Recommended Posts

minimum wage jobs were never meant to be careers, that fallacy has been force fed to us for awhile. anyone without the ambition, who's willing to settle into an entry level job without seeking to improve their circumstance, doesn't deserve more money.

^ Not everyone has the intelligence and abilities (or money to train) to get much better jobs.

And there are not enough 'better' jobs out there for all who want one. ;)

^ Not everyone has the intelligence and abilities (or money to train) to get much better jobs.

And there are not enough 'better' jobs out there for all who want one. ;)

Most who have really done well for themselves didn't have it handed to them. Neither Gates or Zuckerberg finished college. It doesn't take a genius, just a little bit of drive.

^ Not everyone has the intelligence and abilities (or money to train) to get much better jobs.

And there are not enough 'better' jobs out there for all who want one. ;)

There is Financial aide available to those that cannot afford it. In some states if you are a resident, the tuition to a state school is free.

Why the United States only? Anyway, these online petitions are nothing more than feel-good measures. They have very little practical value.

As I'm sure you know, racism has been around since biblical times. Sadly, it's part of human nature.

I don't agree it is part of human nature.

I always thought racism is illegal throughout the world.

It bores me that we have people called white (Caucasian) that do not like people that are called black (even though they're skin colour is brown) and vice versa.

We had two world wars to which people of all colours joined up to defeat Nazi's, you know those that wanted a white. blonde haired, blue eyed only super race.

68 years since the end of the last huge war, WWII, this crap still happens.

How sad.

Why not get thicker skin and stop trying to convince our representatives to pass laws to control social interactions? I'm not racist in any way, but we don't need any laws controlling whether or not a person is allowed to be racist. Some people are, and some people aren't, that's just the way things are, and the way things have been since the dawn of man. If you don't like a person's viewpoints, don't interact with them, there's no need to start trying to throw people in jail because you disagree with them.

I'm all for trying to make the world a better, nicer place. But who is gonna be the ones who decide what is racist or not?

If I say I think Asian women are sexy, do I go to jail, or get a fine? Racism works both ways, not many people get made when it is used in positive ways.

yes. I knew that USA always racist against deaf people who are having hard time to find a real job for many years. Deaf american people sell ABC card to many hearing people accross the USA.

I'm all for trying to make the world a better, nicer place. But who is gonna be the ones who decide what is racist or not?

If I say I think Asian women are sexy, do I go to jail, or get a fine? Racism works both ways, not many people get made when it is used in positive ways.

No you won't go to Jail.

Racism is defined as: The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

If you fancy a bit of Asian snatch then good for you as I personally think, that Bengali, Pakistani, Indian and Sri Lank-an are the finest looking brown sugar on this planet.

yes. I knew that USA always racist against deaf people who are having hard time to find a real job for many years. Deaf american people sell ABC card to many hearing people accross the USA.

I can understand your point, however, deafness is not a race but would actually be classified as a condition that what you are describing would actually be considered discrimination which being deaf is not race related.

Ethnicity would be race related but being deaf is a medical condition.

What you are describing is discrimination not racism.

Onto the topic:

This is really the question at hand.

Who would be the defining party as to what is racism and who would be the enforcement division?

I mean we have a ban on illegal drugs but that is not going so well and costs money to enforce.

That would be the problem with a "ban" on that.

I mean would you for example:

Arrest and take to trial a rapper because he uses a term that if anyone else said it would be considered racist? or arrest a teen because he or she is copying the lyrics of a song? Would you impound that record turning it into the underground market? I mean look a the cop killer album it was banned originally but now is a top selling album. It had serious lyrics in it.

I'll lump this in with those silly USA commercials about hate and intolerance; I think they're stupid because they imply that you can stop a person from hating someone. As long as man still has free will there will be hate. Same as with racism and any other form of intolerance.

It's not something that can just be "fixed", and banning it surely won't help, since we already have laws in this country banning discrimination and you see how well that's worked.

I can see the OP had good will...but it is poorly thought out. There is no way I'm going to sign a petition which would further limit rights...much less one that is wide open for interpretation.

As others have mentioned here...if you start banning free speech...what is next?

I can see the OP had good will...but it is poorly thought out. There is no way I'm going to sign a petition which would further limit rights...much less one that is wide open for interpretation.

As others have mentioned here...if you start banning free speech...what is next?

People should have free speech as long as they are not intending to use it to harm any human being.

Freedom of speech does not include the right:

  1. To incite actions that would harm others.
    Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).
  2. To make or distribute obscene materials.
    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).
  3. To burn draft cards as an anti-war protest.
    United States v. O?Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968).
  4. To permit students to print articles in a school newspaper over the objections of the school administration.
    Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).
  5. Of students to make an obscene speech at a school-sponsored event.
    Bethel School District #43 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986).
  6. Of students to advocate illegal drug use at a school-sponsored event.
    Morse v. Frederick, __ U.S. __ (2007).

I might revise my petition and make it more direct. Still, I will try my very best to get the signatures to lock down on racism. America needs more authority and I for one somewhat agree with the gun law. The amendments I feel need to be updated. A lot of Americans abuse and use it to get away with things. That needs to come to a stop.

I agree with what John S said earlier in the thread - you cannot "ban" thoughts and feelings, which is what racism is. You are either racist or you are not, a government saying "You cannot be racist it is illegal" will do nothing. As long as you do nothing to draw attention to it, like protests in the streets etc, then nothing could be done, but the racism will still be there and done in less intrusive ways.

I've started a petition and need your help Neowinians. Please share this link with others -> https://petitions.wh...d-more/589sc1yy

selection001ro.png

can't legislate stupidity.. nor breach the first amendment. too many knuckleheads in the US want everything banned possible in hopes of NOT offending anyone

This country is becoming a nation of cry-babies. You do not like racism? Great, most normal people do not. So therefore, do not be racist. I think the vast majority of religion is absolutely useless, but I do support the right to believe and practice what you want as long as it is not physically harming others. If somebody wants to be hateful, it is on them.

Let me just mention though that these sort of issues tend to work themselves out. Sure, you may find a highly concentrated group of racist rednecks somewhere in Texas gathering their KKK members for a rally. Very rarely, though. Society tends to separate these people before they are even able to separate themselves. Good luck getting a decent job as an outspoken racist. Even where I live, there are probably no more than a handful of non-whites in a 10-mile radius, but you can guarantee racism is not tolerated.

I'm intrigued. How would this come about? I mean, how would it be enforced? What gets classed as racism? If I sit here and say, "I am white" am I being racist? If someone after me then says, "you are white" are they being racist?

Basically, the idea of racism is vague when trying to apply general rules, and even if it wasn't vague, there would be little way to prevent it. I'm not saying that I want racism to continue, I'm just saying that a petition to the White House doesn't sound like it's going to do much to change things.

EDIT: I just went to the webpage to see if there was any other information. The information that jumped out at me was the following: Total signatures on this petition: 2

It looks like I'm not alone in my thinking that this is an impossible task to implement.

Racism isn't just about skin color, it's part of the human psyche. It's in our behavior, part of our species, like in the rest of the animal kingdom.

Look at young kids at a playground. At a certain age they start to realise the other kid is 'different'.

Doesn't have to be different skin color, but differently dressed, talks different, hair color etc. etc. etc.

That kid is taken out of the group, ignored and bullied if worse.

Is that rasicm... yes. And it happens all over the globe.

Different part of town, you get the looks. Different city, you get the looks. Different country... etc. etc.

There's NO way to get that out of our society and culture, as it is part of what we are, human.

minimum wage jobs were never meant to be careers, that fallacy has been force fed to us for awhile. anyone without the ambition, who's willing to settle into an entry level job without seeking to improve their circumstance, doesn't deserve more money.

but back to the topic, there's no way either side would ever agree to something like banning thought. we'd all give up our freedoms the moment we decide what people should say or think.

So you'd be cool with me burning a bible? And just FYI some people don't have the skills to do more than entry level jobs. The republican utopia of a country where everybody's rich is economically impossible. Entry level jobs make up the bulk of a workforce, they will always be needed especially in service industries and somebody has to do them. Not everyone has the ability to become a CEO or executive, and most people doing entry level jobs work far harder than most pen pushers anyway. The fact they're low end jobs doesn't mean people should not be entitled to the same rights as everyone else.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I imagine that was a review or something? My reviews mostly contain a lot of images and galleries, but these are all webp too, but yeah it all adds up on the page load. Would help if you were more helpful with your critique instead of bitching and moaning like a Karen 😂 Because then we might be able to fix it for you.
    • If Valve refused to let them make the case, I wonder if they've already partnered with someone else to do it? The fact that they didn't seek permission/licence before diving straight in is incredible though
    • OpenClaw now has native mobile apps on iOS and Android by Karthik Mudaliar OpenClaw, the viral open-source personal AI agent, now has its own mobile app, available on both Android and iOS. Users can pair the app with an existing OpenClaw gateway and can start using new mobile-native features that are now available on the app. The app supports all the existing features you'd already have seen on OpenClaw's TUI, as well as some more, such as real-time and background Talk mode, action approvals, sharing from iOS, and optional access to device capabilities such as camera, screen, location, photos, contacts, calendar, and reminders. These features are available on both the Android and iOS versions of the app. What's important with these apps is that they don't run OpenClaw on your phone, but are actually just companion apps that require a running OpenClaw Gateway on an existing device, on macOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL2. To pair the app with your existing OpenClaw gateway, users need to run the command "/pair qr" on the TUI or existing chat interface, which brings up a QR code. Users can then scan this QR code to pair it up with the mobile app. There's also an option to manually pair the app by entering the host and a port. Previously, OpenClaw had been available on phones via WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, and others. Now, with a native mobile app, the interface is much cleaner and more focused on just the OpenClaw, of course, with the added support for camera, screen, location, and more. It's important to note that OpenClaw comes with its own security warnings. There's always a chance of prompt injection with these tools, so users are recommended to double-check authentication, tool policy, sandboxing, and execution approvals rather than prompts alone. For users well-versed with the AI harness, a native mobile app makes it easier to approve an automation, share a link, use voice, or let an agent react to phone-side context.
    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!