• 0

Transmit an array of strings in a POST operation using Jquery/AJAX


Question

Hello! I would like to submit an array of strings from a web form to my web service and need a little bit of hand holding. My web service I've written seems fine with having an array of strings as input but I'm not exactly sure how to encode this in javascript from my html form elements before I ship the data to my web service to be processed. The array of strings will be pretty small (on the order of 20x3 strings).

I suspect that there is a clever way to do this by coding the form correctly and just running a jquery .serialize() operation on the form and submitting it.

My first thought was to define a number of textbox inputs and give them incremental ID#'s such as "array0_0", "array0_1", "array0_2", "array1_0", "array1_1", "array_1_2", "array_2_1" etc.

Then as a first step before submitting the post, collect all the values in the textboxs and compile an array using 2 nested for loops. Something like that would probably work, but I was wondering if there was some magic that I could do in my form so that jquery recognizes an array of strings in my form so that the .serialize() function just does its magic.

Thanks!

-Shad

21 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Maybe use JSON to convert it back and forth as needed? That's how we do search suggestions on our website. A service serializes JSON, the ajax (jquery, really) javascript picks it up and parses it and displays the results.

  • 0

To be more specific... we have a series of services on one server... including a search service. When you type in a search box a javascript function sends off queries to the server (the web app action written to deal with this) which then queries the service. The service hands back the JSON response, all the action does is reads it as an input buffer and println's it out to the client. Once the javascript gets the response back it parses it and displays the result.

UI (javascript) --> Action (java) --> SERVICE (java) --> Action (java) --> UI (javascript)

  • 0


var arrayToStore = new Array();
var $strings = $('form input');
$strings.each(function(){
arrayToStore.push(this.val());
})
[/CODE]

Also, if you want to store them with a specific key, give them all a data-something attribute rather than abusing the ID property.

  • 0
  On 21/02/2013 at 17:23, threetonesun said:


var arrayToStore = new Array();
var $strings = $('form input');
$strings.each(function(){
arrayToStore.push(this.val());
})
[/CODE]

Also, if you want to store them with a specific key, give them all a data-something attribute rather than abusing the ID property.

I thought that it was only considered "abuse" if you don't use unique IDs.

Your solution is a good start but I need to make a 2d string array in the end so I'll need to tweak it.

  • 0
  On 21/02/2013 at 17:26, Shadrack said:

I'll try that. I found a JSON.stringify function but am not finding a serialize function.

I should look at the code... it probably isn't then, probably just a raw string being written.

  • 0

I have some ideas to play around with. Haha, its funny how much time is spent just communicating between applications and services. This particular application started as a standalone windows program, but my boss wants tighter control so now I'm extending it with a web front end. I think I've spent more time trying to figure out jquery and javascript than I did with the whole write up of my application. I guess whatever you are use to is easy, its when you are up against a learning curve that makes things hard.

Still, I'm amazed at how powerful this jquery and AJAX stuff is and how far the tools have come in the past 10 years. When I was doing full time web development I did everything in server side PHP scripting with auxiliary basic javascript stuff. Using AJAX has the huge advantage of not having to redraw the whole page for every little thing. Now it seems like it is better to offload as much work on the client side as you can and just write auxiliary server side scripting.

  • 0
  On 21/02/2013 at 17:32, Shadrack said:

I thought that it was only considered "abuse" if you don't use unique IDs.

Your solution is a good start but I need to make a 2d string array in the end so I'll need to tweak it.

It's not abuse, per se, but if you can use the data- attribute, it makes much more sense to use it in a case like this. If you gave them all some data-location1 and data-location2 attribute (or however named), as you iterate through with each you can grab those attributes using .attr(), and then store the final string in your 2d array.

  • 0
  On 21/02/2013 at 17:58, threetonesun said:

It's not abuse, per se, but if you can use the data- attribute, it makes much more sense to use it in a case like this. If you gave them all some data-location1 and data-location2 attribute (or however named), as you iterate through with each you can grab those attributes using .attr(), and then store the final string in your 2d array.

Word. Thanks.

  • 0


(function store(){
var arrayToStore = [['',''],['','']];
var $strings = $('form input');
$strings.each(function(){
var x = $(this).attr('data-loc1');
var y = $(this).attr('data-loc2');
arrayToStore[x][y] = $(this).val();
});
console.log(arrayToStore);
})();
[/CODE]

A better example...

  • 0

I keep getting an error when I try to use multidimensional arrays.

Here is my form:

<form>
	<table>
		<tr>
			<th> </th>
			<th>Independent</th>
			<th>Pass</th>
			<th>Fail</th>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<th>Data Labels</th>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="0" data-col="0" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="0" data-col="1" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="0" data-col="2" /></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<th>Data Row 1</th>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="1" data-col="0" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="1" data-col="1" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="1" data-col="2" /></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<th>Data Row 2</th>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="2" data-col="0" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="2" data-col="1" /></td>
			<td><input type="textbox" data-row="2" data-col="2" /></td>
		</tr>

		</table>
	</form>
	<p><input type="button" value="Run Regression" onClick="ProcessButtonClick()"/></p>

Here is my javascript:

   	 function ProcessButtonClick() {
			var arrayToStore = [['',''],['','']];
			var $strings = $('form input');
			$strings.each(function(){
				var x = parseInt($(this).attr('data-row'));
				var y = parseInt($(this).attr('data-col'));
				arrayToStore[x][y] = $(this).val();
			});
			console.log(arrayToStore);
}

I get this error in the console from Firebug:

  Quote

TypeError: can't convert undefined to object

arrayToStore[x][y] = $(this).val();

If I'm only addressing 1 index, it works (i.e., arrayToStore[x] = $(this).val(); does not give me an error but doesn't give me the right output obviously).

Thank you for your input and time.

  • 0

Its an array initialization problem... once I sized it correctly when dimensioning the array variable it worked fine:

var arrayToStore = [['','',''],['','',''],['','','']]

I did not think that Javascript arrays had to be strictly dimensioned... Is there a short hand for this? I would think new Array(3,3) or something would look better...

  • 0

#

# CORRECT WAY TO INSTANTIATE AN ARRAY WITHOUT DIMENSION

#

var arrayToStore = [];

#

# PROBLEM

#

var arrayToStore = [['',''],['','']];

#

# REASON

#

IF you instantiate the array with only the above "problem" dimensions and do not correct the length beyond this, they will be truncated.

  • 0
  On 21/02/2013 at 22:04, Shadrack said:

Its an array initialization problem... once I sized it correctly when dimensioning the array variable it worked fine:

var arrayToStore = [['','',''],['','',''],['','','']]

I did not think that Javascript arrays had to be strictly dimensioned... Is there a short hand for this? I would think new Array(3,3) or something would look better...

I had worked that code up in a fiddle and was getting the same error, hence why I posted it with ['','']. The general consensus seems to be to create a helper fuction that, given a number x, can push x number of blank objects into the array which you can then fill.

Or... just use an object. It's certainly the preferred way in JS unless you really need an array of arrays.

  On 21/02/2013 at 22:08, tim_s said:

#

# CORRECT WAY TO INSTANTIATE AN ARRAY WITHOUT DIMENSION

#

var arrayToStore = [];

#

# PROBLEM

#

var arrayToStore = [['',''],['','']];

#

# REASON

#

IF you instantiate the array with only the above "problem" dimensions and do not correct the length beyond this, they will be truncated.

If you do arrayToStore = [] and then try to set arrayToStore[0][0] = something, you'll get the same error.

  • 0

If you gave me an example of how you would like the content it might make it easier but off the top of my mind - how does this work?


var arrayData = [];

function ProcessButtonClick() {

var $strings = $('form input');

$strings.each(function(){

var arrayParent = [];
var arrayChild = [];

var x = parseInt($(this).attr('data-row'));
var y = parseInt($(this).attr('data-col'));

arrayChild[x] = $(this).val();
arrayParent[y].push(arrayChild);
arrayData.push(arrayParent)

});



}
[/CODE]

  • 0

tim_s - I get this error:

  Quote

TypeError: arrayParent[y] is undefined

arrayParent[y].push(arrayChild);

Seems like the only way for me to get it to work is to declare the full size of the array... in just about every language you can initialize the size of an array directly but for some reason this doesn't seem possible in Javascript unless I'm missing something.

In the end, the size of my table is fixed so dimensioning out the variable before hand is fine.

  • 0
  On 21/02/2013 at 23:27, Shadrack said:

Seems like the only way for me to get it to work is to declare the full size of the array... in just about every language you can initialize the size of an array directly but for some reason this doesn't seem possible in Javascript unless I'm missing something.

In the end, the size of my table is fixed so dimensioning out the variable before hand is fine.

You're not, as I mentioned, it's not a preferred way of doing things in JS. If you must, this will work:


<script>
var multidArray = function(y){
var array = [];
for(i=0;i<y;i++){
array.push(['example', 'array']);
}
return array;
}
var newArray = multidArray(6);
newArray[1][0] = ['now', 1,1];
newArray[1][1] = 'modified';
console.log(newArray);
</script>
[/CODE]

However, in JS, this is preferable:

[CODE]
var better = {};
better[0] = {1: 'this', 2 : 'will', 3: 'work', 4: 'much', 5: 'better'};
console.log(better[0][1]); // will log 'this'
[/CODE]

  • 0

Well..its all moot because I can't get the input array into my web service.... apparently arrays of strings are a supported output (in JSON format) but not a supported input. I'll have to turn my table into CSV and then program my web service accordingly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft Defender XDR gets TITAN-powered Security Copilot recommendations by Paul Hill Guided Response, a Copilot-powered capability in Microsoft Defender XDR that guides analysts through step-by-step investigation and response flows, is getting a big upgrade with the introduction of TITAN recommendations. With TITAN, Microsoft wants to give security analysts real-time, threat-intel-driven recommendations so they can better prepare against attacks, before they even happen. TITAN is an adaptive threat intelligence graph that uses data from first and third-party telemetry and employs guilt-by-association techniques to warn analysts about unknown IP addresses that could pose a threat, due to their association with known malicious addresses. The primary benefit of TITAN is that security analysts get faster warnings about potential threats before they even have a chance to cause a problem. TITAN is an enhancement of Security Copilot Guided Response, rather than a replacement to it. With this extra tool, security analysts will be able to better keep up with evolving threats. Understanding TITAN's AI-powered threat intelligence The Redmond giant said that TITAN “represents a new wave of innovation” built upon its threat intelligence capabilities that introduces a real-time, adaptive threat intelligence graph. It takes telemetry from first and third-party sources such as Microsoft Defender for Threat Intelligence, Microsoft Defender for Experts, and customer feedback. The graph uses guilt-by-association techniques to mark unknown devices as threats, if they’re associated with known malicious entities. This gives security analysts a window of opportunity to take action and prevent harm. To identify potential threats, Microsoft uses a semi-supervised label propagation technique that assigns reputation scores to nodes based on the score of their neighbors. These reputation scores allow Microsoft’s unified security operation platform to implement containment and remediation actions via attack disruption. Practical impact and future outlook The new TITAN suggestion now appears within Guided Response as triage and containment recommendations. When a suspicious IP is detected, a Guided Response recommendation is automatically generated. These can help security analysts deal with various threats including IP addresses, IP ranges, and email senders. Microsoft said in early testing its TITAN recommendations have shown good results. TITAN boosted Guided Response triage accuracy by 8%, it reduced the time needed to investigate and respond to incidents, and its explainable recommendations gave analysts more confidence in the actions they take. As threats become more sophisticated, Microsoft’s TITAN will help to tackle threats before they even become an issue.
    • China wants the tech... if they were to invade, TSMC would destroy it's fabs and other critical information first. Plus, you can bet they have backups stored NOT in Taiwan.
    • Malware website host in China in 3….2…1
    • You totally missed what I was saying. Yes, the DHCP server software is largely unchanged since the Windows 2000 Server version. My statement was somewhat of a joke, but I was saying that *IF* the DHCP server was written using today's Windows 11 *ERA* design philosophy, it would be a mess. Yes, even on the latest version of Windows Server it still uses the old software, but that wasn't really the point.
    • Yeah no, they are nowhere at this same level. Whatsapp did survive a lot of time being "free" it is just meta/facebook wanting more money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Enthusiast
      Motoman26 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Mentor
      M. Murcek went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Explorer
      treker_ed went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Apprentice
      CHUNWEI went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Veteran
      1337ish went up a rank
      Veteran
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      673
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      268
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      176
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      172
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      139
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!