While this isn't the entire Windows 8 user base it is part of the Neowin user base.

Sadly the start menu is most likely never returning to Windows.

The Start menu has returned, and it's name is 'Start8' (tried them all, and this is by far the best). Sometimes Microsoft doesn't furnish a particular application, or just a very basic application. Reaching out to a third party application supplier is always a great choice.

So basically if you need a Start Menu go out and add it on. Jeez, does Microsoft always have to be the only solution to a non-existent problem!

  • Like 1

Nope. I like the start screen much more than the start menu. I am happy the start menu is gone. Embrace the future!! :D

Future? Touch? I rather see this as an stagnation of technology... because we haven't been able to read the minds yet and also because of the inefficiency vs a mouse.

No its better than the start menu ever was, No more moving shortcuts around and deleting web,readme and uninstall shortcuts it just shows my programs.

On most of my programs, those still show up in the Start Screen, except now they are in your face every time you go to All Apps. Yeah having folder structure is SOOOOOOO horrible, but I do not mind seeing these readmes and other random files every time I go to All Apps!

SK[' timestamp=1360342690' post='595510154]

Because it's not native.

The Start Menu is dead and never to return, get over it people.

Try using Hyper-V, VMWare, a Mac with Bootcamp, or a touchscreen point of sale machine with no keyboard on Windows 8, then get over it yourself.

Try using Hyper-V, VMWare, a Mac with Bootcamp, or a touchscreen point of sale machine with no keyboard on Windows 8, then get over it yourself.

Considering you should be more than able to use keyboard shortcuts with most of these, there is no problem here.

On a touchscreen, Start can be accessed by the Charms Bar, so again, no issues.

On most of my programs, those still show up in the Start Screen, except now they are in your face every time you go to All Apps. Yeah having folder structure is SOOOOOOO horrible, but I do not mind seeing these readmes and other random files every time I go to All Apps!

May I ask why you are constantly in that menu that it causes you so much pain? Between app pinning and Search, there are easier ways of getting around to the things you need to find.

May I ask why you are constantly in that menu that it causes you so much pain? Between app pinning and Search, there are easier ways of getting around to the things you need to find.

Um maybe because I have so many programs, and when I am paid to do work I do work. I do not have hours to spend pinning everything and then I will have to horizontally scroll through all the shortcuts on the start screen.

For example: I do not need to pin "Visual Studio Command Prompt", yet I still do use it every once and a while. I do not have to scroll through hundreds of boxes to find it. With the Start Menu, it is MUCH MUCH more organized: Start - Visual Studio 2010 - Visual Studio Tools - Visual Studio Command Prompt.

Nice....Clean....Organized....not in my face every time.

Um maybe because I have so many programs, and when I am paid to do work I do work. I do not have hours to spend pinning everything and then I will have to horizontally scroll through all the shortcuts on the start screen.

For example: I do not need to pin "Visual Studio Command Prompt", yet I still do use it every once and a while. I do not have to scroll through hundreds of boxes to find it. With the Start Menu, it is MUCH MUCH more organized: Start - Visual Studio 2010 - Visual Studio Tools - Visual Studio Command Prompt.

Nice....Clean....Organized....not in my face every time.

Start - (typing "comand") c - o - m (already listed at "c") - Visual Studio Command Prompt

  • Like 2

Um maybe because I have so many programs, and when I am paid to do work I do work. I do not have hours to spend pinning everything and then I will have to horizontally scroll through all the shortcuts on the start screen.

For example: I do not need to pin "Visual Studio Command Prompt", yet I still do use it every once and a while. I do not have to scroll through hundreds of boxes to find it. With the Start Menu, it is MUCH MUCH more organized: Start - Visual Studio 2010 - Visual Studio Tools - Visual Studio Command Prompt.

Nice....Clean....Organized....not in my face every time.

^ the start screen does this automaticly and filters out the crap without having to send them to the recycle bin. Best of both worlds

But your right there is a lot of scrolling in the start screen better to have a tiny all programs menu no scrolling there /s

Hell yes. For people without touchscreen monitors (which is the majority of monitors), you need the damn start button in Windows. Hell, I still would want the start button on a monitor without a touchscreen. I can't tolerate Windows 8 without a start button.

  • Like 2

Just pin your frequently used apps to the start screen and access the others when needed via search.

I disagree when you are talking about primary Desktop users. The Start Screen is clearly NOT for Frequent Desktop apps. The cleanest flow is that all of your commons (even the dynamic ones of the classic menu) are pinned to the taskbar. Uncommon ones pin to StartScreen and infrequent ones are searched or worse, browsed for.

But your right there is a lot of scrolling in the start screen better to have a tiny all programs menu no scrolling there /s

Our biology prefers thinner columns so the smaller space of the classic menu is by no means a detriment some pretend it to be since we can only scan one at a time. The issue isn't scrolling, its finding what you want in multiple columns vs a nested single column. (It 'breaks' organization since it boils up subfolders to the main level in an effort to be friendlier to people that don't understand the organization. In practice, those people never used it that way anyway and it just frustrates those that have.)

I don't need it (and I am a "command line guy", I spend most of my time using command line/power shell), but the good solution would be that the user can enable it or disable it (the start menu and the start screen as well). That way, everyone would be happy, and that's the point of it anyway...

I don't miss the it and got used to the new Start Screen just like I was mad during the transition from toolbars to ribbon in Office. I got used to the ribbon.

Hey how about a bring the Start button but it brings you to the start screen for people who like buttons instead of hot corners. I really don't care much about the Old start button.

Yes, I do.

I won't bother with my reasons since

A) They have been explained many times before

B) Someone will choose to tell me how I can achieve the same results in Windows 8 without a Start Menu, despite the fact that:

C) It is a personal preference.

Very well said, friend! Couldn't have said it better myself. :)

I don't personally. I'm quite happy using one of the alternatives (like Start8).

What I want is for the Start Screen to be better, both functionality wise and with how it works with the desktop?

It's speaks volumes about windows 8 and metro when over 40% of posters at a predominately windows site (aka neoWIN) want the start menu back.

Your point is valid but I think it's important to distinguish the posters here as experienced Desktop users. Consumers who may buy an AIO touchscreen or a tablet (not too many consumers at this point), they won't care much about the Start Menu.

I find it far more efficient and capable but not many soccer moms are going to search enough to care about how clumsy Modern UI search is, or want to quickly browse their computer from the Start Menu, or Recorded TV, or Favorites, or their Personal Folder, or the Network.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Less disk space means less bandwidth demands which means lower operating costs for service providers... that's where money talks. ... cuz it's not about improving video quality!... that's just marketing spin.
    • And thereby lies the rub. AV1 support is not as wide as paid analysts would have the industry believe. With AV2 around the corner, it's going cause more time backlog in adoption (how many recent purchasers will upgrade yet-again within the next 6-12 months? most would rather stay pat for another 1+ years before even thinking about upgrading their setups).
    • Microsoft OneDrive is getting a simple yet much needed feature by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily expanding OneDrive’s file management capabilities over the years, including for shared content and shortcuts, although it has had its flaws, too. The cloud storage platform introduced support for folder shortcuts several years ago, allowing users to pin frequently accessed shared folders from OneDrive, SharePoint, and Teams. Now, Microsoft is refining that experience further with a new way to organize those shortcuts as revealed in a recent Microsoft 365 roadmap addition. Previously, shortcuts added through the “Add shortcut to My files” option would appear alongside all other files and folders in the root of a user's OneDrive. And although it's meant to be useful, this approach could also create clutter along the way, especially for heavy users who may have to work with large numbers of shared folders across multiple projects and teams on their systems. This is where Microsoft’s latest feature comes in, as it is looking to address this inconvenience by giving users the option to place new shortcuts inside a dedicated “Shortcuts” folder instead. The feature is designed to keep shortcut links organized into a single location instead of scattering throughout the main OneDrive directory. Hence, the idea is to make navigation and usability easier and simpler. The first time a user chooses this option, OneDrive will automatically create the folder, and to help make it stand out from the other folders, the Shortcuts folder will have a distinct visual identity featuring a unique color and a building-style icon. That being said, the new Shortcuts will behave just like any other folder in OneDrive, and as such, users will be able to move it to a different location, rename it, share it with others, or remove it entirely if they prefer a different structure. You can view the entry on the Microsoft 365 roadmap website here. Currently, the feature is in the "in development" phase, but the tech giant expects the rollout to start next month (July 2026). Do keep in mind, though, that new feature rollouts often get delayed.
    • VS Code 1.123 introduces massive upgrades for persistent AI developer workflows by Paul Hill Microsoft has just released Visual Studio Code 1.123 alongside its annual developer conference, Build 2026. This release, as always, has a heavy focus on advanced AI agent integration and making the built-in browser more robust. Notably, this update brings big sync changes that keep your AI agents persistent across sessions. With this update, VS Code now supports cross-machine syncing for chat histories, touched files, repository contexts, and related PRs via GitHub accounts, tying users even more into Microsoft’s developer ecosystem. This update also introduces the new /chronicle command that allows you to query past sessions using natural language, generate instant standup reports, and get personal productivity insights. Microsoft has also made some improvements to network-dependent operations, it explains: “When a terminal command that is run by a local agent requires access to domains that are not configured as allowed domains, the command is automatically retried inside the sandbox with unrestricted network access. After that, if it still fails, it falls back to unsandboxed execution. This allows network-dependent operations such as git fetch to finish, while keeping filesystem protections in place.” Microsoft has not stopped there; in this update, it also allows developers to drag, drop, and pin multiple agent sessions side-by-side for easy code comparisons in real-time. It also introduces the Research Agent, accessible via /research. This is a read-only, depth-optimized tool that gets data from the web, local codebase, and GitHub to give you a Markdown report on complex APIs or unfamiliar code. Now, let’s talk about the integrated browser and some security enhancements. VS Code 1.123 features enhanced screenshot capture tools that allow for targeted Area Screenshots and Full Page Screenshots to send layout context instantly to AI chat. The address bar has also been revamped, supporting favorite pages and tab management. Finally, on the security front, this update introduces a safety-first two-hour delay on third-party extension auto-updates to safeguard against compromised or buggy releases. This release is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux. If you have VS Code, keep an eye out for the update availability notification. If you still don’t have VS Code, you can get it here.
    • I'm hoping with the Surface Pro 12, I can use either USB-C for my Xreal One Pro glasses. With my Surface Pro 11 OLED X Elite, I have to plug them into the top port. The bottom port will power it, but nothing shows on the screen. Maybe it's my setting. When I plug in the glasses, I have it output only to the glasses. So maybe I need to turn on both displays with it in the top port, then switch the glasses to the bottom port and set it to output only to the glasses. And then hopefully Windows remembers the settings for either the top port and bottom port (one of the awesome features of Windows where it remembers the exact configuration when plugging in external monitors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      227
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      71
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      60
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!