Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I've been banging my about this for so long I'm sure I'm just going round in circles.

I have an exchange 2003 Server emails appear to get stuck in the queue.

I have run smtpdiag and this is the output I get:


Searching for Exchange external DNS settings.
Computer name is ******-SERVER.
VSI 1 has the following external DNS servers:
208.67.222.222

Checking SOA for ****construction.com.
Checking external DNS servers.
Checking internal DNS servers.
SOA serial number match: Passed.


Checking local domain records.

Checking MX records using TCP: ******international.com.
Checking MX records using UDP: ******international.com.
Both TCP and UDP queries succeeded. Local DNS test passed.

Checking remote domain records.

Checking MX records using TCP: ****construction.com.
Checking MX records using UDP: ****construction.com.

Both TCP and UDP queries succeeded. Remote DNS test passed.


Checking MX servers listed for *@****construction.com.
Connecting to mail.***construction.com [81.***.2*8.1*4] on port 25.
Failed to receive data. Error: 10054
Error: Expected "250". Failed to get a response from the server.
Failed to submit mail to mail.asemconstruction.com.
[/CODE]

I keep getting Error:10054 no matter what email server I try to send to.

If however I telnet into a mail server it works perfectly fine and I get no errors :(

This is doing my head in!

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

James

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1137918-exchange-2003-queue-stuck/
Share on other sites

It's been a long while since I looked at Exchange 2003, but a good place to start would be to enable SMTP logs; http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2000/monitoring-operations/Logging_the_SMTP_Service.html

Have you looked/checked all services are running?

looks like firewall or something?

I thought that, all the ports are open. Could this be as simple as a faulty router?

It's been a long while since I looked at Exchange 2003, but a good place to start would be to enable SMTP logs; http://www.msexchang...TP_Service.html

Have you looked/checked all services are running?

All the services are running yes I'll get a log in a moment.

SK[' timestamp=1361532934' post='595536540]

Sorry, you can telnet from the exchange server to the server it's attempting to reach then?

As a quick fix can you not relay via your ISP's mail server (Smart Host)?

Yes I can telnet to the mail server perfectly fine and issue commands without being booted.

I'm just about to try the smart host now.

--EDIT--

Okay..... The Smart Host hasn't worked. Setting up the smart host still gives me the same issues. In the queue I have this error message:

The connection was dropped by the remote host.

when you are running telnet, are you running it from the mail server? This would test port 25 on the mail server to negate any firewalls.

Next you will have to try to find an application conflict, you should also check to see if your smtp service is running as well as your transports. I don't have a 2003 server to help you troubleshoot, I am going off memory and I believe you have to have the microsoft smtp service enabled to even think about sending and receiving mail.. also you will need to make sure the exchange routing engine is started in services.msc

Look at your event logs as well for errors.

when you are running telnet, are you running it from the mail server? This would test port 25 on the mail server to negate any firewalls.

Next you will have to try to find an application conflict, you should also check to see if your smtp service is running as well as your transports. I don't have a 2003 server to help you troubleshoot, I am going off memory and I believe you have to have the microsoft smtp service enabled to even think about sending and receiving mail.. also you will need to make sure the exchange routing engine is started in services.msc

Look at your event logs as well for errors.

I have indeed been running the telnet commands from the mail server.

The SMTP service is started as is the exchange routing engine, both services have also been restarted and still not working :(

You have something that is stopping communications. Do you have a spam filter? What is the outbound rate limit (this will log jam the crap out of your server).

Looking at your log, I would say that you have a low rate limit set on your outbound mail filter. Just to the 1 IP you have over 100 going to it. Set it to 200 or 500.

Here is a pic of my barracuda you will see that it is at the default, some are much lower set to around 50 per Sender.

post-118098-0-79906200-1361541827.jpg

You have something that is stopping communications. Do you have a spam filter? What is the outbound rate limit (this will log jam the crap out of your server).

Looking at your log, I would say that you have a low rate limit set on your outbound mail filter. Just to the 1 IP you have over 100 going to it. Set it to 200 or 500.

Here is a pic of my barracuda you will see that it is at the default, some are much lower set to around 50 per Sender.

At the moment these limits are off...

The one that is on was already set to MUCH higher than 500

post-279758-0-72473800-1361542296.png

Just took another look at that log file....postfix is your smtp outbound, you will need to check that box to allow through....it is caught up in there. Judging from the codes you are getting...fix your spam filter.

We don't use PostFix :s There is nothing installed on this server apart from exchange.

lets start simply....do you have a spam solution outside of your exchange solution?

do you have anything setup in your smarthost?

Servers/Your_Server/Protocols/SMTP/Your_SMTP_Virtual_Server

Right-click Your_SMTP_Virtual_Server, and then click Properties.

Click the Delivery tab, and then click Advanced.

In the Smart host box, type the name of the smart host server.

There are 2 areas that I can remember where you can add a smart host....this is one of two.

lets start simply....do you have a spam solution outside of your exchange solution?

No, Exchange is configured to send mail via DNS, we aren't using a Smart Host. The email is not configured to "go" anywhere else.

We don't use PostFix :s There is nothing installed on this server apart from exchange.

sorry looking at other domains in your mail logs. It could be on there end causing the issue and you will have to wait for their mail server to accept mail from you again, if they have a low rate control (the top field in my pic above). (you have no control over this). try sending mail to a gmail or yahoo account. does it work?

sorry looking at other domains in your mail logs. It could be on there end causing the issue and you will have to wait for their mail server to accept mail from you again, if they have a low rate control (the top field in my pic above). (you have no control over this). try sending mail to a gmail or yahoo account. does it work?

SK[' timestamp=1361543221' post='595536752]

Is all mail being queued or just mail for one domain your sending to?

It looks like it is ANY domain.

I cannot send to Outlook.com, gmail.com, yahoo.co.uk I cannot send to any domain at the moment.

SK[' timestamp=1361543358' post='595536764]

Receiving OK?

I am receiving emails perfectly yeah.

Hi,

Port 25 is a wide open SMTP port - have you checked for a higher range port that supports SSL or STARTTLS?

What other ports can I use? I here 10025 is used in places? Doing this won't cause issues will it?

SK[' timestamp=1361543221' post='595536752]

Is all mail being queued or just mail for one domain your sending to?

If you look at the log file he posted, it looks like the majority of it is spamming domains and those domains have stopped allowing him to spam them. download it and organize by column c...100's going to the same ip addresses. there is 1 ip that has less than 15. everything else seems to be very very high.

would it be possible to setup a teamviewer session so that I can see what is going on. it is completely up to you, I am willing to led a hand if you would like me to.

SK[' timestamp=1361543629' post='595536778]

I looked at the log, tried to open it in Notepad which failed hard.

Shove your external IP in here to see if your on a spam database... http://www.spamhaus.org/lookup/

yeah, try excel viewer.

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=10

SK[' timestamp=1361543629' post='595536778]

I looked at the log, tried to open it in Notepad which failed hard.

Shove your external IP in here to see if your on a spam database... http://www.spamhaus.org/lookup/

Yeah I've checked for spam listings, they aren't listed anywhere.

would it be possible to setup a teamviewer session so that I can see what is going on. it is completely up to you, I am willing to led a hand if you would like me to.

If you want to private message me, then I can set this up thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • YouTube has finally brought back its DMs feature, but only in these countries by David Uzondu Late last year, YouTube started testing a "new" way to share videos directly with friends, without having to leave the app. Now, the video giant has announced that is now rolling out a revamped direct messaging inbox, which lets you share videos, Shorts, and live streams and have conversations about them, directly on YouTube. The platform limits this feature to 18+ users who are signed in to a verified channel and use the latest mobile app version. Direct messaging on YouTube first became a thing back in 2017 inside the mobile app (later renamed to "Messages"), where users could chat one-on-one and share clips directly, but all that came to an end on September 18, 2019, when Google decided to shut it down after giving users a month to download a .zip file archive of their past chats. No one really knows why YouTube killed the feature, but users were encouraged to migrate to the public Comments section, on Community tab posts, and via YouTube Stories. The previous incarnation suffered from moderation challenges, prompting Google to implement stricter safety guidelines and age verifications for this new iteration. Here's a list of the countries where the re-launched feature is currently available, though note that Brand Accounts do not have access to it, at least for now: Countries American Samoa Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guam Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Northern Mariana Islands Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland U.S. Virgin Islands United Kingdom United States Before you can use the feature, you first have to send an invite link to your contact. Invite links expire exactly seven days after you create them. If the person on the other end accepts the invite, you can exchange videos directly and text back and forth inside the app. To delete a message, just long-press on the message and tap unsend to remove it for both users. You can also delete entire conversations by long-pressing the thread and selecting delete, but the other person will continue to see the chat history on their end. To make sure everything remains safe, YouTube monitors these messages to ensure they follow Community Guidelines.
    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • Is it still super slow or has it improved on that area?
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      213
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!